Georgiou Andrew, Westbrook Johanna I
Health Informatics Research & Evaluation Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:678-82.
The importance of health informatics evaluations adopting a pluralist approach which considers the technical as well as the organizational and social aspects of system implementation has been espoused by many researchers. Kaplan's 4Cs evaluation framework presents a lens through which evaluations of clinical systems can be assessed, with a focus on communication, care, control and context. Our aim was to investigate the effects of Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) on Emergency Department (ED) work, communication practices and patient care using this framework as a means to orient the study. A qualitative study using interviews and focus groups was undertaken in an Australian 640-bed ED after the introduction of CPOE. Systematic concurrent analysis revealed five themes: i) Expectations; ii) Changes in responsibility; iii) Monitoring of the test order process; iv) System usability; and v) System requirements. CPOE systems in EDs present specific challenges which differ from other hospital departments. Due to the critical nature of clinical work in this setting a poor fit between CPOE and ED work may result in serious incidents.
许多研究人员都支持健康信息学评估采用多元化方法的重要性,这种方法既要考虑系统实施的技术层面,也要考虑组织和社会层面。卡普兰的4C评估框架提供了一个视角,通过它可以评估临床系统,重点关注沟通、护理、控制和背景。我们的目的是使用这个框架作为研究导向,调查计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)对急诊科(ED)工作、沟通实践和患者护理的影响。在澳大利亚一家拥有640张床位的急诊科引入CPOE后,采用访谈和焦点小组进行了一项定性研究。系统的同步分析揭示了五个主题:i)期望;ii)责任变化;iii)检验医嘱流程的监控;iv)系统可用性;v)系统要求。急诊科的CPOE系统存在与其他医院科室不同的特定挑战。由于该环境中临床工作的关键性质,CPOE与急诊科工作之间的不匹配可能会导致严重事件。