• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人催眠药物使用后次日清晨进行公路驾驶:替马西泮 20 毫克、佐匹克隆 7.5 毫克和安慰剂的比较。

Highway driving in the elderly the morning after bedtime use of hypnotics: a comparison between temazepam 20 mg, zopiclone 7.5 mg, and placebo.

机构信息

Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Oct;29(5):432-8. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181b57b43.

DOI:10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181b57b43
PMID:19745642
Abstract

A major problem related to hypnotic drug use is residual sedation the morning after bedtime administration. This constitutes a particular safety hazard for patients who have to drive a car the next morning. Information on the severity of residual effects is mainly derived from studies conducted with young healthy volunteers. However, most users of hypnotics are older people who may be more sensitive to drug effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the residual effects the morning after evening doses of temazepam 20 mg and zopiclone 7.5 mg on driving performance in healthy elderly drivers. Eighteen healthy elderly drivers (10 females and 8 males; mean age, 64.3 years) participated in a double-blind, 3-way crossover study. Treatments were single oral doses of temazepam 20 mg, zopiclone 7.5 mg, and placebo administered at bedtime. Subjects performed a standardized highway driving test between 10 and 11 hours after hypnotic intake. Before and after the driving test, cognitive performance was assessed. Driving performance did not differ between temazepam and placebo but was significantly impaired after zopiclone 7.5 mg (P < 0.002). The results of the laboratory tests were in line with the effects on driving of both hypnotics. Temazepam 20 mg is unlikely to impair driving 10 hours or more after bedtime administration in healthy elderly aged 75 years or younger. Zopiclone 7.5 mg moderately impairs driving in the elderly at least until 11 hours after administration. The magnitude of impairing effects in the elderly was comparable with those found previously in younger volunteers.

摘要

催眠药物使用的一个主要问题是在夜间给药后早晨的残留镇静作用。这对第二天早上必须开车的患者构成了特别的安全隐患。关于残留效应严重程度的信息主要来自于对年轻健康志愿者进行的研究。然而,大多数催眠药物使用者是老年人,他们可能对药物作用更敏感。本研究旨在评估健康老年驾驶员夜间服用替马唑仑 20mg 和佐匹克隆 7.5mg 后,早晨对驾驶表现的残留效应。18 名健康老年驾驶员(10 名女性和 8 名男性;平均年龄 64.3 岁)参加了一项双盲、三交叉研究。治疗方法为睡前单次口服替马唑仑 20mg、佐匹克隆 7.5mg 和安慰剂。受试者在催眠药物摄入后 10 至 11 小时进行标准化高速公路驾驶测试。在驾驶测试前后,评估认知表现。替马唑仑与安慰剂相比,驾驶表现无差异,但佐匹克隆 7.5mg 后显著受损(P<0.002)。实验室测试结果与两种催眠药物对驾驶的影响一致。在 75 岁或以下的健康老年人中,替马唑仑在睡前给药 10 小时或更长时间后不太可能损害驾驶能力。佐匹克隆 7.5mg 至少在给药后 11 小时内会中度损害老年人的驾驶能力。老年人的损害效应幅度与以前在年轻志愿者中发现的相当。

相似文献

1
Highway driving in the elderly the morning after bedtime use of hypnotics: a comparison between temazepam 20 mg, zopiclone 7.5 mg, and placebo.老年人催眠药物使用后次日清晨进行公路驾驶:替马西泮 20 毫克、佐匹克隆 7.5 毫克和安慰剂的比较。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Oct;29(5):432-8. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181b57b43.
2
Highway driving performance and cognitive functioning the morning after bedtime and middle-of-the-night use of gaboxadol, zopiclone and zolpidem.褪黑素受体激动剂加巴喷丁、佐匹克隆和唑吡坦睡前和半夜用药对次日高速公路驾驶表现和认知功能的影响。
J Sleep Res. 2009 Dec;18(4):387-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00746.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
3
Zopiclone's residual effects on actual driving performance in a standardized test: a pooled analysis of age and sex effects in 4 placebo-controlled studies.佐匹克隆在标准化测试中对实际驾驶性能的残留影响:4项安慰剂对照研究中年龄和性别效应的汇总分析。
Clin Ther. 2014 Jan 1;36(1):141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
4
Post-bedtime dosing with indiplon in adults and the elderly: results from two placebo-controlled, active comparator crossover studies in healthy volunteers.成人及老年人使用因地普隆的睡前给药:两项在健康志愿者中进行的安慰剂对照、活性对照交叉研究的结果。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Mar;24(3):837-46. doi: 10.1185/030079908X273327. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
5
Effects of prolonged-release melatonin, zolpidem, and their combination on psychomotor functions, memory recall, and driving skills in healthy middle aged and elderly volunteers.褪黑素缓释片、唑吡坦及其组合对健康中年和老年志愿者心理运动功能、记忆回忆及驾驶技能的影响
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2008 Dec;23(8):693-705. doi: 10.1002/hup.980.
6
Next-day effects of ramelteon (8 mg), zopiclone (7.5 mg), and placebo on highway driving performance, memory functioning, psychomotor performance, and mood in healthy adult subjects.雷美替胺(8 毫克)、佐匹克隆(7.5 毫克)和安慰剂对健康成年受试者次日高速公路驾驶表现、记忆功能、精神运动表现和情绪的影响。
Sleep. 2011 Oct 1;34(10):1327-34. doi: 10.5665/SLEEP.1272.
7
Residual effects of zopiclone and benzodiazepine hypnotics on psychomotor performance related to car driving.佐匹克隆和苯二氮䓬类催眠药对与驾驶汽车相关的精神运动表现的残留影响。
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1985;11(12):823-9.
8
Next-day cognition, psychomotor function, and driving-related skills following nighttime administration of eszopiclone.夜间服用右佐匹克隆后的次日认知、精神运动功能及驾驶相关技能
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jul;23(5):385-97. doi: 10.1002/hup.936.
9
On-the-road driving performance the morning after bedtime use of suvorexant 15 and 30 mg in healthy elderly.健康老年人睡前服用15毫克和30毫克苏沃雷生后次日上午的道路驾驶性能。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Sep;233(18):3341-51. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4375-x. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
10
A double-blind study to establish the residual effects of zopiclone on performance in healthy volunteers.一项双盲研究,旨在确定佐匹克隆对健康志愿者表现的残留影响。
Int Pharmacopsychiatry. 1982;17 Suppl 2:98-108.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of motor vehicle operator performance assessments for benzodiazepine receptor agonists.苯二氮䓬受体激动剂机动车驾驶员性能评估的范围综述
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Nov 9;16:100538. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100538. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics and police-reported motor vehicle crash risk among older adults: a sequential target trial emulation.非苯二氮䓬类催眠药与老年人警方报告的机动车碰撞风险:一项序贯目标试验模拟研究
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 4;194(3):662-673. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae168.
3
Guideline for evaluating the effects of psychotropic drugs on motor vehicle driving performance in Japan: A tiered approach for the assessment of clinically meaningful driving impairment.
日本评估精神药物对机动车驾驶性能影响的指南:评估临床意义上驾驶损害的分层方法。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2024 Jun;44(2):308-313. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12436. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
Navigating the complex landscape of benzodiazepine- and Z-drug diversity: insights from comprehensive FDA adverse event reporting system analysis and beyond.探索苯二氮䓬类药物和Z类药物多样性的复杂局面:来自美国食品药品监督管理局全面不良事件报告系统分析及其他方面的见解
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 23;14:1188101. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1188101. eCollection 2023.
5
Do hypnotics increase the risk of driving accidents or near miss accidents due to hypovigilance? The effects of sex, chronic sleepiness, sleep habits and sleep pathology.催眠剂是否会因警觉性降低而增加驾驶事故或险兆事故的风险?性别、慢性嗜睡、睡眠习惯和睡眠病理的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 27;15(7):e0236404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236404. eCollection 2020.
6
Insomnia in the Elderly: A Review.老年人失眠:综述。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Jun 15;14(6):1017-1024. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7172.
7
Medication use and the risk of motor vehicle collisions among licensed drivers: A systematic review.持证驾驶员的药物使用与机动车碰撞风险:一项系统综述。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Nov;96:255-270. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
8
On-the-road driving performance the morning after bedtime use of suvorexant 15 and 30 mg in healthy elderly.健康老年人睡前服用15毫克和30毫克苏沃雷生后次日上午的道路驾驶性能。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Sep;233(18):3341-51. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4375-x. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
9
Concurrent Use of Benzodiazepines and Antidepressants and the Risk of Motor Vehicle Accident in Older Drivers: A Nested Case-Control Study.苯二氮䓬类药物与抗抑郁药联合使用与老年驾驶员机动车事故风险:一项巢式病例对照研究。
Neurol Ther. 2015 Jun;4(1):39-51. doi: 10.1007/s40120-015-0026-0. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
10
A randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess the sensitivity of the CRCDS Mini-Sim to the next-day residual effects of zopiclone.一项随机、交叉、安慰剂对照临床试验,旨在评估CRCDS Mini-Sim对佐匹克隆次日残留效应的敏感性。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2015 Jun;6(3):86-97. doi: 10.1177/2042098615579314.