Masaoka Aya, Horton Julie K, Beard William A, Wilson Samuel H
Laboratory of Structural Biology, NIEHS, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
DNA Repair (Amst). 2009 Nov 2;8(11):1290-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
To examine base excision repair (BER) capacity in the context of living cells, we developed and applied a plasmid-based reporter assay. Non-replicating plasmids containing unique DNA base lesions were designed to express luciferase only after lesion repair had occurred, and luciferase expression in transfected cells was measured continuously during a repair period of 14 h. Two types of DNA lesions were examined: uracil opposite T reflecting repair primarily by the single-nucleotide BER sub-pathway, and the abasic site analogue tetrahydrofuran (THF) opposite C reflecting repair by long-patch BER. We found that the repair capacity for uracil-DNA in wild type mouse fibroblasts was very strong, whereas the repair capacity for THF-DNA, although strong, was slightly weaker. Repair capacity in DNA polymerase beta (Pol beta) null cells for uracil-DNA and THF-DNA was reduced by approximately 15% and 20%, respectively, compared to that in wild type cells. In both cases, the repair deficiency was fully complemented in Pol beta null cells expressing recombinant Pol beta. The effect of inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) activity on repair capacity was examined by treatment of cells with the inhibitor 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide (4-AN). PARP inhibition decreased the repair capacity for both lesions in wild type cells, and this reduction was to the same level as that seen in Pol beta null cells. In contrast, 4-AN had no effect on repair in Pol beta null cells. The results highlight that Pol beta and PARP function in the same repair pathway, but also suggest that there is repair independent of both Pol beta and PARP activities. Thus, before the BER capacity of a cell can be predicted or modulated, a better understanding of Pol beta and PARP activity-independent BER pathways is required.
为了在活细胞环境中检测碱基切除修复(BER)能力,我们开发并应用了一种基于质粒的报告基因检测方法。设计含有独特DNA碱基损伤的非复制性质粒,使其仅在损伤修复发生后表达荧光素酶,并在14小时的修复期内连续测量转染细胞中的荧光素酶表达。研究了两种类型的DNA损伤:T对面的尿嘧啶,主要通过单核苷酸BER子途径反映修复情况;C对面的无碱基位点类似物四氢呋喃(THF),通过长补丁BER反映修复情况。我们发现,野生型小鼠成纤维细胞中尿嘧啶-DNA的修复能力非常强,而THF-DNA的修复能力虽然也很强,但略弱。与野生型细胞相比,DNA聚合酶β(Polβ)缺失细胞中尿嘧啶-DNA和THF-DNA的修复能力分别降低了约15%和20%。在这两种情况下,表达重组Polβ的Polβ缺失细胞中的修复缺陷都得到了完全补充。通过用抑制剂4-氨基-1,8-萘二甲酰亚胺(4-AN)处理细胞,检测了抑制聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶(PARP)活性对修复能力的影响。PARP抑制降低了野生型细胞中两种损伤的修复能力,且这种降低程度与Polβ缺失细胞中的相同。相比之下,4-AN对Polβ缺失细胞的修复没有影响。结果表明,Polβ和PARP在同一修复途径中发挥作用,但也表明存在独立于Polβ和PARP活性的修复。因此,在预测或调节细胞的BER能力之前,需要更好地了解独立于Polβ和PARP活性的BER途径。