Pradhan Aruna D, Everett Brendan M, Cook Nancy R, Rifai Nader, Ridker Paul M
Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 900 Commonwealth Ave E, Boston, MA 02215-1204, USA.
JAMA. 2009 Sep 16;302(11):1186-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1347.
As diabetes is in part an inflammatory condition, the initiation of insulin and/or metformin may beneficially reduce levels of inflammatory biomarkers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
To determine whether insulin alone or combined with metformin lowers levels of hsCRP, IL-6, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (sTNFr2) in patients with recent-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized 2 x 2 factorial trial of open-label insulin glargine and placebo-controlled metformin in 500 adults with type 2 diabetes (median time from diagnosis, 2.0 years), suboptimal glycemic control, and elevated hsCRP levels. Patients were recruited from US office-based practices between October 2006 and December 2008.
Random allocation to 1 of 4 treatments (placebo metformin only, placebo metformin and insulin glargine, active metformin only, or active metformin and insulin glargine) with dose titration targeting fasting blood glucose less than 110 mg/dL.
Change in hsCRP level (primary end point) and change in IL-6 and sTNFr2 levels (secondary end points) from baseline to 14 weeks.
Levels of glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) were significantly reduced with active treatment vs placebo (all P values <.001). Levels of hsCRP were reduced in all 4 groups. There was no significant difference in hsCRP reduction among those allocated to insulin (-11.8%; 95% CI, -18.7% to -4.4%) or to no insulin (-17.5%; 95% CI, -23.9% to -10.5%) (P for difference = .25), or among those allocated to active metformin (-18.1%; 95% CI, -24.4% to -11.1%) or placebo metformin (-11.2%; 95% CI, -18.1% to -3.7%) (P for difference = .17). In the individual treatment groups, despite a differential impact on glucose control, reductions in hsCRP in the metformin (-16.1%; 95% CI, -25.1% to -6.1%) and metformin plus insulin (-20.1%; 95% CI, -28.8% to -10.4%) groups were no different than reductions with placebo alone (-19.0%; 95% CI, -27.8% to -9.1%; P = .67 and .87 vs placebo, respectively). By contrast, hsCRP reduction was attenuated with insulin alone (-2.9%, 95% CI, -13.2% to 8.6%; P = .03 vs placebo). Similar findings were noted for levels of IL-6 and sTNFr2.
In patients with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, treatment with insulin or metformin compared with placebo did not reduce inflammatory biomarker levels despite improving glucose control.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00366301.
由于糖尿病部分属于炎症性疾病,起始使用胰岛素和/或二甲双胍可能有益地降低炎症生物标志物水平,如高敏C反应蛋白(hsCRP)。
确定单独使用胰岛素或联合二甲双胍是否能降低近期诊断的2型糖尿病患者的hsCRP、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体2(sTNFr2)水平。
设计、地点和参与者:对500名2型糖尿病成年人进行随机2×2析因试验,使用开放标签的甘精胰岛素和安慰剂对照的二甲双胍,这些患者诊断时间中位数为2.0年,血糖控制不佳且hsCRP水平升高。患者于2006年10月至2008年12月从美国门诊招募。
随机分配至4种治疗中的1种(仅安慰剂二甲双胍、安慰剂二甲双胍和甘精胰岛素、仅活性二甲双胍或活性二甲双胍和甘精胰岛素),剂量滴定目标为空腹血糖低于110mg/dL。
从基线到14周hsCRP水平的变化(主要终点)以及IL-6和sTNFr2水平的变化(次要终点)。
与安慰剂相比,活性治疗使血糖和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平显著降低(所有P值<.001)。所有4组的hsCRP水平均降低。分配至胰岛素组(降低11.8%;95%CI,-18.7%至-4.4%)或未使用胰岛素组(降低17.5%;95%CI,-23.9%至-10.5%)的患者,hsCRP降低幅度无显著差异(差异P值=.25);分配至活性二甲双胍组(降低18.1%;95%CI,-24.4%至-11.1%)或安慰剂二甲双胍组(降低11.2%;95%CI,-18.1%至-3.7%)的患者,hsCRP降低幅度也无显著差异(差异P值=.17)。在各个治疗组中,尽管对血糖控制有不同影响,但二甲双胍组(降低16.1%;95%CI,-25.1%至-6.1%)和二甲双胍加胰岛素组(降低20.1%;95%CI,-28.8%至-10.4%)的hsCRP降低幅度与仅使用安慰剂组(降低19.0%;95%CI,-27.8%至-9.1%)相比无差异(分别与安慰剂相比,P值=.67和.87)。相比之下,单独使用胰岛素时hsCRP降低幅度减弱(降低2.9%,95%CI,-13.2%至8.6%;与安慰剂相比,P值=.03)。IL-6和sTNFr2水平也有类似发现。
在近期诊断的2型糖尿病患者中,与安慰剂相比,使用胰岛素或二甲双胍治疗虽改善了血糖控制,但并未降低炎症生物标志物水平。
clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00366301。