Suppr超能文献

两耳间相关性无法解释经典双耳任务中的察觉:动态时间差主导 N0Spi 察觉。

Interaural correlation fails to account for detection in a classic binaural task: dynamic ITDs dominate N0Spi detection.

机构信息

Laboratory of Auditory Neurophysiology, K.U. Leuven Medical School, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.

出版信息

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010 Mar;11(1):113-31. doi: 10.1007/s10162-009-0185-8. Epub 2009 Sep 17.

Abstract

Binaural signal detection in an NoSpi task relies on interaural disparities introduced by adding an antiphasic signal to diotic noise. What metric of interaural disparity best predicts performance? Some models use interaural correlation; others differentiate between dynamic interaural time differences (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs) of the effective stimulus. To examine the relative contributions of ITDs and ILDs in binaural detection, we developed a novel signal processing technique that selectively degrades different aspects (potential cues) of binaural stimuli (e.g., only ITDs are scrambled). Degrading a particular cue will affect performance only if that cue is relevant to the binaural processing underlying detection. This selective scrambling technique was applied to the stimuli of a classic N0Spi task in which the listener had to detect an antiphasic 500-Hz signal in the presence of a diotic wideband noise masker. Data obtained from five listeners showed that (1) selective scrambling of ILDs had little effect on binaural detection, (2) selective scrambling of ITDs significantly degraded detection, and (3) combined scrambling of ILDs and ITDs had the same effect as exclusive scrambling of ITDs. Regarding the question which stimulus properties determine detection, we conclude that for this binaural task (1) dynamic ITDs dominate detection performance, (2) ILDs are largely irrelevant, and (3) interaural correlation of the stimulus is a poor predictor of detection. Two simple stimulus-based models that each reproduce all binaural aspects of the data quite well are described: (1) a single-parameter detection model using ITD variance as detection criterion and (2) a compressive transformation followed by a crosscorrelation analysis. The success of both of these contrasting models shows that our data alone cannot reveal the mechanisms underlying the dominance of ITD cues. The physiological implications of our findings are discussed.

摘要

在 NoSpi 任务中的双耳信号检测依赖于通过向对耳噪声添加反相信号引入的耳间差异。哪种耳间差异度量最能预测性能?一些模型使用耳间相关;其他模型则区分有效刺激的动态耳间时间差 (ITD) 和耳间强度差 (ILD)。为了研究 ITD 和 ILD 在双耳检测中的相对贡献,我们开发了一种新颖的信号处理技术,该技术可选择性地降低双耳刺激的不同方面(潜在线索)(例如,仅打乱 ITD)。只有当该线索与检测所基于的双耳处理相关时,破坏特定线索才会影响性能。该选择性扰乱技术应用于经典 NoSpi 任务的刺激中,其中听众必须在存在对耳宽带噪声掩蔽的情况下检测反相信号 500Hz 信号。来自五名听众的数据表明:(1)ILD 的选择性扰乱对双耳检测几乎没有影响,(2)ITD 的选择性扰乱显著降低了检测,以及 (3)ILD 和 ITD 的联合扰乱与 ITD 的独占扰乱具有相同的效果。关于哪些刺激特性决定检测的问题,我们得出结论,对于此双耳任务:(1)动态 ITD 主导检测性能,(2)ILD 基本无关,以及 (3)刺激的耳间相关是检测的不良预测指标。描述了两种简单的基于刺激的模型,它们都很好地再现了数据的所有双耳方面:(1)使用 ITD 方差作为检测标准的单参数检测模型,以及 (2)压缩变换后进行互相关分析。这两种截然不同的模型的成功都表明,仅凭我们的数据就无法揭示 ITD 线索主导的机制。讨论了我们发现的生理学意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adab/2820206/58c068439cc3/10162_2009_185_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验