Beukema Rypko, Beukema Willem P, Sie Hauw T, Misier Anand Ramdat, Delnoy Peter Paul, Elvan Arif
Department of Cardiology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Dec;9(6):956-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.209759. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
Studies have shown that continuous rhythm monitoring enables the detection of significantly more atrial fibrillation (AF) episodes than routine follow-up of patients, i.e. based on perception of symptoms or on 24-48 h Holter monitoring. The positive outcome of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be easily overestimated, especially in patients with paroxysmal AF. Thirty-three consecutive patients, aged 59.4+/-8.9 years (range 38-75 years) participated in this study. All patients had documented AF episodes with an AF duration of 9.4+/-7.1 years (range 1.5-25 years). A new monitoring device, the AF-Alarm was used to more accurately assess the outcome after surgical isolation of pulmonary veins. The AF-Alarm was applied for a duration of 128+/-42.5 h (range 49-191 h) during a period of 8-15 days. The success rate was 87% based on serial electrocardiograms (ECGs) and 24-48 h Holter monitoring during regular outpatient visits. Combination of ECG, Holter and AF-Alarm data yielded a significantly lower success rate, i.e. at the latest follow-up 69% of the patients were free from AF after surgical ablation (P<0.05). Furthermore, the AF-Alarm device demonstrated a dissociation between symptoms and atrial arrhythmic events and confirmed the occurrence of asymptomatic AF episodes. The most important limitation of the AF-Alarm device was noise detection with oversensing and inappropriate detection of non-existing AF episodes in 9% of patients. Long-term follow-up of the patients seems to be essential as success rates of the initial ablation procedure might vary over time. External recorders like the AF-Alarm may be used as an additional tool to document symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes of atrial arrhythmias in the outpatient setting.
研究表明,与对患者进行常规随访(即基于症状感知或24 - 48小时动态心电图监测)相比,持续心律监测能检测出更多的房颤(AF)发作。射频消融(RFA)的积极效果可能很容易被高估,尤其是在阵发性房颤患者中。连续33例年龄为59.4±8.9岁(范围38 - 75岁)的患者参与了本研究。所有患者均有记录的房颤发作,房颤持续时间为9.4±7.1年(范围1.5 - 25年)。一种新的监测设备AF - Alarm被用于更准确地评估肺静脉手术隔离后的效果。AF - Alarm在8 - 15天的时间内应用了128±42.5小时(范围49 - 191小时)。根据定期门诊就诊时的系列心电图(ECG)和24 - 48小时动态心电图监测,成功率为87%。将ECG、动态心电图和AF - Alarm数据相结合得出的成功率显著更低,即在最近一次随访时,69%的患者在手术消融后无房颤发作(P<0.05)。此外,AF - Alarm设备显示出症状与房性心律失常事件之间的分离,并证实了无症状房颤发作的发生。AF - Alarm设备最重要的局限性是在9%的患者中存在噪声检测、感知过度以及对不存在的房颤发作进行不适当检测的情况。由于初始消融手术的成功率可能随时间变化,对患者进行长期随访似乎至关重要。像AF - Alarm这样的外部记录器可作为门诊环境中记录房性心律失常症状性和无症状性发作的额外工具。