DeVries T J, Beauchemin K A, Dohme F, Schwartzkopf-Genswein K S
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta T1J 4B1, Canada.
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Oct;92(10):5067-78. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2102.
An experiment was conducted to determine whether the susceptibility to ruminal acidosis, as defined through differences in days in milk (DIM), milk production level, and ration composition, influences cow feeding, ruminating, and lying behavior and whether these behaviors change during an acute bout of ruminal acidosis. Eight ruminally cannulated cows were assigned to 1 of 2 acidosis risk levels: low risk (LR, mid-lactation cows fed a 60:40 forage:concentrate ratio diet) or high risk (HR, early lactation cows fed a 45:55 forage:concentrate diet). As a result, diets were intentionally confounded with DIM and milk production to represent 2 different acidosis risk scenarios. Cows were exposed to an acidosis challenge in each of three 14-d periods. Each period consisted of 3 baseline days, a feed restriction day (restricting total mixed ration to 50% of ad libitum intake), an acidosis challenge day (1 h meal of 4 kg of ground barley/wheat before allocating the total mixed ration), and a recovery phase. Feeding, rumination, and standing/lying behavior were recorded for 2 baseline days, on the challenge day, and 1 and 4 d after the challenge day for each cow. Across the study, there were no differences in measures of standing, lying, or feeding behavior between the 2 groups of cows. The HR cows did, on average, spend less time ruminating (491 vs. 555 min/d) than the LR cows, resulting in a lesser percentage of observed cows ruminating across the day (44.6 vs. 48.1%). The acidosis challenge resulted in changes in behavior in all cows. Compared with the baseline, feeding time increased on the first day after the challenge (395 vs. 310 min/d), whereas lying time decreased (565 vs. 634 min/d). Rumination time decreased the first day following the challenge (436 min/d) relative to the baseline (533 min/d), but increased the following day (572 min/d). Fewer cows were observed to be ruminating at a given time on the first day following the challenge as compared with the baseline period. Despite this, on a herd level, numerous observations of the proportion of cows ruminating at any one time would need to be taken to accurately detect an acute bout of acidosis using changes in rumination behavior. Overall, these results suggest that risk of acidosis may have little overall effect on general behavior, with the exception of rumination. Furthermore, an acute bout of acidosis alters behavioral patterns of lactating dairy cows, particularly rumination behavior, and identification of these changes in behavior through repeated measurements may assist in the detection of an acidosis event within a herd.
进行了一项实验,以确定根据产奶天数(DIM)、产奶水平和日粮组成差异所定义的瘤胃酸中毒易感性是否会影响奶牛的采食、反刍和躺卧行为,以及这些行为在急性瘤胃酸中毒发作期间是否会发生变化。八头装有瘤胃瘘管的奶牛被分配到两种酸中毒风险水平中的一种:低风险(LR,处于泌乳中期的奶牛,饲喂牧草与精料比例为60:40的日粮)或高风险(HR,处于泌乳早期的奶牛,饲喂牧草与精料比例为45:55的日粮)。因此,日粮有意与产奶天数和产奶量混淆,以代表两种不同的酸中毒风险情况。奶牛在三个14天的时间段内分别接受一次酸中毒挑战。每个时间段包括3天的基线期、一天的限饲期(将全混合日粮限制为自由采食量的50%)、一天的酸中毒挑战期(在分配全混合日粮之前,先给4千克碎大麦/小麦1小时的采食时间)和一个恢复期。记录每头奶牛在2个基线日、挑战日以及挑战日后第1天和第4天的采食、反刍和站立/躺卧行为。在整个研究过程中,两组奶牛在站立、躺卧或采食行为的测量方面没有差异。平均而言,HR组奶牛的反刍时间(491分钟/天对555分钟/天)比LR组奶牛少,导致全天反刍奶牛的百分比更低(44.6%对48.1%)。酸中毒挑战导致所有奶牛的行为发生变化。与基线相比,挑战后第一天的采食时间增加(395分钟/天对310分钟/天),而躺卧时间减少(565分钟/天对634分钟/天)。挑战后第一天的反刍时间相对于基线(533分钟/天)减少(436分钟/天),但第二天增加(572分钟/天)。与基线期相比,挑战后第一天在给定时间观察到反刍的奶牛更少。尽管如此,在畜群水平上,需要对任何时候反刍奶牛的比例进行大量观察,才能利用反刍行为的变化准确检测出急性酸中毒发作。总体而言,这些结果表明,酸中毒风险可能对一般行为总体影响较小,反刍行为除外。此外,急性酸中毒发作会改变泌乳奶牛的行为模式,尤其是反刍行为,通过重复测量识别这些行为变化可能有助于在畜群中检测到酸中毒事件。