Dohme F, DeVries T J, Beauchemin K A
Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux, Research Station ALP, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland.
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Sep;91(9):3554-67. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1264.
The primary objective of this experiment was to determine whether lactating dairy cows that are at high (HR) or low (LR) risk for experiencing ruminal acidosis, because of their diet and stage of lactation, differ in their response to an acidosis challenge. A secondary objective was to determine whether the severity of acidosis changes with repeated challenges. The experiment was a completely randomized design with 2 groups (risk scenarios, HR vs. LR) and 3 periods corresponding to 3 repeated acidosis challenges. Eight lactating ruminally cannulated cows were assigned to 1 of 2 groups: HR, early lactation cows fed a 45% forage diet, or LR, midlactation cows fed a 60% forage diet. Cows were exposed to 3 acidosis challenges, each separated by 14 d. The challenge consisted of restricting total mixed rations to 50% of ad libitum intake for 24 h, followed by a 1-h meal of 4 kg of ground barley-wheat before allocating the total mixed rations. Ruminal pH was measured continuously for 9 of the 14 d each period using an indwelling system. Subacute acidosis (SARA) was described at 2 thresholds: pH <5.8 and pH <5.5. As expected, HR cows had lower ruminal pH profiles (curves) compared with LR cows: mean pH (5.81 vs. 6.21) and nadir pH (5.13 vs. 5.53). The HR cows also experienced SARA to a greater extent than LR cows during the experiment (pH <5.8, 10.6 vs. 3.5 h/d; pH <5.5, 5.9 vs. 1.6 h/d). The pH profiles of cows in both risk categories decreased with each challenge period; mean pH was 6.13, 6.03, 5.77, and nadir pH was 5.52, 5.34, and 5.14 in periods 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The challenges caused a similar decrease in pH for cows in both risk categories, but because the HR cows had a lower baseline pH, they experienced more severe SARA with each subsequent challenge. Feed restriction the day before administering the acidosis challenge caused ruminal pH to gradually increase. On the challenge day, the entire grain allotment was consumed by all cows in period 1, six cows in period 2, and only 3 cows in period 3. The pH plummeted immediately after each grain challenge. Ruminal pH remained very low during the first day after the challenge for all cows, but LR cows began their recovery more quickly than HR cows. Regardless of risk category, with each successive challenge, the pH decrease on the challenge day was more severe: nadir pH on the challenge day was 5.19, 5.07, and 4.90 and duration of SARA (pH <5.8) was 12.2, 13.4, and 15.8 h/d in periods 1, 2, and 3. This study indicates that cows become more prone to acidosis over time even though they decrease intake of the challenge grain to avoid acidosis. The severity of each subsequent bout of acidosis increases, especially for cows fed diets low in physically effective fiber and at high acidosis risk. Therefore, a bout of acidosis that occurs due to improper feed delivery or poor diet formulation can have long-term consequences on cow health and productivity.
本实验的主要目的是确定由于饮食和泌乳阶段而处于瘤胃酸中毒高风险(HR)或低风险(LR)的泌乳奶牛,在应对酸中毒挑战时的反应是否存在差异。次要目的是确定酸中毒的严重程度是否会随着重复挑战而变化。该实验采用完全随机设计,有2组(风险情况,HR与LR)和3个阶段,对应3次重复的酸中毒挑战。8头装有瘤胃瘘管的泌乳奶牛被分配到2组中的1组:HR组为早期泌乳奶牛,饲喂含45%粗饲料的日粮;LR组为中期泌乳奶牛,饲喂含60%粗饲料的日粮。奶牛接受3次酸中毒挑战,每次间隔14天。挑战包括将全混合日粮限制为自由采食量的50%,持续24小时,然后在分配全混合日粮之前,给奶牛1小时采食4千克粉碎大麦 - 小麦的餐食。在每个阶段的14天中,使用植入式系统连续9天测量瘤胃pH值。亚急性酸中毒(SARA)通过2个阈值来描述:pH <5.8和pH <5.5。正如预期的那样,与LR奶牛相比,HR奶牛的瘤胃pH值曲线较低:平均pH值(5.81对6.21)和最低pH值(5.13对5.53)。在实验期间,HR奶牛比LR奶牛经历SARA的程度更大(pH <5.8,10.6对3.5小时/天;pH <5.5,5.9对1.6小时/天)。两个风险类别的奶牛的pH值曲线在每个挑战阶段都下降;在第1、2和3阶段,平均pH值分别为6.13、6.03、5.77,最低pH值分别为5.52、5.34和5.14。挑战导致两个风险类别的奶牛的pH值出现类似程度的下降,但由于HR奶牛的基线pH值较低,它们在每次后续挑战中经历的SARA更严重。在进行酸中毒挑战前一天进行的饲料限制导致瘤胃pH值逐渐升高。在挑战日,第1阶段所有奶牛、第2阶段6头奶牛和第3阶段仅3头奶牛消耗了全部谷物配给量。每次谷物挑战后pH值立即暴跌。在挑战后的第一天,所有奶牛的瘤胃pH值都保持在非常低的水平,但LR奶牛比HR奶牛更快开始恢复。无论风险类别如何,随着每次连续挑战,挑战日的pH值下降更严重:在第1、2和3阶段,挑战日的最低pH值分别为5.