Moore Penny L, Ranchobe Nthabeleng, Lambson Bronwen E, Gray Elin S, Cave Eleanor, Abrahams Melissa-Rose, Bandawe Gama, Mlisana Koleka, Abdool Karim Salim S, Williamson Carolyn, Morris Lynn
AIDS Virus Research Unit, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
PLoS Pathog. 2009 Sep;5(9):e1000598. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000598. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
We previously showed that HIV-1 subtype C viruses elicit potent but highly type-specific neutralizing antibodies (nAb) within the first year of infection. In order to determine the specificity and evolution of these autologous nAbs, we examined neutralization escape in four individuals whose responses against the earliest envelope differed in magnitude and potency. Neutralization escape occurred in all participants, with later viruses showing decreased sensitivity to contemporaneous sera, although they retained sensitivity to new nAb responses. Early nAb responses were very restricted, occurring sequentially and targeting only two regions of the envelope. In V1V2, limited amino acid changes often involving indels or glycans, mediated partial or complete escape, with nAbs targeting the V1V2 region directly in 2 cases. The alpha-2 helix of C3 was also a nAb target, with neutralization escape associated with changes to positively charged residues. In one individual, relatively high titers of anti-C3 nAbs were required to drive genetic escape, taking up to 7 weeks for the resistant variant to predominate. Thereafter titers waned but were still measurable. Development of this single anti-C3 nAb specificity was associated with a 7-fold drop in HIV-1 viral load and a 4-fold rebound as the escape mutation emerged. Overall, our data suggest the development of a very limited number of neutralizing antibody specificities during the early stages of HIV-1 subtype C infection, with temporal fluctuations in specificities as escape occurs. While the mechanism of neutralization escape appears to vary between individuals, the involvement of limited regions suggests there might be common vulnerabilities in the HIV-1 subtype C transmitted envelope.
我们之前表明,HIV-1 C亚型病毒在感染的第一年就会引发强效但高度型特异性的中和抗体(nAb)。为了确定这些自体nAb的特异性和演变,我们检测了四名个体的中和逃逸情况,他们对最早包膜的反应在强度和效力上有所不同。所有参与者都出现了中和逃逸,后期病毒对同期血清的敏感性降低,尽管它们对新的nAb反应仍保持敏感性。早期nAb反应非常有限,依次发生且仅靶向包膜的两个区域。在V1V2区域,有限的氨基酸变化(常涉及插入或缺失或聚糖)介导了部分或完全逃逸,有2例中nAb直接靶向V1V2区域。C3的α-2螺旋也是nAb的靶点,中和逃逸与带正电荷残基的变化有关。在一名个体中,需要相对较高滴度的抗C3 nAb才能驱动基因逃逸,耐药变异体占主导地位需要长达7周时间。此后滴度下降但仍可测量。这种单一抗C3 nAb特异性的出现与HIV-1病毒载量下降7倍以及逃逸突变出现时病毒载量反弹4倍有关。总体而言,我们的数据表明在HIV-1 C亚型感染的早期阶段产生的中和抗体特异性数量非常有限,随着逃逸的发生,特异性会出现时间波动。虽然中和逃逸机制在个体间似乎有所不同,但有限区域的参与表明HIV-1 C亚型传播的包膜可能存在共同的脆弱性。