School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Dec;20(6):827-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00999.x.
Eighteen participants (22-43 years) were randomly allocated to one of two groups: resistance training combined with vibration (VIB; five males, four females) or resistance training alone (CON; five males, four females). Each participant trained three sessions per week (three sets of 10 seated calf raises against a load, which was increased progressively from 75% of one repetition maximum (1RM) to 90% 1RM for 4 weeks. For the VIB group, a vibratory stimulus (30 Hz, 2.5 mm amplitude) was applied to the soles of the feet by a vibration platform. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to the total amount of work performed during training. Both groups showed a significant increase in maximum voluntary contraction and 1RM (P<0.01) with training. There were no significant changes in measures that assessed the rate at which force was developed. Countermovement jump height increased for the CON (P<0.01) but not for the VIB group. Comparisons between the groups revealed that they did not differ significantly from one another with respect to any measure of performance, before or following training. It appears that vibration superimposed upon resistance training does not alter or augment the increase in strength induced by resistance training alone.
18 名参与者（22-43 岁）被随机分配到两组中的一组：抗阻训练联合振动（VIB；5 名男性，4 名女性）或单独抗阻训练（CON；5 名男性，4 名女性）。每个参与者每周训练三次（三组 10 次坐在小腿抬高对抗负荷，负荷从 75%的一次重复最大值（1RM）逐渐增加到 90%1RM，持续 4 周。对于 VIB 组，通过振动平台将振动刺激（30 Hz，2.5 毫米振幅）施加到脚底。两组在训练期间完成的总工作量没有显著差异。两组在最大自主收缩和 1RM 方面均有显著增加（P<0.01）。评估力发展速度的测量值没有显著变化。CON 组的反跳高度增加（P<0.01），但 VIB 组没有。两组之间的比较表明，无论在训练前还是训练后，它们在任何表现测量方面都没有显著差异。看来，抗阻训练叠加振动不会改变或增强单独抗阻训练引起的力量增加。
