• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无细胞百日咳疫苗的改良脑内攻毒试验:全细胞疫苗与无细胞疫苗的比较

Modified intra-cerebral challenge assay for acellular pertussis vaccines: comparisons among whole cell and acellular vaccines.

作者信息

Gaines-Das R, Horiuchi Y, Zhang S M, Newland P, Kim Y, Corbel M, Xing D

机构信息

National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), Blanche Lane, South Mimms, Potters Bar, EN6 3QG, UK.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2009 Nov 16;27(49):6824-32. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.014. Epub 2009 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.014
PMID:19765397
Abstract

The modified intra-cerebral challenge assay for acellular pertussis vaccines is used in Japan, Korea, China and possibly other Asian countries as the potency assay for routine release of acellular pertussis (aP) and combination vaccines. National reference standards, typically of whole cell pertussis (Pw) vaccine, are in use in these countries, but there is no agreed international reference standard for acellular pertussis vaccines. We report here the results of a collaborative study initiated in September 2006 in which fourteen laboratories performing the modified intra-cerebral challenge assay took part. These laboratories compared their various national references of Pw vaccine, the third International Standard for whole cell pertussis vaccine, a previously studied two-component freeze-dried aP vaccine preparation coded JNIH-3, and four different aP vaccines in combination with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. The results of this study show that the modified intra-cerebral challenge assay works reliably although there are inter-laboratory variations in potency estimates. Pw and aP vaccines show apparent differences in dose-response lines in some assay systems. This indicates dissimilarity in performance in at least some of these assay systems. Estimates of relative potency for aP vaccines in terms of the Pw vaccine national or in-house reference preparations differ significantly from one another. Different mouse strains were used in each country and the different strains may also differ in their responsiveness to Pw and aP vaccines. Estimates for different types of aP vaccine formulations show less inter-laboratory variation in terms of JNIH-3 than in terms of the third IS for Pw vaccine and the remaining variation is not apparently related to the different mouse strains. This study thus suggests that an aP vaccine standard would improve inter-laboratory agreement. These data do not show significant dissimilarity in dose-response lines between JNIH-3 and the various vaccine products included, irrespective of the differences in aP components. Available data indicate that JNIH-3 is sufficiently stable to serve as an International Standard. On the basis of these results and with the agreement of the participants, it was proposed that JNIH-3 should be established as an International Standard for acellular pertussis vaccine for use in the modified intra-cerebral challenge assay and other protective bioassays, with an assigned activity of 34 International Units (IU) per ampoule. A WHO Working Group on Standardization of Acellular Pertussis Vaccines: potency assay met in Beijing, China, 7-9 November 2007. This group considered the report of this study, the comments of the participants and implications of the use of JNIH-3 as a reference standard and recommended establishment of JNIH-3 as an International Standard. The results of this study and the report of the Working Group were submitted to the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) of WHO which established JNIH-3 as the first International Standard for acellular pertussis vaccine in the modified intra-cerebral challenge assay and other protective bioassays with an assignment of 34IU per ampoule in October 2008.

摘要

改良脑内攻击试验用于日本、韩国、中国以及可能的其他亚洲国家,作为无细胞百日咳(aP)疫苗和联合疫苗常规放行的效力测定方法。这些国家使用的国家参考标准通常是全细胞百日咳(Pw)疫苗,但尚无公认的无细胞百日咳疫苗国际参考标准。我们在此报告2006年9月启动的一项协作研究的结果,有14个进行改良脑内攻击试验的实验室参与了该研究。这些实验室比较了各自国家的Pw疫苗参考品、全细胞百日咳疫苗第三国际标准品、之前研究过的编码为JNIH - 3的双组分冻干aP疫苗制剂,以及四种不同的与白喉和破伤风类毒素联合的aP疫苗。这项研究的结果表明,尽管效力估计存在实验室间差异,但改良脑内攻击试验的结果可靠。在某些试验系统中,Pw疫苗和aP疫苗在剂量反应曲线上表现出明显差异。这表明至少在其中一些试验系统中性能不同。aP疫苗相对于Pw疫苗国家或内部参考制剂的相对效力估计彼此差异显著。每个国家使用的小鼠品系不同,不同品系对Pw疫苗和aP疫苗的反应性也可能不同。就JNIH - 3而言,不同类型aP疫苗制剂的实验室间差异估计比基于Pw疫苗第三国际标准品的差异要小,其余差异显然与不同小鼠品系无关。因此,这项研究表明aP疫苗标准将提高实验室间的一致性。这些数据并未显示JNIH - 3与所纳入的各种疫苗产品在剂量反应曲线上有显著差异,无论aP组分有何不同。现有数据表明JNIH - 3足够稳定,可作为国际标准。基于这些结果并经参与者同意,提议将JNIH - 3确立为用于改良脑内攻击试验和其他保护性生物测定的无细胞百日咳疫苗国际标准,每安瓿指定活性为34国际单位(IU)。一个无细胞百日咳疫苗标准化世卫组织工作组:效力测定于2007年11月7 - 9日在中国北京召开会议。该小组审议了这项研究的报告、参与者的意见以及使用JNIH - 3作为参考标准的影响,并建议将JNIH - 3确立为国际标准。这项研究的结果和工作组的报告提交给了世卫组织生物标准化专家委员会(ECBS),该委员会于2008年10月将JNIH - 3确立为改良脑内攻击试验和其他保护性生物测定中无细胞百日咳疫苗的首个国际标准,每安瓿指定活性为34IU。

相似文献

1
Modified intra-cerebral challenge assay for acellular pertussis vaccines: comparisons among whole cell and acellular vaccines.无细胞百日咳疫苗的改良脑内攻毒试验:全细胞疫苗与无细胞疫苗的比较
Vaccine. 2009 Nov 16;27(49):6824-32. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.014. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
2
Collaborative study for the standardisation of the histamine sensitizing test in mice and the CHO cell-based assay for the residual toxicity testing of acellular pertussis vaccines.小鼠组胺致敏试验标准化及基于CHO细胞的无细胞百日咳疫苗残留毒性检测协作研究。
Pharmeur Bio Sci Notes. 2010 Apr;2010(1):51-63.
3
WHO working group on standardisation and control of acellular pertussis vaccines--report of a meeting held on 16-17 March 2006, St. Albans, United Kingdom.世界卫生组织无细胞百日咳疫苗标准化和控制工作组——2006年3月16 - 17日于英国圣奥尔本斯召开会议的报告
Vaccine. 2007 Apr 12;25(15):2749-57. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.09.050. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
4
WHO Working Group meeting on standardization of acellular pertussis vaccines: Potency assay Beijing, China, 7-9 November 2007.世界卫生组织无细胞百日咳疫苗标准化工作组会议:效力测定 中国北京,2007年11月7 - 9日
Vaccine. 2008 Jul 29;26(32):3960-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.04.064. Epub 2008 May 15.
5
Calibration of the Ph. Eur. Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for tetanus vaccine (adsorbed) batch 3.欧洲药典破伤风疫苗(吸附)第3批生物参考制剂(BRP)的标定。
Pharmeur Bio Sci Notes. 2011 Jun;2011(1):1-26.
6
Biological standardization of human interferon beta: establishment of a replacement world health organization international biological standard for human glycosylated interferon beta.人β干扰素的生物学标准化:建立世界卫生组织人糖基化β干扰素替代国际生物标准品
J Immunol Methods. 2005 Nov 30;306(1-2):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2005.08.007. Epub 2005 Sep 26.
7
Evaluation of fourth international standard for whole cell pertussis vaccine.
Biologicals. 2010 Nov;38(6):644-51. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2010.07.006. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
8
International collaborative study: evaluation of proposed International Reference Reagent of pertussis antiserum (mouse) 97/642.国际合作研究:对拟议的百日咳抗血清(小鼠)国际参考试剂97/642的评估。
Biologicals. 2001 Jun;29(2):137-48. doi: 10.1006/biol.2001.0288.
9
Collaborative study on a Guinea pig serological method for the assay of acellular pertussis vaccines.豚鼠血清学方法测定无细胞百日咳疫苗的协作研究
Pharmeur Bio Sci Notes. 2009 Oct;2009(1):27-40.
10
Collaborative study for the establishment of tetanus vaccine (adsorbed) Third International Standard and European Pharmacopoeia Biological Reference Preparation batch no. 2.破伤风疫苗(吸附)第三国际标准品和欧洲药典生物参考制剂批号2的协作研究
Pharmeuropa Spec Issue Biol. 2001 Aug;2001(1):45-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of acellular pertussis vaccine: comparisons among different strains of mice.评价无细胞百白破疫苗:不同品系小鼠间的比较。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2023 Dec;12(1):e2192822. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2023.2192822.
2
Evaluation of the Potency of the Pertussis Vaccine in Experimental Infection Model with : Study of the Case of the Pertussis Vaccine Used in the Expanded Vaccination Program in Algeria.在实验性感染模型中评估百日咳疫苗的效力:以阿尔及利亚扩大免疫规划中使用的百日咳疫苗为例的研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jun 6;10(6):906. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10060906.
3
Characterization of co-purified acellular pertussis vaccines.
共纯化无细胞百日咳疫苗的特性分析
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(2):421-7. doi: 10.4161/21645515.2014.988549.
4
Relationship of immunogenicity to protective potency in acellular pertussis vaccines.无细胞百日咳疫苗中免疫原性与保护效力的关系。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(7):2066-73. doi: 10.4161/hv.28765.