Suppr超能文献

三种抗疟方案用于婴儿疟疾间歇性预防治疗的保护效果及安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验

Protective efficacy and safety of three antimalarial regimens for intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in infants: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Gosling Roly D, Gesase Samwel, Mosha Jacklin F, Carneiro Ilona, Hashim Ramadhan, Lemnge Martha, Mosha Frank W, Greenwood Brian, Chandramohan Daniel

机构信息

Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2009 Oct 31;374(9700):1521-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60997-1. Epub 2009 Sep 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Administration of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine at times of vaccination-intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi)-is a promising strategy to prevent malaria. However, rising resistance to this combination is a concern. We investigated a shortacting and longacting antimalarial drug as alternative regimens for IPTi.

METHODS

We undertook a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of IPTi in an area of high resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine at sites of moderate (n=1280 infants enrolled) and low (n=1139) intensity of malaria transmission in Tanzania. Infants aged 8-16 weeks were randomly assigned in blocks of 16 to sulfadoxine (250 mg) plus pyrimethamine (12.5 mg; n=319 in moderate-transmission and 283 in low-transmission sites), chlorproguanil (15 mg) plus dapsone (18.75 mg; n=317 and 285), mefloquine (125 mg; n=320 and 284), or placebo (n=320 and 284), given at the second and third immunisations for diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus, and for measles. Research team and child were masked to treatment. Recruitment was stopped early at the low-transmission site because of low malaria incidence. The primary endpoint was protective efficacy against all episodes of clinical malaria at 2-11 months of age. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00158574.

FINDINGS

All randomly assigned infants were analysed. At the moderate-transmission site, mefloquine had a protective efficacy of 38.1% (95% CI 11.8-56.5, p=0.008) against clinical malaria in infants aged 2-11 months, but neither sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (-6.7%, -45.9 to 22.0) nor chlorproguanil-dapsone (10.8%, -24.6 to 36.1) had a protective effect. No regimen had any protective efficacy against anaemia or hospital admission. Mefloquine caused vomiting in 141 of 1731 (8%) doses given on day 1 (odds ratio vs placebo 5.50, 95% CI 3.56-8.46). More infants died in the chlorproguanil-dapsone and mefloquine groups (18 and 15, respectively) than in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or placebo groups (eight deaths per group; p=0.05 for difference between chlorproguanil-dapsone and placebo).

INTERPRETATION

IPTi with a longacting, efficacious drug such as mefloquine can reduce episodes of malaria in infants in a moderate-transmission setting. IPTi with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine has no benefit in areas of very high resistance to this combination. The appropriateness of IPTi should be measured by the expected incidence of malaria and the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the drug.

FUNDING

IPTi Consortium and the Gates Malaria Partnership.

摘要

背景

在婴儿疫苗接种时(间歇性预防治疗,IPTi)给予周效磺胺-乙胺嘧啶是预防疟疾的一项很有前景的策略。然而,对这种联合用药的耐药性不断上升令人担忧。我们研究了一种短效和长效抗疟药物作为IPTi的替代方案。

方法

在坦桑尼亚疟疾传播强度为中度(纳入1280名婴儿)和低度(1139名)且对周效磺胺-乙胺嘧啶高度耐药的地区,我们开展了一项IPTi的双盲、安慰剂对照试验。8至16周龄的婴儿按16人一组进行随机分组,分别给予周效磺胺(250毫克)加乙胺嘧啶(12.5毫克;中度传播地区319名,低度传播地区283名)、氯胍(15毫克)加达普宋(18.75毫克;317名和285名)、甲氟喹(任选其一)(125毫克;320名和284名)或安慰剂(320名和284名),在白喉、百日咳、破伤风和麻疹的第二次及第三次免疫接种时给药。研究团队和儿童均对治疗方案不知情。由于疟疾发病率低,低度传播地区的招募提前停止。主要终点是2至11月龄时针对所有临床疟疾发作的保护效力。分析采用意向性分析。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT00158574。

结果

对所有随机分组的婴儿进行了分析。在中度传播地区,甲氟喹对2至11月龄婴儿临床疟疾的保护效力为38.1%(95%CI 11.8 - 56.5,p = 0.008),但周效磺胺-乙胺嘧啶(-6.7%,-45.9至22.0)和氯胍-达普宋(10.8%,-24.6至36.1)均无保护作用。没有任何一种方案对贫血或住院有保护效力。甲氟喹在第1天给药的1731剂中有141剂(8%)引起呕吐(与安慰剂相比的比值比为5.50,95%CI 3.5� - 8.46)。氯胍-达普宋组和甲氟喹组死亡的婴儿更多(分别为18例和15例),多于周效磺胺-乙胺嘧啶组或安慰剂组(每组8例死亡;氯胍-达普宋组与安慰剂组之间差异的p值为0.05)。

解读

使用甲氟喹这种长效、有效的药物进行IPTi可减少中度传播环境下婴儿的疟疾发作次数。在对这种联合用药具有极高耐药性的地区,使用周效磺胺-乙胺嘧啶进行IPTi没有益处。IPTi的适用性应以预期的疟疾发病率以及药物的效力、耐受性和安全性来衡量。

资助

IPTi联盟和盖茨疟疾合作组织。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验