• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
ACS-NSQIP has the potential to create an HPB-NSQIP option.ACS-NSQIP 有可能创建一个 HPB-NSQIP 选项。
HPB (Oxford). 2009 Aug;11(5):405-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00074.x.
2
Risk of morbidity and mortality following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery.肝胰胆手术后的发病率和死亡率风险。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Sep;16(9):1727-35. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1938-y. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
3
Comparison of Two National Databases for General Thoracic Surgery.两个普通胸外科国家数据库的比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Oct;100(4):1155-61; discussion 1161-2. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.031. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
4
Pancreatic necrosectomy: North American mortality is much lower than expected.胰腺坏死组织清除术:北美的死亡率远低于预期。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Dec;209(6):712-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.08.009. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
5
American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program as a quality-measurement tool for advanced cancer patients.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划作为晚期癌症患者的质量测量工具。
Ann Palliat Med. 2015 Oct;4(4):200-6. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-5820.2015.10.01.
6
The impact of chronic liver disease on the risk assessment of ACS NSQIP morbidity and mortality after hepatic resection.慢性肝病对肝切除术后ACS NSQIP发病率和死亡率风险评估的影响。
Surgery. 2016 May;159(5):1308-15. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.11.020. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
7
Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Publications in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Research Using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database.运用美国外科医师学院 NSQIP 数据库对肝胆胰外科研究出版物质量的批判性评估。
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Mar 1;236(3):449-460. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000477. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
8
Association of hospital participation in a surgical outcomes monitoring program with inpatient complications and mortality.医院参与手术结果监测计划与住院患者并发症和死亡率的关联。
JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):505-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.90.
9
Patterns of care among patients undergoing hepatic resection: a query of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-targeted hepatectomy database.肝切除患者的护理模式:对国家外科质量改进计划靶向肝切除数据库的一项查询
J Surg Res. 2015 Jun 15;196(2):221-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
10
Morbidity and Mortality of Non-pancreatectomy operations for pancreatic cancer: An ACS-NSQIP analysis.胰腺癌非胰腺切除术的发病率和死亡率:ACS-NSQIP 分析。
Am J Surg. 2023 Feb;225(2):315-321. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning model for postpancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage prediction: an international multicentre cohort study.用于胰十二指肠切除术后出血预测的机器学习模型:一项国际多中心队列研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 16;15(7):e096147. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096147.
2
Inter-rater variability for the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification in patients undergoing hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery (MILESTONE-2): international survey among surgeons and anaesthesiologists.肝胰胆手术患者美国麻醉医师协会分级的评分者间变异性(MILESTONE-2):外科医生和麻醉医生的国际调查
BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae162.
3
Transatlantic differences in the use and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: an international multi-registry analysis.微创胰十二指肠切除术使用情况及结局的跨大西洋差异:一项国际多登记处分析
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7099-7111. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11161-7. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
4
A NSQIP-Based Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Choice of Prophylactic Antibiotics for Pancreaticoduodenectomy.基于 NSQIP 的随机临床试验评估胰腺十二指肠切除术预防性抗生素的选择。
Cancer Treat Res. 2024;192:131-145. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-61238-1_7.
5
Development and validation of a novel predictive model for postpancreatectomy hemorrhage using lasso-logistic regression: an international multicenter observational study of 9631 pancreatectomy patients.使用套索逻辑回归开发并验证一种用于胰十二指肠切除术后出血的新型预测模型:一项对9631例胰十二指肠切除术患者的国际多中心观察性研究。
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):791-806. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001883.
6
Hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery in West Africa: a timely capacity assessment.西非的肝胆胰外科学:及时的能力评估。
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Sep;26(9):1123-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 May 22.
7
The effect of an intraoperative patient-specific, surgery-specific haemodynamic algorithm in improving textbook outcomes for hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery: a multicentre retrospective study.术中针对患者及手术的血流动力学算法对改善肝胆胰手术标准预后的效果:一项多中心回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2024 May 27;11:1353143. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1353143. eCollection 2024.
8
Quality of Surgical Care Within the Criminal Justice Health Care System.刑事司法医疗保健系统中的外科护理质量。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Feb 1;159(2):179-184. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6236.
9
Complications and failure-to-rescue after pancreatectomy and hospital participation in the targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry.胰腺切除术后的并发症和救援失败,以及医院参与美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划登记处的情况。
Surgery. 2023 Nov;174(5):1235-1240. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.023. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
10
Assessing the Feasibility and Effects of Introducing the USA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program on Clinical Outcomes and Cost in Saudi Arabia: An Observational Study.评估引入美国国家外科质量改进计划对沙特阿拉伯临床结局和成本的可行性及影响:一项观察性研究。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2020 Feb 11;3(1):14-21. doi: 10.4103/JQSH.JQSH_1_20. eCollection 2020 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Obesity, diabetes, and smoking are important determinants of resource utilization in liver resection: a multicenter analysis of 1029 patients.肥胖、糖尿病和吸烟是肝切除术中资源利用的重要决定因素:对1029例患者的多中心分析
Ann Surg. 2009 Mar;249(3):414-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819a032d.
2
Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.美国外科医师学会新蓝图:国家外科质量改进计划
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):777-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.07.018. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
3
Primary sclerosing cholangitis: role of extrahepatic biliary resection.原发性硬化性胆管炎:肝外胆管切除术的作用
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 May;206(5):822-30; discussion 830-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.015. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
4
Morbidity and mortality after liver resection: results of the patient safety in surgery study.肝切除术后的发病率和死亡率:外科手术患者安全研究结果
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.067.
5
Pancreatic resection in Veterans Affairs and selected university medical centers: results of the patient safety in surgery study.退伍军人事务部及部分大学医学中心的胰腺切除术:外科手术患者安全研究结果
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1252-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.015.
6
Liver resection in veterans affairs and selected university medical centers: results of the patient safety in surgery study.退伍军人事务部及部分大学医学中心的肝切除术:外科手术患者安全研究结果
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1242-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.069.
7
Relationship of processes and structures of care in general surgery to postoperative outcomes: a hierarchical analysis.
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1166-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.023.
8
Comparison of risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals and selected university medical centers: general surgical operations in women.退伍军人事务部医院与部分大学医学中心经风险调整后的术后30天死亡率和发病率比较:女性普通外科手术
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1127-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.060.
9
Comparison of risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals and selected university medical centers: general surgical operations in men.退伍军人事务部医院与部分大学医学中心经风险调整后的术后30天死亡率和发病率比较:男性普通外科手术
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.068.
10
The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations.外科手术中的患者安全研究:背景、研究设计及患者群体
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1089-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.028.

ACS-NSQIP 有可能创建一个 HPB-NSQIP 选项。

ACS-NSQIP has the potential to create an HPB-NSQIP option.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2009 Aug;11(5):405-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00074.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00074.x
PMID:19768145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2742610/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was started in 2004. Presently, 58% of the 198 hospitals participating in ACS-NSQIP are academic or teaching hospitals. In 2008, ACS-NSQIP initiated a number of changes and made risk-adjusted data available for use by participating hospitals. This analysis explores the ACS-NSQIP database for utility in developing hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery-specific outcomes (HPB-NSQIP).

METHODS

The ACS-NSQIP Participant Use File was queried for patient demographics and outcomes for 49 HPB operations from 1 January 2005 through 31 December 2007. The procedures included six hepatic, 16 pancreatic and 23 complex biliary operations. Four laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy operations were also studied. Risk-adjusted probabilities for morbidity and mortality were compared with observed rates for each operation.

RESULTS

During this 36-month period, data were accumulated on 9723 patients who underwent major HPB surgery, as well as on 44,189 who received cholecystectomies. The major HPB operations included 2847 hepatic (29%), 5074 pancreatic (52%) and 1802 complex biliary (19%) procedures. Patients undergoing hepatic resections were more likely to have metastatic disease (42%) and recent chemotherapy (7%), whereas those undergoing complex biliary procedures were more likely to have significant weight loss (20%), diabetes (13%) and ascites (5%). Morbidity was high for hepatic, pancreatic and complex biliary operations (20.1%, 32.4% and 21.2%, respectively), whereas mortality was low (2.3%, 2.7% and 2.7%, respectively). Compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the open operation was associated with higher rates of morbidity (19.2% vs. 6.0%) and mortality (2.5% vs. 0.3%). The ratios between observed and expected morbidity and mortality rates were <1.0 for hepatic, pancreatic and biliary operations.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that HPB operations performed at ACS-NSQIP hospitals have acceptable outcomes. However, the creation of an HPB-NSQIP has the potential to improve quality, provide risk-adjusted registries with HPB-specific data and facilitate multi-institutional clinical trials.

摘要

背景

美国外科医师学院国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)于 2004 年启动。目前,参与 ACS-NSQIP 的 198 家医院中有 58%是学术或教学医院。2008 年,ACS-NSQIP 进行了多项改革,并为参与医院提供了风险调整后数据。本分析利用 ACS-NSQIP 数据库开发肝胰胆(HPB)手术特定结局(HPB-NSQIP)。

方法

查询 ACS-NSQIP 参与者使用文件,获取 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2007 年 12 月 31 日期间 49 例 HPB 手术的患者人口统计学和结局数据。这些手术包括 6 例肝切除术、16 例胰切除术和 23 例复杂胆道手术。还研究了 4 例腹腔镜或开放胆囊切除术。将发病率和死亡率的风险调整概率与每种手术的观察率进行比较。

结果

在这 36 个月期间,共收集了 9723 例接受主要 HPB 手术和 44189 例胆囊切除术患者的数据。主要 HPB 手术包括 2847 例肝切除术(29%)、5074 例胰切除术(52%)和 1802 例复杂胆道手术(19%)。行肝切除术的患者更有可能患有转移性疾病(42%)和近期化疗(7%),而行复杂胆道手术的患者更有可能出现显著体重减轻(20%)、糖尿病(13%)和腹水(5%)。肝、胰和复杂胆道手术的发病率较高(分别为 20.1%、32.4%和 21.2%),而死亡率较低(分别为 2.3%、2.7%和 2.7%)。与腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比,开放手术的发病率(19.2%比 6.0%)和死亡率(2.5%比 0.3%)更高。肝、胰和胆道手术的观察到的发病率和死亡率与预期发病率和死亡率的比值均<1.0。

结论

这些数据表明,在 ACS-NSQIP 医院进行的 HPB 手术具有可接受的结局。然而,创建一个 HPB-NSQIP 有潜力改善质量,为 HPB 特定数据提供风险调整登记,并促进多机构临床试验。