Parajuli K, Hanchana S, Inwong M, Pukrittayakayamee S, Ghimire P
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Medicine Maharajgunj Campus, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Nepal Med Coll J. 2009 Mar;11(1):23-7.
Microscopy has been the most common technique for the diagnosis of malaria in Nepal. This study was undertaken at CDM, TU, Kathmandu, and Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok to compare the efficiency of microscopy and PCR for malaria diagnosis in Nepalese context. During July-August 2007, blood samples were collected in glass slides and on filter papers from suspected malaria cases of Kanchanpur, Jhapa and Morang Districts. Sample transportation and storage was done using standard protocol. Microscopy was done at the heath posts in the district in Nepal while Nested PCR using previously standardized primers was carried out at Mahidol University. Among 824 malaria suspected cases, 19.2% (157) were laboratory confirmed as malaria cases (P. vivax 10.9%, P. falciparium 7.7% and 0.4% were of mixed infection) by microscopy. The parasite count range was detected as 320-25020 parasites/microl. Among total 132 samples (114 microscopic positive, 18 negative) were processed for nested PCR. Among microscopic positive samples with increase of the parasitaemia/microl of the blood, the rate of detection by PCR (75.4%) was increased though the PCR failed to detect 2 cases having the parasitaemia 5000-15000/microl of blood however 4 microscopic negative cases were detected as P. vivax infection. Among the microscopy positive samples for P. falciparum, 3 were found P. vivax and 2 were found as mixed infection of Pv and Pf and 6 P. vivax were found positive for P. falciparum by PCR. Two microscopy positive samples for mixed infection were found be positive for one Pv and one Pf by PCR. PCR could be good tool in confirming the clinically strongly suspected but microscopically negative malaria cases and advanced molecular epidemiological studies, although its use in routine diagnosis may not be feasible.
显微镜检查一直是尼泊尔诊断疟疾最常用的技术。本研究在加德满都的特里布万大学医学院(CDM, TU)以及曼谷的玛希隆大学临床热带医学系开展,旨在比较在尼泊尔背景下显微镜检查和聚合酶链反应(PCR)诊断疟疾的效率。2007年7月至8月期间,从坎昌普尔、贾帕和莫朗地区的疑似疟疾病例中采集了载玻片和滤纸上的血样。样本的运输和储存按照标准方案进行。在尼泊尔各地区的卫生所进行显微镜检查,而在玛希隆大学使用先前标准化的引物进行巢式PCR。在824例疑似疟疾病例中,通过显微镜检查,19.2%(157例)被实验室确认为疟疾病例(间日疟原虫占10.9%,恶性疟原虫占7.7%,混合感染占0.4%)。检测到的寄生虫计数范围为320 - 25020个寄生虫/微升。总共对132份样本(114份显微镜检查阳性,18份阴性)进行了巢式PCR检测。在显微镜检查阳性样本中,随着每微升血液中疟原虫血症的增加,PCR检测率(75.4%)有所提高,不过PCR未能检测到2例每微升血液中疟原虫血症为5000 - 15000的病例,但4例显微镜检查阴性病例被检测为间日疟原虫感染。在显微镜检查为恶性疟原虫阳性的样本中,3例被发现为间日疟原虫,2例被发现为间日疟原虫和恶性疟原虫的混合感染,6例间日疟原虫样本通过PCR检测为恶性疟原虫阳性。2例显微镜检查为混合感染阳性的样本通过PCR检测为1例间日疟原虫和1例恶性疟原虫阳性。PCR可能是确认临床高度怀疑但显微镜检查阴性的疟疾病例以及进行高级分子流行病学研究的良好工具,尽管其用于常规诊断可能不可行。