Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Jul;17(7):1101-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03344.x. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
Although microscopy remains the reference standard for malaria diagnosis, molecular tools are attracting increasing interest. To improve the detection of mixed infections, we developed a four-primer real-time PCR with four Plasmodium species-specific forward primers, based on the pan-primer design with universal Plasmodium primers as described previously. After validation for analytical sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility, the four-primer PCR was evaluated on 351 blood samples from patients presenting at the outpatient clinic of the Institute of Tropical Medicine (Belgium). With the four-primer PCR, we identified 188 Plasmodium falciparum (Pf), 54 Plasmodium vivax (Pv), 52 Plasmodium ovale (Po) and 13 Plasmodium malariae (Pm) single infections, 27 mixed infections (14 Pf + Pm; 12 Pf + Po; one Pv + Pm) and 17 negative specimens. We found lower cycle threshold values than with the pan-primer PCR, with a mean difference of 2.23, a higher analytical sensitivity (in asexual parasites/μL: Pf/Pv, 0.02; Po, 0.004; Pm, 0.006) and 15 extra mixed infections. As compared with microscopy, 17 extra mixed infections were detected and Plasmodium species were identified in four microscopy-positive samples in which species identification was not possible. Additionally, the PCR corrected 13 species mismatches between Po and Pv, and in 11 cases detected Pf as a second species that was not identified by microscopy and in five of them was not detected by rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). PCR confirmed the presence of Pf in 30/46 histidine-rich protein-2-positive samples that were microscopy-negative. We conclude that the presently developed four-primer real-time PCR is complementary to standard malaria diagnostic tests in clinical laboratories, with an added value for simultaneous identification of the four Plasmodium species and the detection of mixed infections.
虽然显微镜检查仍然是疟疾诊断的参考标准,但分子工具越来越受到关注。为了提高混合感染的检测能力,我们基于以前描述的通用疟原虫引物的泛引物设计,开发了一种具有四个疟原虫种特异性正向引物的四引物实时 PCR。在验证了分析灵敏度、特异性和重现性后,我们在热带医学研究所(比利时)门诊就诊的 351 名患者的血液样本中评估了四引物 PCR。使用四引物 PCR,我们鉴定了 188 例恶性疟原虫(Pf)、54 例间日疟原虫(Pv)、52 例卵形疟原虫(Po)和 13 例三日疟原虫(Pm)的单一感染,27 例混合感染(14 例 Pf + Pm;12 例 Pf + Po;一例 Pv + Pm)和 17 例阴性标本。我们发现与泛引物 PCR 相比,循环阈值较低,平均差异为 2.23,分析灵敏度更高(无性寄生虫/μL:Pf/Pv,0.02;Po,0.004;Pm,0.006),并且额外检测到 15 例混合感染。与显微镜检查相比,我们额外检测到 17 例混合感染,并在 4 例显微镜阳性样本中鉴定出无法通过显微镜鉴定的疟原虫种。此外,PCR 纠正了 Po 和 Pv 之间的 13 个种属错误,在 11 例中检测到 Pf 作为第二种未被显微镜识别的疟原虫种,在其中 5 例中未被快速诊断检测(RDT)检测到。PCR 确认了 30/46 例富含组氨酸蛋白-2 阳性但显微镜阴性样本中 Pf 的存在。我们得出结论,目前开发的四引物实时 PCR 是临床实验室标准疟疾诊断检测的补充,具有同时鉴定四种疟原虫种和检测混合感染的附加价值。