Suppr超能文献

急性冠状动脉综合征中未察觉的治疗差距。

Unperceived treatment gaps in acute coronary syndromes.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Flinders University & Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Oct;63(10):1456-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02182.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite a strong evidence-base for several therapies recommended in the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), many patients do not receive these therapies. The barriers preventing translation of evidence into practice are incompletely understood. The aim of this study was to survey clinicians regarding barriers to implementing recommendations of recently published national clinical guidelines and to determine the extent to which these impact clinical practice.

METHODS

A survey of clinicians at hospitals included in Australian Collaborative Acute Coronary Syndromes Prospective Audit (ACACIA, n = 3402, PML0051) was conducted, measuring self-stated knowledge, beliefs and guideline-concordant behaviours in relation to their care of ACS patients. Correlations between individual respondents' self-estimated rates and clinician's institutional rates of guideline-concordant behaviours were performed.

RESULTS

Most respondents (n = 50/86, 58%) were aware of current guidelines and their scope, achieving 7/10 (Interquartile Range (IQR) = 2) median score on knowledge questions. Belief in benefits and agreement with guideline-recommended therapy was high. However, none of these factors correlated with increased use of guideline therapies. Apart from clopidogrel (r(s) = 0.28, p < 0.01) and early interventional therapy for high-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (r(s) = 0.31, p < 0.01), there were no significant correlations between individual clinicians' self-estimated rates of guideline-concordant practice and rates recorded in ACACIA data for their respective institution.

CONCLUSION

Beliefs about practice do not match actual practice. False beliefs regarding levels of evidence-based practice may contribute to inadequate implementation of evidence-based guidelines. Strategies such as continuous real-time audit and feedback of information for the delivery of care may help clinicians understand their levels of practice better and improve care.

摘要

背景

尽管有大量证据支持急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)管理中推荐的几种治疗方法,但许多患者并未接受这些治疗。将证据转化为实践的障碍尚未完全了解。本研究旨在调查临床医生在实施最近发表的国家临床指南推荐方面的障碍,并确定这些障碍对临床实践的影响程度。

方法

对参与澳大利亚合作急性冠状动脉综合征前瞻性审核(ACACIA)的医院的临床医生进行了一项调查(n=3402,PML0051),测量了他们在 ACS 患者护理方面的自我评估知识、信念和与指南一致的行为。对每个受访者自我估计的比率与临床医生机构指南一致行为的比率进行了相关性分析。

结果

大多数受访者(n=50/86,58%)了解当前指南及其范围,在知识问题上获得了 7/10(四分位距(IQR)=2)的中位数得分。对益处的信念和对指南推荐治疗的一致认同度很高。然而,这些因素都与指南治疗方法的使用增加无关。除氯吡格雷(r(s)=0.28,p<0.01)和高危非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的早期介入治疗(r(s)=0.31,p<0.01)外,个别临床医生自我估计的指南一致实践比率与 ACACIA 数据中各自机构记录的比率之间没有显著相关性。

结论

实践信念与实际实践不符。对基于证据的实践水平的错误信念可能导致对基于证据的指南的实施不足。例如,通过连续实时审核和提供护理信息的反馈,可以帮助临床医生更好地了解自己的实践水平,并改善护理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验