Berinstein Neil L
Departments of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Sep;1174:107-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04935.x.
Although there has been initial success with some types of immunotherapy, such as adoptive cellular therapy and monoclonal antibody therapy for cancer, the experience with therapeutic cancer vaccines has been much less encouraging. Almost all randomized phase III trials testing therapeutic cancer vaccines have failed to meet their end points. There are several potential explanations for this, ranging from factors related to the clinical trial design and the vaccine itself. Perhaps the most important are host-related factors. Specifically, progression and metastases of many cancers are associated with induction of multiple cancer-specific immune-inhibitory pathways. These inhibitory pathways include induction of T-cell anergy through dendritic cell dysfunction, release of immunosuppressive cytokines, T-cell exhaustion through inhibitory T-cell signaling and T regulatory cell-mediated tumor-specific immune suppression. All of these pathways have been shown to be operational in patients with melanoma. To enhance the activity of therapeutic cancer vaccines, these immunosupressive pathways need to be addressed and reversed. A number of new immunomodulatory reagents that are able to interfere with some of these pathways are now being assessed in the clinic. Sanofi Pasteur designed a clinical trial in patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma that is intended to both induce tumor-specific T-cell responses and modulate or reverse some of the immune suppression pathways that the melanoma has induced. To accomplish this, the recently optimized ALVAC melanoma multi-antigen vaccine is administered with high doses of IFN-alpha. Clinical trial parameters have also been optimized to enhance the likelihood of inducing and documenting antitumor activity. Success with other therapeutic cancer vaccine approaches will likely require similar approaches in which promising immunogenic vaccines are integrated with biologically and clinically active immunomodulatory reagents.
尽管某些类型的免疫疗法已取得初步成功,例如癌症的过继性细胞疗法和单克隆抗体疗法,但治疗性癌症疫苗的经验却远不那么令人鼓舞。几乎所有测试治疗性癌症疫苗的随机III期试验都未能达到其终点。对此有几种潜在的解释,范围从与临床试验设计和疫苗本身相关的因素。也许最重要的是宿主相关因素。具体而言,许多癌症的进展和转移与多种癌症特异性免疫抑制途径的诱导有关。这些抑制途径包括通过树突状细胞功能障碍诱导T细胞无反应性、释放免疫抑制细胞因子、通过抑制性T细胞信号传导导致T细胞耗竭以及调节性T细胞介导的肿瘤特异性免疫抑制。所有这些途径在黑色素瘤患者中均已显示起作用。为了增强治疗性癌症疫苗的活性,需要解决并逆转这些免疫抑制途径。目前一些能够干扰其中一些途径的新型免疫调节试剂正在临床中进行评估。赛诺菲巴斯德公司针对晚期或转移性黑色素瘤患者设计了一项临床试验,旨在诱导肿瘤特异性T细胞反应,并调节或逆转黑色素瘤所诱导的一些免疫抑制途径。为实现这一目标,将最近优化的ALVAC黑色素瘤多抗原疫苗与高剂量的α干扰素联合使用。临床试验参数也已得到优化,以提高诱导和记录抗肿瘤活性的可能性。其他治疗性癌症疫苗方法的成功可能需要类似的方法,即将有前景的免疫原性疫苗与具有生物学和临床活性的免疫调节试剂相结合。