• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髂螺钉置入深度对腰骶髂固定结构稳定性和强度的影响:解剖学和生物力学研究。

Effect of iliac screw insertion depth on the stability and strength of lumbo-iliac fixation constructs: an anatomical and biomechanical study.

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guang-zhou, China.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 15;34(16):E565-72. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ac8fc4.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ac8fc4
PMID:19770599
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Comparison of feasibility and safety of the placement of short and long iliac screws by anatomic and biomechanical evaluations as they apply to lumbo-iliac fixation construct.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the stability of the short and long iliac screw fixations for lumbo-iliac reconstruction by anatomic and biomechanical evaluations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinopelvic reconstruction remains a challenge to spine surgeons. Despite the advent of many fixation methods, the use of iliac screws seems most favorable so far. Various lengths of iliac screws are applied in surgical treatments; however, no biomechanical comparison has been reported based on the screw length.

METHODS

For anatomic observation, CT scan data of 60 Chinese adults were used to measure the details of the iliac spine structures. For biomechanical evaluation, 7 adult human cadavers (L3-pelvis) were observed. L4-S1 pedicle screw fixation was performed with posterior spinal fixation system. On the basis of the lengths of iliac screws, 2 groups were tested (short screw group using 70 mm screws and long screw group using 138 mm screws). In this study, short and long iliac screws were placed in the same specimen. Biomechanical testing was performed on a material testing machine under 800 N compression and 7 Nm torsion loading modes for stiffness evaluations. Finally, pullout testing was performed for all the iliac screws to measure the maximum pullout force.

RESULTS

The length of the line between posterior superior iliac spine and anterior inferior iliac spine was 140.6 +/- 1.1 mm, and the distance between this line and the greater sciatic notch was 18.3 +/- 0.8 mm. The length of the line between posterior superior iliac spine and the second narrowest point was 67.1 +/- 0.62 mm in men and 70.1 +/- 1.4 mm in women. Insertion lengths of the short and long iliac screws were 70 +/- 2 mm and 138 +/- 4 mm, respectively. The lumbo-pelvic reconstruction using short and long iliac screws restored 53.3% +/- 13.6% and 57.6% +/- 16.2% of the initial stiffness in compression testing respectively. In torsion testing, the use of short and long iliac screws harvested 55.1% +/- 11.9% and 62.5% +/- 9.2% of the initial stiffness, respectively. No significant difference was detected between the 2 reconstructions in terms of compressive and torsional stiffness (P > 0.05). However, the maximum pullout strength of long iliac screw group was significantly higher than the short screw group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The local stability is rather difficult to be restored to the original levels regardless the length of iliac screws. Obviously, long iliac screws resisted significantly greater axial pullout force. However, under physiologic, torsional, and compressive loading conditions, the mechanical stability of lumbo-pelvic fixation construct with short iliac screws was comparable with that of the long ones. Therefore, the use of short iliac screws, which are only about half the length of the long iliac screws, could reduce the implantation risk without significantly compromising on the stability of the construct.

摘要

研究设计

通过解剖学和生物力学评估比较短和长髂螺钉放置的可行性和安全性,适用于腰骶髂固定结构。

目的

通过解剖学和生物力学评估比较短和长髂螺钉固定腰骶重建的稳定性。

背景资料总结

脊柱骨盆重建仍然是脊柱外科医生面临的挑战。尽管出现了许多固定方法,但迄今为止,使用髂螺钉似乎是最有利的。在手术治疗中应用了各种长度的髂螺钉;然而,基于螺钉长度,尚未进行生物力学比较。

方法

为了解剖学观察,使用 60 名中国成年人的 CT 扫描数据测量髂棘结构的详细信息。对于生物力学评估,观察了 7 具成人尸体(L3-骨盆)。使用后路脊柱固定系统进行 L4-S1 椎弓根螺钉固定。根据髂螺钉的长度,将 2 组进行测试(使用 70mm 螺钉的短螺钉组和使用 138mm 螺钉的长螺钉组)。在这项研究中,短和长髂螺钉被放置在相同的标本中。在 800N 压缩和 7Nm 扭转加载模式下在材料试验机上进行生物力学测试,以评估刚度。最后,对所有髂螺钉进行拔出测试,以测量最大拔出力。

结果

后上髂棘和前下髂棘之间的线的长度为 140.6 +/- 1.1mm,这条线与坐骨大切迹之间的距离为 18.3 +/- 0.8mm。后上髂棘与第二最窄点之间的线的长度在男性为 67.1 +/- 0.62mm,在女性为 70.1 +/- 1.4mm。短和长髂螺钉的插入长度分别为 70 +/- 2mm 和 138 +/- 4mm。短和长髂螺钉的腰骶骨盆重建分别恢复了初始压缩测试中 53.3% +/- 13.6%和 57.6% +/- 16.2%的初始刚度。在扭转测试中,使用短和长髂螺钉分别获得了初始刚度的 55.1% +/- 11.9%和 62.5% +/- 9.2%。在压缩和扭转刚度方面,两种重建之间没有检测到显著差异(P > 0.05)。然而,长髂螺钉组的最大拔出强度明显高于短螺钉组(P < 0.05)。

结论

无论髂螺钉的长度如何,局部稳定性都很难恢复到原始水平。显然,长髂螺钉抵抗了更大的轴向拔出力。然而,在生理、扭转和压缩载荷条件下,短髂螺钉腰骶骨盆固定结构的力学稳定性与长髂螺钉相当。因此,使用长度约为长髂螺钉一半的短髂螺钉可以降低植入风险,而不会显著影响结构的稳定性。

相似文献

1
Effect of iliac screw insertion depth on the stability and strength of lumbo-iliac fixation constructs: an anatomical and biomechanical study.髂螺钉置入深度对腰骶髂固定结构稳定性和强度的影响:解剖学和生物力学研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 15;34(16):E565-72. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ac8fc4.
2
[Biomechanical effect of the iliac screw insertion depth on lumbo-iliac fixation construct].髂骨螺钉置入深度对腰骶髂固定结构的生物力学影响
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Aug 1;46(15):1179-82.
3
[Biomechanical effects of iliac screw plates on stability of lumbo-iliac fixation construct].[髂骨螺钉钢板对腰骶髂固定结构稳定性的生物力学影响]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 May;27(5):606-11.
4
Biomechanical evaluation of S2 alar-iliac screws: effect of length and quad-cortical purchase as compared with iliac fixation.S2 骶髂螺钉的生物力学评估:与髂骨固定相比,长度和四皮质固定的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Sep 15;38(20):E1250-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829e17ff.
5
Biomechanical advantages of dual over single iliac screws in lumbo-iliac fixation construct.腰骶髂固定结构中双髂螺钉相对于单髂螺钉的生物力学优势。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Jul;19(7):1121-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1343-8. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
6
Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain.髂骨螺钉与椎间股骨环同种异体移植对腰骶部运动学及骶骨螺钉应变的生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 15;35(6):E198-205. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c142bf.
7
The effect of screw length and bone cement augmentation on the fixation strength of iliac screws: a biomechanical study.螺钉长度和骨水泥强化对髂骨螺钉固定强度的影响:一项生物力学研究。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Dec;22(8):545-50. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181929e0c.
8
Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation using Luque-Galveston and Colorado II sacropelvic fixation: advantage of using locked proximal fixation.使用Luque-Galveston法和Colorado II型骶骨盆固定法进行腰骶固定的生物力学比较:使用近端锁定固定的优势
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 15;30(12):1396-401. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166530.87923.5b.
9
Biomechanical effect of 4-rod technique on lumbosacral fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation.四棒技术对腰骶部固定的生物力学影响:一项体外人尸体研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 1;38(15):E925-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182967968.
10
Biomechanical Comparison of Spinopelvic Fixation Constructs: Iliac Screw Versus S2-Alar-Iliac Screw.脊柱骨盆固定结构的生物力学比较:髂骨螺钉与S2-翼-髂骨螺钉
Spine Deform. 2016 Jan;4(1):10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.07.008. Epub 2015 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative biomechanical evaluation of the U-shaped lumbopelvic stabilization technique in treating unstable sacral fractures.U形腰骶部稳定技术治疗不稳定骶骨骨折的比较生物力学评估
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jul 12;145(1):372. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05988-5.
2
Accuracy of posterosuperior iliac spine reference array placement in robot-navigated spine surgery.机器人导航脊柱手术中后上棘参考阵列放置的准确性。
Bone Jt Open. 2025 May 2;6(5):528-534. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.65.BJO-2025-0006.R1.
3
CT-based Anatomic and Clinical Analysis of Iliac Screw Placement During Spinopelvic Fixation.
脊柱骨盆固定术中基于CT的髂骨螺钉置入的解剖学与临床分析
In Vivo. 2025 May-Jun;39(3):1514-1523. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13951.
4
Anatomical Study of Lateral Compression II Screw Path and Entry Parameters Based on Three-Dimensional CT Image Reconstruction Techniques.基于三维CT图像重建技术的外侧压缩型Ⅱ型骨折螺钉置入路径及进钉参数的解剖学研究
Orthop Surg. 2025 May;17(5):1454-1463. doi: 10.1111/os.70011. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
5
Partial Sacrectomy With Lumbopelvic Fixation for Sacral Giant Cell Tumor: Emphasizing Optimal Neuro-Oncological Outcomes.腰骶部固定术辅助下的部分骶骨切除术治疗骶骨巨细胞瘤:强调最佳神经肿瘤学结局
Cureus. 2024 Oct 16;16(10):e71602. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71602. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Sacral and Lumbopelvic Fixation Techniques.骨盆环骨折:骶骨与腰骶部固定技术的生物力学比较
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Apr 2;11(4):348. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11040348.
7
Incidence and Risk Factors of the Caudal Screw Loosening after Pelvic Fixation for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.成人脊柱畸形骨盆固定术后尾端螺钉松动的发生率及危险因素:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Asian Spine J. 2024 Feb;18(1):137-145. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0421. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
8
Anatomic trajectory for iliac screw placement adapts better to the morphological features of the pelvis of each individual than the S2 alar iliac screw: a radiological study.解剖学轨迹更能适应每个个体骨盆的形态特征,而不是 S2 髂翼螺钉:一项影像学研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Sep;165(9):2607-2614. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05692-6. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
9
Biomechanical tests and finite element analyses of pelvic stability using bilateral single iliac screws with different channels in lumbo-iliac fixation.使用双侧单髂骨螺钉在腰髂固定中不同通道进行骨盆稳定性的生物力学测试和有限元分析。
Front Surg. 2022 Nov 8;9:1035614. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1035614. eCollection 2022.
10
Annular Defects Impair the Mechanical Stability of the Intervertebral Disc.环状缺陷会损害椎间盘的机械稳定性。
Global Spine J. 2023 Apr;13(3):724-729. doi: 10.1177/21925682211006061. Epub 2021 Mar 30.