Suppr超能文献

髂骨螺钉与椎间股骨环同种异体移植对腰骶部运动学及骶骨螺钉应变的生物力学比较

Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain.

作者信息

Cunningham Bryan W, Sefter John C, Hu Nianbin, Kim Seok Woo, Bridwell Keith H, McAfee Paul C

机构信息

From the *Orthopaedic Spinal Research Laboratory and Scoliosis and Spine Center, St. Joseph Medical Center, Towson, MD; and †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, WA University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 15;35(6):E198-205. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c142bf.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

This study evaluates the effect of iliac screw fixation versus interbody femoral ring allograft (FRA) on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain in long segment instrumentations.

OBJECTIVE

(1) Quantify kinematic properties of 3 lumbosacral fixation techniques; (2) Evaluate sacral screw strain as instrumented levels extend cephalad; and (3) Determine whether iliac screws or FRA biomechanically protect sacral screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

High failure rates at the lumbosacral junction have been reported with long posterior instrumentation ending with S1 pedicle screws. Achieving lumbosacral arthrodesis remains a clinical challenge.

METHODS

Seven human cadavaric lumbosacral spines were biomechanically evaluated intact and in 3 instrumented conditions: pedicle screw fixation alone (pedicle screw group), pedicle screw fixation supplemented with iliac screws (iliac screw group), and pedicle screw fixation supplemented with FRA (allograft group). Each condition was tested spanning L5-S1, L4-S1, L3-S1, L2-S1, and L1-S1. Testing included pure unconstrained moments (±10 Nm) in axial rotation, flexion/extension, and lateral bending, with quantification of S1 screw strain and lumbosacral range of motion (ROM).

RESULTS

Testing revealed decreasing lumbosacral ROM as instrumentation extended cephalad (P < 0.05). In axial rotation, ROM was markedly higher for the allograft group compared to pedicle screw and iliac screw groups with instrumentation to L4 (P < 0.05). In flexion/extension, length of instrumentation in each group correlated with ROM. As length of instrumentation increased, ROM decreased, particularly for the iliac screw group. In lateral bending, ROM decreased in all groups as instrumentation lengthened (P < 0.05). Strain on unprotected sacral screws increased in flexion, extension, and lateral bending as instrumentation extended to L3 (P < 0.05). Iliac screws reduced strain in constructs to L3 and above (P < 0.05). Allograft reduced strain when fixation reached L2, but was not as effective as iliac screws overall. Neither iliac screws nor allograft reduced strain in constructs terminating at L5 or L4. (P > 0.05) CONCLUSION.: For instrumented fusions extending above L3, sacral screws should be protected with supplemental iliac screws or FRA at L5-S1. Of the two, iliac screws appear more effective.

摘要

研究设计

本研究评估在长节段器械固定中,髂骨螺钉固定与椎间股骨环同种异体移植(FRA)对腰骶部运动学及骶骨螺钉应变的影响。

目的

(1)量化三种腰骶部固定技术的运动学特性;(2)评估随着固定节段向头侧延伸,骶骨螺钉的应变情况;(3)确定髂骨螺钉或FRA在生物力学上是否能保护骶骨螺钉。

背景资料总结

据报道,以S1椎弓根螺钉结束的长节段后路器械固定在腰骶部交界处的失败率较高。实现腰骶部融合仍是一项临床挑战。

方法

对七具人类尸体腰骶椎脊柱进行生物力学评估,评估其完整状态及三种器械固定状态:单纯椎弓根螺钉固定(椎弓根螺钉组)、补充髂骨螺钉的椎弓根螺钉固定(髂骨螺钉组)以及补充FRA的椎弓根螺钉固定(同种异体移植组)。每种状态均测试L5-S1、L4-S1、L3-S1、L2-S1和L1-S1节段。测试包括在轴向旋转、屈伸和侧方弯曲时的纯无约束力矩(±10 Nm),同时量化S1螺钉应变及腰骶部活动范围(ROM)。

结果

测试显示,随着固定节段向头侧延伸,腰骶部ROM减小(P < 0.05)。在轴向旋转时,与器械固定至L4的椎弓根螺钉组和髂骨螺钉组相比,同种异体移植组的ROM明显更高(P < 0.05)。在屈伸时,每组的固定节段长度与ROM相关。随着固定节段长度增加,ROM减小,尤其是髂骨螺钉组。在侧方弯曲时,随着器械固定长度增加,所有组的ROM均减小(P < 0.05)。当器械固定延伸至L3时,未受保护的骶骨螺钉在屈伸和侧方弯曲时的应变增加(P < 0.05)。髂骨螺钉可降低固定至L3及以上节段结构中的应变(P < 0.05)。当固定至L2时,同种异体移植可降低应变,但总体上不如髂骨螺钉有效。在固定终止于L5或L4的结构中,髂骨螺钉和同种异体移植均未降低应变(P > 0.05)。结论:对于固定节段延伸至L3以上的器械融合,在L5-S1节段应用补充性髂骨螺钉或FRA来保护骶骨螺钉。两者相比,髂骨螺钉似乎更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验