Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Dec;38(4):206-13. doi: 10.4143/crt.2006.38.4.206. Epub 2006 Dec 31.
To evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, particularly in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated 2(nd)-line or greater metastatic breast cancer, and to compare gemcitabine monotherapy (G) with two gemcitabine-based doublets, gemcitabine/vinorelbine (GV) and gemcitabine/capecitabine (GX).
Of 124 consecutive patients who progressed after anthracycline- and taxane-containing chemotherapy, 58 received G alone, 38 received GV, and 28 received GX; their outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.
The median number of prior metastatic chemotherapy regimens was 2 (range 0 approximately 4). Visceral metastases were observed in 65 patients (51.4%). The overall response rate was 19.3% (21 partial responses). After a median follow-up period of 21.4 months, the overall survival was 7.6 months (95% CI: 5.5 approximately 9.6 months) and the median time to progression was 3.1 months (95% CI: 2.0 approximately 4.2 months). Compared with monotherapy (G), combination therapy with vinorelbine or capecitabine (GV/GX) was associated with a significantly higher response rate (8.2% vs. 28.3%, p=0.008) and a significantly longer median time to progression (2.8 vs. 3.5 months; p=0.028), but overall survival did not differ between the groups (7.4 vs. 8.2 months, respectively; p=0.54). Most of the adverse treatment-related events were mild to moderate in intensity. The most common adverse event was hematologic toxicity. Multivariate analysis showed that poor performance status and a short disease-free interval were independent prognostic factors for impaired overall survival.
The combination of gemcitabine with vinorelbine or capecitabine was an active and well-tolerated treatment option for taxane- and anthracycline-pretreated 2(nd)-line or greater metastatic breast cancer patients, and gemcitabine-based doublets were more beneficial than gemcitabine monotherapy in alleviating symptoms for these patients.
评估吉西他滨为基础的化疗的疗效,特别是在接受蒽环类和紫杉烷预处理的二线或以上转移性乳腺癌患者中,并比较吉西他滨单药治疗(G)与两种吉西他滨为基础的双药联合方案,吉西他滨/长春瑞滨(GV)和吉西他滨/卡培他滨(GX)。
124 例连续接受蒽环类和紫杉烷类化疗后进展的转移性乳腺癌患者中,58 例接受吉西他滨单药治疗(G),38 例接受 GV,28 例接受 GX;回顾性分析其疗效。
中位既往转移性化疗方案数为 2 个(范围 0-4 个)。65 例(51.4%)患者存在内脏转移。总缓解率为 19.3%(21 例部分缓解)。中位随访时间 21.4 个月后,总生存期为 7.6 个月(95%CI:5.5-9.6 个月),中位无进展生存期为 3.1 个月(95%CI:2.0-4.2 个月)。与单药治疗(G)相比,联合长春瑞滨或卡培他滨(GV/GX)治疗的患者缓解率显著更高(8.2%比 28.3%,p=0.008),中位无进展生存期显著更长(2.8 比 3.5 个月;p=0.028),但两组的总生存期无差异(分别为 7.4 比 8.2 个月,p=0.54)。大多数治疗相关不良事件的严重程度为轻度至中度。最常见的不良事件是血液学毒性。多因素分析显示,较差的体能状态和较短的无疾病间期是总生存预后不良的独立预测因素。
吉西他滨联合长春瑞滨或卡培他滨是蒽环类和紫杉烷预处理的二线或以上转移性乳腺癌患者的一种有效且耐受良好的治疗选择,与吉西他滨单药治疗相比,吉西他滨为基础的双药联合方案在缓解这些患者的症状方面更具优势。