• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于器官选择性的个体化化疗:长春瑞滨与卡培他滨治疗转移性乳腺癌患者的回顾性研究

Individualized chemotherapy based on organ selectivity: a retrospective study of vinorelbine and capecitabine for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

作者信息

Liu Xiao-Hui, Man Ya-Nan, Cao Rui, Liu Chang, Wu Xiong-Zhi

机构信息

Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy , Tianjin , China.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jun;30(6):1017-24. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.895310. Epub 2014 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1185/03007995.2014.895310
PMID:24528110
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study proposed a conception of individualized chemotherapy based on organ selectivity of drug distribution by retrospectively comparing the effect of vinorelbine and capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Between January 2002 and December 2009, 133 patients with lung metastasis and 87 patients with liver metastasis were analyzed and followed up until December 2012. The survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median time to progression of the vinorelbine, capecitabine and anthracycline/taxane groups of patients with lung metastasis was 5.7, 2.9 and 2.1 months, respectively. Median overall survival of the vinorelbine group (27.4 months) was longer than the capecitabine (12.2 months, P = 0.027) and anthracycline/taxane groups (9.1 months, P < 0.001) in patients with lung metastasis. The median time to progression of the vinorelbine, capecitabine and anthracycline/taxane groups of patients with liver metastasis was 2.3, 7.3 and 2.6 months, respectively. Median overall survival of the capecitabine group (15.2 months) was longer than the vinorelbine (9.0 months, P = 0.029) and anthracycline/taxane groups (6.4 months, P = 0.004) in patients with liver metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that vinorelbine and capecitabine have different advantageous effects in breast cancer patients with lung/liver metastasis. Thus, we propose individualized chemotherapy based on organ specificity and pharmacokinetics.

摘要

目的

本研究通过回顾性比较长春瑞滨与卡培他滨对转移性乳腺癌患者的疗效,提出基于药物分布器官选择性的个体化化疗概念。

方法

分析2002年1月至2009年12月期间133例肺转移患者和87例肝转移患者,并随访至2012年12月。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析。进行多因素分析以确定独立的预后因素。

结果

肺转移患者中,长春瑞滨组、卡培他滨组和蒽环类/紫杉类组的中位疾病进展时间分别为5.7个月、2.9个月和2.1个月。肺转移患者中,长春瑞滨组的中位总生存期(27.4个月)长于卡培他滨组(12.2个月,P = 0.027)和蒽环类/紫杉类组(9.1个月,P < 0.001)。肝转移患者中,长春瑞滨组、卡培他滨组和蒽环类/紫杉类组的中位疾病进展时间分别为2.3个月、7.3个月和2.6个月。肝转移患者中,卡培他滨组的中位总生存期(15.2个月)长于长春瑞滨组(9.0个月,P = 0.029)和蒽环类/紫杉类组(6.4个月,P = 0.004)。

结论

我们的结果表明,长春瑞滨和卡培他滨在肺/肝转移的乳腺癌患者中具有不同的优势作用。因此,我们提出基于器官特异性和药代动力学的个体化化疗。

相似文献

1
Individualized chemotherapy based on organ selectivity: a retrospective study of vinorelbine and capecitabine for patients with metastatic breast cancer.基于器官选择性的个体化化疗:长春瑞滨与卡培他滨治疗转移性乳腺癌患者的回顾性研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jun;30(6):1017-24. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.895310. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
2
Survival differences observed in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with capecitabine when compared with vinorelbine after pretreatment with anthracycline and taxane.在蒽环类药物和紫杉烷预处理后,接受卡培他滨治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者与接受长春瑞滨治疗的患者相比,观察到生存差异。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun;30(3):297-302. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000258125.97090.3f.
3
Sequential therapy with capecitabine followed by vinorelbine/cisplatin in patients with anthracycline/taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer.对于蒽环类/紫杉烷难治性转移性乳腺癌患者,采用卡培他滨序贯长春瑞滨/顺铂治疗。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2006 Jul;69(7):304-9. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70263-1.
4
Final results of an international retrospective observational study in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with oral vinorelbine-based chemotherapy.晚期乳腺癌患者接受口服长春瑞滨为基础化疗的国际回顾性观察性研究的最终结果。
Anticancer Res. 2012 Oct;32(10):4539-45.
5
A multicenter randomized phase III trial of vinorelbine/gemcitabine doublet versus capecitabine monotherapy in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated women with metastatic breast cancer.多中心随机 III 期试验:长春瑞滨/吉西他滨双联方案对比卡培他滨单药治疗蒽环类和紫杉类药物预处理的转移性乳腺癌女性患者。
Ann Oncol. 2012 May;23(5):1164-1169. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr405. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
6
Efficacy of S-1 in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer: cross-resistance to capecitabine.S-1对转移性乳腺癌多程治疗患者的疗效:对卡培他滨的交叉耐药性。
Breast Cancer. 2009;16(2):126-31. doi: 10.1007/s12282-008-0073-9. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
7
Anti-tumor activity of capecitabine and vinorelbine in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: findings from the EORTC 10001 randomized phase II trial.卡培他滨和长春瑞滨在接受过蒽环类和紫杉烷类治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者中的抗肿瘤活性:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)10001随机II期试验结果
Breast. 2008 Apr;17(2):180-5. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
8
Capecitabine and vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline and taxane.卡培他滨和长春瑞滨用于既往接受过蒽环类药物和紫杉烷治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者。
J Korean Med Sci. 2004 Aug;19(4):547-53. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.4.547.
9
Vinorelbine and capecitabine in anthracycline- and/or taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: sequential or combinational?多柔比星和/或紫杉烷预处理的转移性乳腺癌中长春瑞滨和卡培他滨:序贯还是联合?
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Jan;71(1):103-13. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-1983-y. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
10
Phase II study of oral vinorelbine in combination with capecitabine as second line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes.一项评估口服长春瑞滨联合卡培他滨作为蒽环类和紫杉类药物治疗失败的转移性乳腺癌二线治疗的Ⅱ期临床研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010 Mar;65(4):755-63. doi: 10.1007/s00280-009-1081-y. Epub 2009 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A Portal Vein Injection Model to Study Liver Metastasis of Breast Cancer.一种用于研究乳腺癌肝转移的门静脉注射模型。
J Vis Exp. 2016 Dec 26(118):54903. doi: 10.3791/54903.