Maeder M T, Zellweger M J
Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute/Heart Center, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australien.
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2009 Sep 23;98(19):1083-90. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157.98.19.1083.
Invasive coronary angiography and computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography directly visualise coronary anatomy but do not provide information about the presence of inducible myocardial ischaemia. Due to its excellent negative predictive value CT coronary angiography is a suitable test to exclude significant coronary artery disease. However, given its high rate of false positive results particularly in the presence of significant coronary calcification CT coronary angiography only rarely is a real alternative to invasive coronary angiography in clinical practice. The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is a surrogate for the extent of coronary atherosclerosis and a possible marker of biological age but does not provide any anatomical or pathophysiological information. In asymptomatic patients a CACS of zero is associated with a very low likelihood of a significant coronary stenosis and a good prognosis. However, this is not the case in symptomatic patients, and thus, CACS does not play a significant role in the diagnostic work-up in symptomatic patients in daily routine.
有创冠状动脉造影和计算机断层扫描(CT)冠状动脉造影可直接观察冠状动脉解剖结构,但无法提供关于是否存在可诱导性心肌缺血的信息。由于其出色的阴性预测价值,CT冠状动脉造影是排除严重冠状动脉疾病的合适检查方法。然而,鉴于其假阳性结果发生率较高,尤其是在存在严重冠状动脉钙化的情况下,在临床实践中,CT冠状动脉造影很少能真正替代有创冠状动脉造影。冠状动脉钙化积分(CACS)是冠状动脉粥样硬化程度的替代指标,也是生物学年龄的一个可能标志物,但不提供任何解剖学或病理生理学信息。在无症状患者中,CACS为零与严重冠状动脉狭窄的可能性极低及预后良好相关。然而,有症状患者并非如此,因此,在日常临床中,CACS在有症状患者的诊断检查中并不起重要作用。