Suppr超能文献

64排冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术对无已知冠状动脉疾病个体冠状动脉狭窄评估的诊断性能:前瞻性多中心ACCURACY(冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术对接受有创冠状动脉造影术个体的评估)试验结果

Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial.

作者信息

Budoff Matthew J, Dowe David, Jollis James G, Gitter Michael, Sutherland John, Halamert Edward, Scherer Markus, Bellinger Raye, Martin Arthur, Benton Robert, Delago Augustin, Min James K

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, California, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 18;52(21):1724-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiographically gated 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in individuals without known coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUND

CCTA is a promising method for detection and exclusion of obstructive coronary artery stenosis. To date, no prospective multicenter trial has evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 64-multidetector row CCTA in populations with intermediate prevalence of CAD.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated subjects with chest pain at 16 sites who were clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA). CCTAs were scored by consensus of 3 independent blinded readers. The ICAs were evaluated for coronary stenosis based on quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). No subjects were excluded for baseline coronary artery calcium score or body mass index.

RESULTS

A total of 230 subjects underwent both CCTA and ICA (59.1% male; mean age: 57 +/- 10 years). On a patient-based model, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values to detect > or =50% or > or =70% stenosis were 95%, 83%, 64%, and 99%, respectively, and 94%, 83%, 48%, 99%, respectively. No differences in sensitivity and specificity were noted for nonobese compared with obese subjects or for heart rates < or =65 beats/min compared with >65 beats/min, whereas calcium scores >400 reduced specificity significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective multicenter trial of chest pain patients without known CAD, 64-multidetector row CCTA possesses high diagnostic accuracy for detection of obstructive coronary stenosis at both thresholds of 50% and 70% stenosis. Importantly, the 99% negative predictive value at the patient and vessel level establishes CCTA as an effective noninvasive alternative to ICA to rule out obstructive coronary artery stenosis. (A Study of Computed Tomography [CT] for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Blockages in Typical or Atypical Chest Pain; NCT00348569).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估心电图门控64排冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)对无已知冠状动脉疾病(CAD)个体的诊断准确性。

背景

CCTA是检测和排除阻塞性冠状动脉狭窄的一种有前景的方法。迄今为止,尚无前瞻性多中心试验评估64排CCTA在CAD中等患病率人群中的诊断准确性。

方法

我们前瞻性地评估了16个地点因胸痛而临床转诊进行有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)的受试者。CCTA由3名独立的盲法阅片者共同评分。基于定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)对ICA进行冠状动脉狭窄评估。没有受试者因基线冠状动脉钙化评分或体重指数而被排除。

结果

共有230名受试者接受了CCTA和ICA检查(男性占59.1%;平均年龄:57±10岁)。在基于患者的模型中,检测≥50%或≥70%狭窄的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为95%、83%、64%和99%,以及94%、83%、48%和99%。非肥胖受试者与肥胖受试者相比,或心率≤65次/分钟与>65次/分钟相比,在敏感性和特异性方面未发现差异,而钙化评分>400会显著降低特异性。

结论

在这项针对无已知CAD的胸痛患者的前瞻性多中心试验中,64排CCTA在50%和70%狭窄阈值时检测阻塞性冠状动脉狭窄均具有较高的诊断准确性。重要的是,在患者和血管层面99%的阴性预测值使CCTA成为排除阻塞性冠状动脉狭窄的一种有效的非侵入性替代ICA的方法。(计算机断层扫描[CT]评估典型或非典型胸痛中冠状动脉阻塞的研究;NCT00348569)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验