Suppr超能文献

一项评价知识转化和交流策略影响的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies.

机构信息

School of Nursing, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2009 Sep 23;4:61. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-61.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Significant resources and time are invested in the production of research knowledge. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of three knowledge translation and exchange strategies in the incorporation of research evidence into public health policies and programs.

METHODS

This trial was conducted with a national sample of public health departments in Canada from 2004 to 2006. The three interventions, implemented over one year in 2005, included access to an online registry of research evidence; tailored messaging; and a knowledge broker. The primary outcome assessed the extent to which research evidence was used in a recent program decision, and the secondary outcome measured the change in the sum of evidence-informed healthy body weight promotion policies or programs being delivered at health departments. Mixed-effects models were used to test the hypotheses.

FINDINGS

One hundred and eight of 141 (77%) health departments participated in this study. No significant effect of the intervention was observed for primary outcome (p < 0.45). However, for public health policies and programs (HPPs), a significant effect of the intervention was observed only for tailored, targeted messages (p < 0.01). The treatment effect was moderated by organizational research culture (e.g., value placed on research evidence in decision making).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that under certain conditions tailored, targeted messages are more effective than knowledge brokering and access to an online registry of research evidence. Greater emphasis on the identification of organizational factors is needed in order to implement strategies that best meet the needs of individual organizations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial registration number and title are as follows: ISRCTN35240937 -- Is a knowledge broker more effective than other strategies in promoting evidence-based physical activity and healthy body weight programming?

摘要

背景

大量的资源和时间都投入到了研究知识的产生中。本随机对照试验的主要目的是评估三种知识转化和交流策略在将研究证据纳入公共卫生政策和计划中的有效性。

方法

本试验于 2004 年至 2006 年在加拿大全国范围内的公共卫生部门进行。三种干预措施在 2005 年实施了一年,包括提供研究证据在线注册、量身定制的信息传递和知识经纪人。主要结局评估研究证据在最近的一个项目决策中的应用程度,次要结局衡量健康体重促进政策或计划在卫生部门实施的证据数量的变化。采用混合效应模型检验假设。

结果

141 个卫生部门中有 108 个(77%)参与了这项研究。干预对主要结局没有显著影响(p < 0.45)。然而,对于公共卫生政策和计划(HPPs),干预仅对量身定制的、有针对性的信息传递有显著影响(p < 0.01)。治疗效果受到组织研究文化的调节(例如,在决策中对研究证据的重视程度)。

结论

这项研究的结果表明,在某些条件下,量身定制的、有针对性的信息传递比知识经纪人和研究证据在线注册更有效。需要更加重视确定组织因素,以便实施最符合个别组织需求的策略。

试验注册

试验注册号和标题如下:ISRCTN35240937——知识经纪人在促进基于证据的身体活动和健康体重规划方面是否比其他策略更有效?

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ce/2936828/455630b5aa9c/1748-5908-4-61-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验