Karlsson L, Johansson E, Tranaeus S
Division of Cardiology and Endodontology, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Caries Res. 2009;43(5):397-404. doi: 10.1159/000239754. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
The aim was to assess the validity of laser fluorescence (LF), visual inspection and surface texture on root caries lesions in vitro, related to histological lesion depths. Agreement on interdevice, interexaminer and intra-examiner levels as well as the influence of discolouration and surface texture on LF readings were investigated. Calibrated examiners assessed lesion colour and surface texture and performed measurements with 2 LF devices in 3 separate series at intervals of 1 week. Sections (300 mum thick) of 64 out of 93 teeth were obtained and examined under the microscope. Lesion depth was assessed with 2 references: from the delineated borderline of the original exposed root surface (ref. I), or if loss of surface continuity, the absolute lesion depth (ref. II). The correlation (Spearman rho) between LF readings and histological depth was low with values ranging from 0.22 (p > 0.05) to 0.31 (p < 0.05). LF 1 and LF 2 were significantly correlated with discolouration (rho = 0.52 and 0.46, respectively) and with surface texture denoted as hard (rho = 0.34 and 0.33, respectively). A significant correlation between colour and histological depth ref. I (rho = 0.51) and ref. II (rho = 0.56) was found. No significant correlation between surface texture and histological depth was found. The reliability, evaluated as intraclass correlation coefficient was for intra-examiner 0.99, interexaminer 0.97 and interdevice level 0.98. Large differences were found between 2 consecutive measurements, and high measurement errors indicated considerable deviation of individual measurements. Based on these findings, the LF device is not suitable as a diagnostic tool for root caries.
目的是在体外评估激光荧光(LF)、视觉检查和表面纹理对于与组织学病变深度相关的根龋病变的有效性。研究了设备间、检查者间和检查者内水平的一致性以及变色和表面纹理对LF读数的影响。经过校准的检查者评估病变颜色和表面纹理,并使用2种LF设备在3个独立系列中每隔1周进行测量。从93颗牙齿中获取了64颗牙齿的切片(300μm厚)并在显微镜下检查。使用2个参考标准评估病变深度:从原始暴露根表面的划定边界(参考标准I),或者如果表面连续性丧失,则为绝对病变深度(参考标准II)。LF读数与组织学深度之间的相关性(Spearman秩相关系数)较低,值范围为0.22(p>0.05)至0.31(p<0.05)。LF 1和LF 2与变色(分别为rho = 0.52和0.46)以及表示为硬的表面纹理(分别为rho = 0.34和0.33)显著相关。发现颜色与组织学深度参考标准I(rho = 0.51)和参考标准II(rho = 0.56)之间存在显著相关性。未发现表面纹理与组织学深度之间存在显著相关性。以组内相关系数评估的可靠性,检查者内为0.99,检查者间为0.97,设备间水平为0.98。在连续2次测量之间发现了很大差异,并且高测量误差表明个体测量存在相当大的偏差。基于这些发现,LF设备不适合作为根龋的诊断工具。