• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物及联合干预措施在减轻儿童常规免疫接种时注射疼痛方面的有效性和耐受性:系统评价与荟萃分析

Effectiveness and tolerability of pharmacologic and combined interventions for reducing injection pain during routine childhood immunizations: systematic review and meta-analyses.

作者信息

Shah Vibhuti, Taddio Anna, Rieder Michael J

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2009;31 Suppl 2:S104-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.001
PMID:19781433
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immunization is the most common cause of iatrogenic pain in childhood. Despite the availability of various analgesics to manage vaccine injection pain, they have not been incorporated into clinical practice. To date, no systematic review has been published on the effectiveness of pharmacologic and combined interventions for reducing injection pain.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this article were to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of various pharmacologic and combined interventions for reducing the pain experienced by children during immunization.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs pertaining to pharmacologic and combined interventions to reduce injection pain in children 0 to 18 years of age using validated child self-reported pain or observer-reported assessments of child pain and distress. We included trials that (1) investigated the effects of pharmacologic interventions (ie, topical local anesthetics, sweet-tasting solutions, vapocoolants, and oral analgesics [acetaminophen or ibuprofen]); (2) compared 2 different analgesic interventions; and (3) evaluated combinations of >or= 2 analgesic interventions, including breastfeeding. Meta-analyses were performed using a fixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies, involving 3856 infants and children 2 weeks to 15 years of age, were included in this systematic review; 23 of these trials were included in meta-analyses. Ten trials, including 1156 infants and children, evaluated topical local anesthetics. In a meta-analysis of 2 trials, including 276 children, child self-reported pain ratings were lower in children who received topical local anesthetics than in those who received a placebo. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was -0.25 (95% CI, -0.49 to -0.01; P = 0.04). The use of topical local anesthetics was associated with less pain than was placebo in 4 trials (527 infants) based on the difference between Modified Behavioral Pain Scale scores (range, 0-10) before and after vaccination: the weighted mean difference (WMD) was -0.79 (95% CI, -1.10 to -0.48; P < 0.001) and the SMD was -0.43 (95% CI, -0.60 to -0.26; P = 0.001). Observer-rated pain, using visual analog scale (VAS) scores (range, 0-100 mm), was significantly lower (WMD, -16.56 mm; 95% CI, -22.11 to -11.01; P < 0.001; and SMD, -0.75; 95% CI, -1.00 to -0.49; P < 0.001). The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent 1 child from having clinically significant pain, measured using the Faces Pain Scale (FPS; score, >-3), was 3.7 (95% CI, 2.5 to 7.7) from 1 study. Eleven trials (1452 infants and children) evaluated sweet-tasting solutions. In a meta-analysis of 6 studies (665 infants), administration of sucrose with or without non-nutritive sucking (NNS; use of a pacifier) was associated with less pain than no intervention or sterile water with or without NNS; the SMD was -0.56 (95% CI, -0.72 to -0.40; P < 0.001). Total cry duration was lower in infants who received sucrose than in those who received sterile water (WMD, -9.41 sec; 95% CI, -13.18 to -5.64; P < 0.001; and SMD, -0.43; 95% CI, -0.61 to -0.25; P < 0.001). The NNT to prevent 1 child from having clinically significant pain, using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (score, >3), was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.5). In 3 trials that evaluated sweet-tasting solutions longitudinally, administration of sucrose or glucose (vs sterile water, with or without NNS) was associated with reduced pain based on cry duration or the University of Wisconsin Children's Hospital Pain Scale (all, P < 0.05). Data were pooled for 2 studies conducted in 100 children who received a spray with a vapocoolant or placebo at the injection site before the procedure. Child self-rated pain (4-point scale) was lower in the group treated with the vapo-coolant (SMD, -0.43; 95% CI, -0.83 to -0.02; P = 0.04); significant heterogeneity was reported for this outcome (chi(2) = 5.51; P = 0.02; I(2) = 82%). In 2 studies (117 children), no significant difference was found between vapocoolants and typical care (no treatment) based on child self-reports; significant heterogeneity was reported for this outcome (chi(2) = 9.89; P = 0.02; I(2) = 90%). None of the studies identified in the literature search evaluated oral analgesics (acetaminophen or ibuprofen). Four studies (318 infants and children) compared 2 different analgesic interventions; there was insufficient evidence to suggest superiority of 1 intervention over another. Combinations of >or=2 analgesic interventions were more effective than the individual interventions used alone. Child self-reported pain ratings were combined for 4 studies (350 children); the SMD was -0.52 (95% CI, -0.73 to -0.30; P = 0.001). Data on cry duration were pooled for 3 studies (229 infants and children); the WMD was -18.87 seconds (95% CI, -32.05 to -5.69; P = 0.005). Parent-rated child pain (VAS) scores were combined for 3 studies (365 infants and children); the WMD was -15.66 mm (95% CI, -19.74 to -11.57; P < 0.001). Nurse- or physician-rated child pain (VAS) scores were combined for 3 studies (368 infants and children); the WMD was -17.85 mm (95% CI, -21.43 to -14.28; P < 0.001). In a meta-analysis of 4 studies (474 infants), infants who were breastfed before, during, and after the procedure had less pain than did those who were not breastfed (SMD, -2.03; 95% CI, -2.26 to -1.80; P < 0.001). A meta-analysis of 3 studies (344 infants) found a shorter cry duration for infants who were breastfed than for those who were not breastfed (WMD, -38.00 sec; 95% CI, -42.27 to -33.73; P < 0.001; and SMD, -2.00; 95% CI, -2.27 to -1.73; P < 0.001). The NNT to prevent 1 infant from having clinically significant pain, using the Facial Pain Rating Scale (pain vs no pain), was 7.7 (95% CI, 4.5 to 25.0) from 1 study.

CONCLUSION

Topical local anesthetics, sweet-tasting solutions, and combined analgesic interventions, including breastfeeding, were associated with reduced pain during childhood immunizations and should be recommended for use in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

免疫接种是儿童医源性疼痛最常见的原因。尽管有多种镇痛药可用于处理疫苗注射疼痛,但它们尚未被纳入临床实践。迄今为止,尚未发表关于药物及联合干预措施减轻注射疼痛有效性的系统评价。

目的

本文旨在评估各种药物及联合干预措施减轻儿童免疫接种时疼痛的有效性和耐受性。

方法

检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL以及Cochrane对照试验中心注册库,以识别关于药物及联合干预措施减轻0至18岁儿童注射疼痛的随机对照试验(RCT)和半随机对照试验,采用经过验证的儿童自我报告疼痛或观察者报告的儿童疼痛与痛苦评估。我们纳入了以下试验:(1)研究药物干预措施(即局部外用麻醉剂、甜味溶液、冷感剂和口服镇痛药[对乙酰氨基酚或布洛芬])的效果;(2)比较两种不同的镇痛干预措施;(3)评估两种或两种以上镇痛干预措施的联合应用,包括母乳喂养。采用固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

本系统评价纳入了32项研究,涉及3856名2周龄至15岁的婴幼儿及儿童;其中23项试验纳入了荟萃分析。10项试验,包括1156名婴幼儿及儿童,评估了局部外用麻醉剂。在一项纳入276名儿童的2项试验的荟萃分析中,接受局部外用麻醉剂的儿童自我报告的疼痛评分低于接受安慰剂的儿童。标准化均数差(SMD)为-0.25(95%CI,-0.49至-0.01;P = 0.04)。基于疫苗接种前后改良行为疼痛量表评分(范围为0至10)的差异,4项试验(527名婴儿)中使用局部外用麻醉剂的疼痛程度低于安慰剂:加权均数差(WMD)为-0.79(95%CI,-1.10至-0.48;P < 0.001),SMD为-0.43(95%CI,-0.60至-0.26;P = 0.001)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分(范围为0至100 mm)的观察者评定疼痛显著更低(WMD,-16.56 mm;95%CI,-22.11至-11.01;P < 0.001;SMD,-0.75;95%CI,-1.00至-0.49;P < 0.001)。一项研究中,使用面部疼痛量表(FPS;评分>3)预防1名儿童出现具有临床意义疼痛所需的治疗人数(NNT)为3.7(95%CI,2.5至7.7)。11项试验(14,52名婴幼儿及儿童)评估了甜味溶液。在一项纳入6项研究(665名婴儿)的荟萃分析中,给予蔗糖(无论有无非营养性吸吮[NNS;使用安抚奶嘴])比不干预或给予无菌水(无论有无NNS)疼痛程度更低;SMD为-0.56(95%CI,-0.72至-0.40;P < 0.001)。接受蔗糖的婴儿的总哭闹持续时间低于接受无菌水的婴儿(WMD,-9.41秒;95%CI,-13.18至-5.64;P < 0.001;SMD,-0.43;95%CI,-0.61至-0.25;P < 0.001)。使用新生儿婴儿疼痛量表(评分>3)预防1名儿童出现具有临床意义疼痛所需的NNT为1.4(95%CI,1.0至2.5)。在3项纵向评估甜味溶液的试验中,给予蔗糖或葡萄糖(与无菌水相比,无论有无NNS)基于哭闹持续时间或威斯康星大学儿童医院疼痛量表显示疼痛减轻(均P < 0.05)。对在100名儿童中进行的2项研究的数据进行汇总,这些儿童在操作前在注射部位接受了冷感剂喷雾或安慰剂。接受冷感剂治疗组的儿童自我评定疼痛(4分制)更低(SMD,-0.43;95%CI,-0.83至-0.02;P = 0.04);该结果报告存在显著异质性(χ² = 5.51;P = 0.02;I² = 82%)。在2项研究(117名儿童)中,基于儿童自我报告,冷感剂与常规护理(不治疗)之间未发现显著差异;该结果报告存在显著异质性(χ² = 9.89;P = 0.02;I² = 90%)。文献检索中未发现评估口服镇痛药(对乙酰氨基酚或布洛芬)的研究。4项研究(318名婴幼儿及儿童)比较了两种不同的镇痛干预措施;没有足够的证据表明一种干预措施优于另一种。两种或两种以上镇痛干预措施的联合应用比单独使用个体干预措施更有效。4项研究(350名儿童)的儿童自我报告疼痛评分进行了汇总;SMD为-0.52(95%CI,-0.73至-0.30;P = 0.001)。3项研究(229名婴幼儿及儿童)的哭闹持续时间数据进行了汇总;WMD为-18.87秒(95%CI,-32.05至-5.69;P = 0.005)。3项研究(365名婴幼儿及儿童)的家长评定儿童疼痛(VAS)评分进行了汇总;WMD为-15.66 mm(95%CI,-19.74至-11.57;P < 0.001)。3项研究(368名婴幼儿及儿童)的护士或医生评定儿童疼痛(VAS)评分进行了汇总;WMD为-17.85 mm(95%CI,-21.43至-14.28;P < 0.001)。在一项纳入4项研究(474名婴儿)的荟萃分析中,表示操作前、操作期间及操作后进行母乳喂养的婴儿比未进行母乳喂养的婴儿疼痛程度更低(SMD,-2.03;95%CI,-2.26至-1.80;P < 0.001)。一项纳入3项研究(344名婴儿)的荟萃分析发现,母乳喂养的婴儿哭闹持续时间比未母乳喂养的婴儿更短(WMD,-38.00秒;95%CI,-42.27至-33.73;P < 0.001;SMD,-2.00;95%CI,-2.27至-1.73;P < 0.001)。一项研究中,使用面部疼痛评定量表(疼痛与无疼痛)预防1名婴儿出现具有临床意义疼痛所需的NNT为7.7(95%CI,4.5至25.0)。

结论

局部外用麻醉剂、甜味溶液以及包括母乳喂养在内的联合镇痛干预措施与减轻儿童免疫接种时的疼痛相关,应推荐在临床实践中使用。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and tolerability of pharmacologic and combined interventions for reducing injection pain during routine childhood immunizations: systematic review and meta-analyses.药物及联合干预措施在减轻儿童常规免疫接种时注射疼痛方面的有效性和耐受性:系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Ther. 2009;31 Suppl 2:S104-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.001.
2
Physical interventions and injection techniques for reducing injection pain during routine childhood immunizations: systematic review of randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials.用于减轻儿童常规免疫接种期间注射疼痛的物理干预措施和注射技术:随机对照试验和半随机对照试验的系统评价
Clin Ther. 2009;31 Suppl 2:S48-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.024.
3
Psychological interventions for reducing pain and distress during routine childhood immunizations: a systematic review.用于减轻儿童常规免疫接种期间疼痛和痛苦的心理干预措施:一项系统综述
Clin Ther. 2009;31 Suppl 2:S77-S103. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.023.
4
Pharmacological interventions for pain relief during orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗期间缓解疼痛的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 28;11(11):CD003976. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003976.pub2.
5
Skin-to-skin care for procedural pain in neonates.新生儿程序性疼痛的肌肤接触护理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 16;2(2):CD008435. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008435.pub3.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
8
Atypical antipsychotics for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths.用于治疗儿童和青少年破坏性行为障碍的非典型抗精神病药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 9;8(8):CD008559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008559.pub3.
9
Dietary interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood.儿童复发性腹痛的饮食干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 23;3(3):CD010972. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010972.pub2.
10
Symptomatic treatment of migraine in children: a systematic review of medication trials.儿童偏头痛的对症治疗:药物试验的系统评价
Pediatrics. 2005 Aug;116(2):e295-302. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2742.

引用本文的文献

1
Local analgesia for the relief of pain in children undergoing venipuncture and intravenous cannulation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.局部镇痛用于缓解儿童静脉穿刺和静脉置管时的疼痛:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02991-6.
2
Cold and vibration for children undergoing needle-related procedures: A non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.针对接受与针头相关操作的儿童的冷刺激与振动:一项非劣效性随机临床试验。
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2024 Jun 22;6(4):164-173. doi: 10.1002/pne2.12125. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
A Comparison of the Effects of Acupressure and Music on Venipuncture Pain Intensity in Children: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
穴位按压与音乐对儿童静脉穿刺疼痛强度影响的比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
Pain Res Manag. 2024 Jan 18;2024:2504732. doi: 10.1155/2024/2504732. eCollection 2024.
4
The certified child life specialist: A novel resource in the pediatric primary care clinic for managing children's pain during routine immunizations.认证儿童生活专家:儿科初级保健诊所中管理儿童常规免疫接种期间疼痛的一种新型资源。
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2023 Mar 1;5(3):66-75. doi: 10.1002/pne2.12101. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Effect of coolant spray on rib fracture pain of geriatric blunt thoracic trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial.冷却剂喷雾对老年钝性胸部创伤患者肋骨骨折疼痛的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Feb 17;69(1):30-36. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220048. eCollection 2023.
6
Efficacy and safety of vapocoolant spray for vascular puncture in children and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.血管穿刺用喷雾式冷却剂在儿童和成人中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 13;18(2):e0279463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279463. eCollection 2023.
7
Comparison of the Effect of EMLA™ Cream and the Valsalva Maneuver on Pain Severity during Vascular Needle Insertion in Hemodialysis Patients: A Controlled, Randomized, Clinical Trial.EMLA™乳膏与瓦尔萨尔瓦动作对血液透析患者血管穿刺时疼痛严重程度影响的比较:一项对照、随机临床试验
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Aug 31;2022:8383021. doi: 10.1155/2022/8383021. eCollection 2022.
8
Effect of external cold and thermomechanical stimulation on anxiety and pain during intravenous cannulation among children.外部寒冷和热机械刺激对儿童静脉置管期间焦虑和疼痛的影响。
Sudan J Paediatr. 2021;21(2):162-172. doi: 10.24911/SJP.106-1590387019.
9
Vaccines Attitudes, Concerns, and Information Sources Reported by Parents of Young Children among North Palestinian Parents.巴勒斯坦北部地区幼儿家长报告的疫苗态度、担忧及信息来源
Adv Prev Med. 2020 Oct 31;2020:8028172. doi: 10.1155/2020/8028172. eCollection 2020.
10
Implementation Effectiveness of a Parent-Directed YouTube Video ("It Doesn't Have To Hurt") on Evidence-Based Strategies to Manage Needle Pain: Descriptive Survey Study.家长指导的YouTube视频(“不必疼痛”)对基于证据的管理针头疼痛策略的实施效果:描述性调查研究。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2020 Mar 4;3(1):e13552. doi: 10.2196/13552.