Viau Emily, Peccia Jordan
Department of Chemical Engineering, Environmental Engineering Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Water Res. 2009 Nov;43(19):4878-87. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.016. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
The utility of the enterococci indicator for measuring biosolids quality was evaluated in biosolids from 22 U.S. wastewater treatment facilities. Enterococci were enumerated using 23S rRNA quantitative PCR (qPCR) and membrane filtration with mEI-agar culture analyses in biosolids collected after mesophilic anaerobic digestion (MAD, class B, 13 treatment plants), composting (class A, 10 treatment plants), and temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD, class A, six treatment plants). Enterococci qPCR and culture values were not significantly different for a given treatment (P>0.05, paired t-test) and both assays showed differences in biosolid treatment effectiveness-anaerobic digestion treatments averaged 5-5.5log genomic units (GU) and colony forming units (CFU)/dry g while composting decreased enterococci on average to 3.7logGU and 3.8logCFU/dry g. Only in class A TPAD biosolids dewatered with a belt-filter press were culture values significantly lower than qPCR values (1.7logCFU/dryg vs. 5GU/dryg). Further investigation of compost inactivation was compared for enterococci and other fecal indicators (n=5 treatment plants)-the enterococci indicator was more resistant to compost treatment than fecal coliforms, with reductions averaging only 1-2.5 logs for enterococci, male-specific coliphages, and sulfite-reducing Clostridia while 5-log reductions were observed for fecal coliforms. Lastly, biosolid isolates from culture-based methods were identified using DNA sequencing-these results revealed that non-enterococci, including Bacillus spp. and Vagococcus spp., were commonly isolated from compost and TPAD biosolids using mEI agar. Given the equivalency of culture- and qPCR-based enterococci concentrations in biosolids and the more conservative inactivation noted for both assays during class A composting, the use of enterococci qPCR monitoring could bypass non-specificity issues with culture-based methods while providing an improved description of pathogen fate in biosolids.
在美国22家污水处理设施的生物固体中,对肠球菌指标用于衡量生物固体质量的效用进行了评估。在中温厌氧消化(MAD,B级,13个处理厂)、堆肥(A级,10个处理厂)和温度分段厌氧消化(TPAD,A级,6个处理厂)后收集的生物固体中,使用23S rRNA定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)和mEI琼脂培养分析的膜过滤法对肠球菌进行计数。对于给定的处理,肠球菌qPCR和培养值没有显著差异(P>0.05,配对t检验),两种检测方法均显示出生物固体处理效果的差异——厌氧消化处理平均为5-5.5对数基因组单位(GU)和菌落形成单位(CFU)/干克,而堆肥平均将肠球菌减少至3.7logGU和3.8logCFU/干克。仅在使用带式压滤机脱水的A级TPAD生物固体中,培养值显著低于qPCR值(1.7logCFU/干克对5GU/干克)。对肠球菌和其他粪便指标(n=5个处理厂)的堆肥灭活进行了进一步研究比较——肠球菌指标比粪大肠菌群对堆肥处理更具抗性,肠球菌、雄性特异性噬菌体和亚硫酸盐还原梭菌的减少量平均仅为1-2.5对数,而粪大肠菌群的减少量为5对数。最后,使用DNA测序对基于培养方法的生物固体分离株进行了鉴定——这些结果表明,使用mEI琼脂从堆肥和TPAD生物固体中常见地分离出非肠球菌,包括芽孢杆菌属和漫游球菌属。鉴于生物固体中基于培养和qPCR的肠球菌浓度相当,且在A级堆肥过程中两种检测方法均显示出更保守的灭活情况,使用肠球菌qPCR监测可以绕过基于培养方法的非特异性问题,同时更好地描述生物固体中病原体的归宿。