• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇科肿瘤手术中患者自控硬膜外镇痛与静脉镇痛的围手术期结局比较

Perioperative outcomes comparing patient controlled epidural versus intravenous analgesia in gynecologic oncology surgery.

作者信息

Chen Lee-May, Weinberg Vivian K, Chen Christine, Powell C Bethan, Chen Lee-Lynn, Chan John K, Burkhardt Daniel H

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Dec;115(3):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.08.015. Epub 2009 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.08.015
PMID:19783285
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to compare perioperative patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) versus patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA) after gynecologic oncology laparotomy.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study where perioperative pain management was decided through patient-centered discussion by anesthesia and surgical teams. The study was designed to accrue 224 patients, to test for equivalence in pain control on postoperative day 1, defined as less than a 10% difference in the proportion of patients with a visual analog scale pain score of <2 (0-10 scale).

RESULTS

Two hundred forty patients were enrolled, with 205 patients evaluable for outcomes: 98 received PCA, while 107 received a thoracic level PCEA. Utilization of PCEA was associated with longer anesthesia time pre-op (means: 60 vs. 44 min, p<0.0001), as well as more likely use of pressors during surgery (78% vs. 57%, p=0.002). Pain control was comparable between groups on postoperative day 1 (mean VAS: 2.4 vs. 2.5, p=0.56), but patients with PCEA tended to require more supplemental pain medications. Time to first ambulation was longer in the PCEA patients (means: 49 vs. 36 h post-op, p=0.03), with no difference in time to tolerating regular diet (means: 89 vs. 77 h post-op, 0.17) and no difference in readiness for discharge (means: 144 vs. 145 h post-op, p=0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nonrandomized prospective study, selection of a PCEA for perioperative pain management did not improve pain management for patients undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是比较妇科肿瘤剖腹手术后围手术期患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)与患者自控静脉镇痛(PCA)的效果。

方法

这是一项前瞻性队列研究,围手术期疼痛管理通过麻醉和手术团队以患者为中心的讨论来决定。该研究旨在招募224名患者,以测试术后第1天疼痛控制的等效性,定义为视觉模拟量表疼痛评分<2(0-10分)的患者比例差异小于10%。

结果

共纳入240名患者,其中205名患者可评估结局:98名接受PCA,107名接受胸段PCEA。使用PCEA与术前麻醉时间较长有关(平均值:60分钟对44分钟,p<0.0001),以及手术期间更有可能使用升压药(78%对57%,p=0.002)。两组术后第1天的疼痛控制相当(平均VAS:2.4对2.5,p=0.56),但PCEA患者往往需要更多的补充性镇痛药。PCEA患者首次下床活动的时间更长(平均值:术后49小时对36小时,p=0.03),耐受常规饮食的时间没有差异(平均值:术后89小时对77小时,p=0.17),出院准备情况也没有差异(平均值:术后144小时对145小时,p=0.95)。

结论

在这项非随机前瞻性研究中,选择PCEA进行围手术期疼痛管理并不能改善妇科肿瘤手术患者的疼痛管理。

相似文献

1
Perioperative outcomes comparing patient controlled epidural versus intravenous analgesia in gynecologic oncology surgery.妇科肿瘤手术中患者自控硬膜外镇痛与静脉镇痛的围手术期结局比较
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Dec;115(3):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.08.015. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
2
A prospective randomized trial comparing patient-controlled epidural analgesia to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain control and recovery after major open gynecologic cancer surgery.一项前瞻性随机试验,比较患者自控硬膜外镇痛与患者自控静脉镇痛对大型开放性妇科癌症手术后疼痛控制和恢复的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jul;114(1):111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
3
Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with patient-controlled epidural analgesia after lumbar spinal fusion.腰椎融合术后患者自控静脉镇痛与患者自控硬膜外镇痛比较的前瞻性随机临床试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Apr 15;28(8):739-43.
4
[Patient-controlled postoperative analgesia in orthopedic surgery: epidural PCA versus intravenous PCA].[骨科手术中的患者自控术后镇痛:硬膜外自控镇痛与静脉自控镇痛]
Minerva Anestesiol. 1995 Jul-Aug;61(7-8):319-28.
5
Intravenous versus epidural analgesia after surgical repair of pectus excavatum.胸腔镜下漏斗胸矫正术后的静脉与硬膜外镇痛比较。
Am J Ther. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):398-403. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e318187de3e.
6
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for postoperative pain control after lumbar spine surgery.腰椎手术后用于术后疼痛控制的患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2008 Oct;20(4):256-60. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e31817ffe90.
7
Postoperative analgesia after major spine surgery: patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia.脊柱大手术后的术后镇痛:患者自控硬膜外镇痛与患者自控静脉镇痛的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2006 Nov;103(5):1311-7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane/0000247966.49492.72.
8
Comparison of epidural and intravenous patient controlled analgesia in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.根治性膀胱切除术患者硬膜外与静脉自控镇痛的比较
Can J Urol. 2009 Aug;16(4):4716-20.
9
Superiority of postoperative epidural over intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in orthopedic oncologic patients.骨科肿瘤患者术后硬膜外镇痛优于静脉自控镇痛。
Surgery. 2005 Nov;138(5):869-76. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.004.
10
Epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Differences in the postoperative course of cancer patients.硬膜外镇痛与静脉自控镇痛。癌症患者术后病程的差异。
Reg Anesth. 1994 Sep-Oct;19(5):307-15.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the effect of general anesthesia and combined epidural anesthesia on the anesthetic management of gynecological oncological surgery.全身麻醉与硬膜外联合麻醉对妇科肿瘤手术麻醉管理效果的比较。
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Dec 12;21(4):227-234. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2024.22623.
2
Blended (Combined Spinal and General) vs. General Anesthesia for Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study.混合麻醉(腰麻与全麻联合)与全身麻醉用于腹部子宫切除术的对比:一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 19;12(14):4775. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144775.
3
Effects of intraoperative esketamine addition on gastrointestinal function after benign gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a double-blind, randomized controlled study.
鞘内注射氯胺酮对妇科良性腹腔镜手术后胃肠功能的影响:一项双盲、随机对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jun 23;23(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02184-z.
4
Improved Postoperative Pain Control for Cytoreductive Surgery in Women With Ovarian Cancer Using Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia.使用患者自控硬膜外镇痛改善卵巢癌女性减瘤手术术后疼痛控制
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 Mar;26(3):588-93. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000644.
5
Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations--Part II.妇科/肿瘤外科手术后护理指南:加速康复外科(ERAS®)学会推荐意见——第二部分
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb;140(2):323-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.019. Epub 2016 Jan 3.
6
Enhanced Recovery Pathways in Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology.妇科及妇科肿瘤学中的强化康复路径
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2015 Dec;70(12):780-92. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000259.
7
A Comparison of Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia With Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management After Major Gynecologic Oncologic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.妇科肿瘤大手术后患者自控硬膜外镇痛与静脉自控镇痛用于术后疼痛管理的比较:一项随机对照临床试验
Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Oct 17;5(5):e29540. doi: 10.5812/aapm.29540. eCollection 2015 Oct.
8
Biopsychosocial predictors of pain among women recovering from surgery for endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌手术后康复期女性疼痛的生物心理社会预测因素
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb;140(2):301-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
9
The effect of anesthesia choice on post-operative outcomes in women undergoing exploratory laparotomy for a suspected gynecologic malignancy.在疑似妇科恶性肿瘤的女性接受剖腹探查术时,麻醉选择对术后结果的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 May;133(2):278-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.027. Epub 2014 Feb 26.