Suppr超能文献

前瞻性与回顾性 ECG 门控在冠状动脉支架双源 CT 中的应用:图像质量、准确性和辐射剂量的比较。

Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for dual source CT of the coronary stent: comparison of image quality, accuracy, and radiation dose.

机构信息

Beijing Anzhen Hospital of the Capital University of Medical Sciences, China.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Mar;77(3):436-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Sep 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose of prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram (ECG) gated dual source computed tomography (DSCT) for the evaluation of the coronary stent, using conventional coronary angiography (CA) as a standard reference.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Sixty patients (heart rates ≤ 70 bpm) with previous stent implantation who were scheduled for CA were divided in two groups, receiving either prospective or retrospective ECG gated DSCT separately. Two reviewers scored coronary stent image quality and evaluated stent lumen.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in image quality between the two groups. In the prospective group, there were 86.4% (51/59) stents with interpretable images, in the retrospective group, there were 87.5% (49/56) stents with interpretable images. Image quality was not influenced by age, body mass index or heart rate in either group, but heart rate variability had a weak impact on the image quality of the prospective group. Image noise was higher in the prospective group, but this difference reached statistical significance only by using a smooth kernel reconstruction. Per-stent based sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were 100%, 84.1%, 68.2%, and 100%, respectively, in the prospective CT angiography group and 94.4%, 86.8%, 77.3%, and 97.1%, respectively, in the retrospective CT angiography group. There was a significant difference in the effective radiation dose between the two groups, mean effective dose in the prospective and retrospective group was 2.2 ± 0.5 mSv (1.5-3.2 mSv) and 14.6 ± 3.3 mSv (10.0-20.4 mSv) (p < .001) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with retrospective CT angiography, prospective CT angiography has a similar performance in assessing coronary stent patency, but a lower effective dose in selected patients with regular heart rates ≤ 70 bpm.

摘要

目的

通过与常规冠状动脉造影(CA)作为标准参考,比较前瞻性和回顾性心电门控双源 CT(DSCT)在评估冠状动脉支架方面的图像质量、诊断准确性和辐射剂量。

设计、设置和患者:将 60 例(心率≤70 次/分)有既往支架植入史且拟行 CA 的患者分为两组,分别行前瞻性和回顾性心电门控 DSCT 检查。两名观察者分别对冠状动脉支架的图像质量和支架管腔进行评分。

结果

两组间的图像质量无显著差异。前瞻性组 59 个支架中,有 86.4%(51/59)支架的图像可进行评估;回顾性组 49 个支架中,有 87.5%(49/56)支架的图像可进行评估。两组中,年龄、体重指数或心率均不影响图像质量,但心率变异性对前瞻性组的图像质量有一定影响。前瞻性组的图像噪声较高,但仅采用平滑核重建时差异才有统计学意义。前瞻性 CT 血管造影组的支架每支敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 100%、84.1%、68.2%和 100%,回顾性 CT 血管造影组分别为 94.4%、86.8%、77.3%和 97.1%。两组间有效辐射剂量差异有统计学意义,前瞻性组和回顾性组的平均有效剂量分别为 2.2±0.5 mSv(1.5-3.2 mSv)和 14.6±3.3 mSv(10.0-20.4 mSv)(p<0.001)。

结论

与回顾性 CT 血管造影相比,在心率≤70 次/分的规则心率的特定患者中,前瞻性 CT 血管造影在评估冠状动脉支架通畅性方面具有相似的性能,但有效剂量较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验