Suppr超能文献

癌症患者吸入吗啡:使用药代动力学、肺功能和气体测量参数比较不同的雾化技术。

Morphine inhalation by cancer patients: a comparison of different nebulization techniques using pharmacokinetic, spirometric, and gasometric parameters.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care, Collegium Medicum, Nicolas Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Nov;38(5):747-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Sep 24.

Abstract

Despite numerous case reports suggesting the value of morphine (M) nebulization in the treatment of breathlessness, only a few clinical trials have been able to support this. The reason for this could lie in the lack of understanding of the localization of opioid receptors in the airways and the biopharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics of nebulized morphine. In the present study, we compared two different methods of pneumodosimetric nebulization: the Bronchial Control Treatment System-Sidestream (BCTS-S) and the Bronchial Control Treatment System-Micro Cirrus (BCTS-MC). The first method delivers relatively large aerosol particles (2-5microm) preferentially to the bronchial tree and trachea. In the BCTS-MC method, small aerosol particles (0.5-2microm) mostly reach the alveoli. Ten patients with cancer were randomly assigned to either the BCTS-S or BCTS-MC inhalation of 5 mg morphine HCl. Patients using the BCTS-S method inhaled a morphine dose in 6.6+/-2 minutes, whereas with the BCTS-MC method, the inhalation time was 28.8+/-8 minutes. The areas under the curve of morphine and glucuronides were several times higher after BCTS-S than after BCTS-MC. The proportion of morphine-3-glucuronide to morphine-6-glucuronide (M6) was, on average, close to one for both methods. From the same amount of morphine in the BCTS-S method, five times more M6 was produced. In both methods, the time to maximum concentration for morphine metabolites was 20-40 minutes, much shorter than expected from oral, intranasal, or intravenous administration. The study shows that the method of inhalation may have a profound effect on the pharmacokinetics of morphine. It is possible that the lungs metabolize morphine to glucuronides themselves and in different proportions from those seen after systemic administration. The BCTS-S method was found to be potentially superior to the BCTS-MC method in local action in the lungs.

摘要

尽管有许多病例报告表明吗啡(M)雾化吸入在治疗呼吸困难方面有价值,但只有少数临床试验能够支持这一点。造成这种情况的原因可能在于对气道阿片受体定位以及雾化吗啡的生物药剂学和药代动力学缺乏了解。在本研究中,我们比较了两种不同的气动雾化方法:支气管控制治疗系统-侧流(BCTS-S)和支气管控制治疗系统-微环(BCTS-MC)。第一种方法优先将相对较大的气溶胶颗粒(2-5μm)输送到支气管树和气管。在 BCTS-MC 方法中,小的气溶胶颗粒(0.5-2μm)主要到达肺泡。10 名癌症患者被随机分配到 BCTS-S 或 BCTS-MC 吸入 5mg 盐酸吗啡。使用 BCTS-S 方法的患者在 6.6+/-2 分钟内吸入吗啡剂量,而使用 BCTS-MC 方法的患者吸入时间为 28.8+/-8 分钟。BCTS-S 后,吗啡和葡萄糖醛酸的曲线下面积(AUC)高出数倍。两种方法的吗啡-3-葡萄糖醛酸与吗啡-6-葡萄糖醛酸(M6)的比例平均接近 1。从 BCTS-S 方法中相同数量的吗啡中,产生了五倍的 M6。在两种方法中,吗啡代谢物的最大浓度时间为 20-40 分钟,比口服、鼻内或静脉给药预期的时间要短得多。该研究表明,吸入方法可能对吗啡的药代动力学产生深远影响。肺部自身可能会将吗啡代谢为葡萄糖醛酸,并且与全身给药后所见的比例不同。BCTS-S 方法在肺部的局部作用方面被发现优于 BCTS-MC 方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验