Suppr超能文献

健康受试者的周期性交替模式与睡眠质量——不同的睡眠质量评估方法是否存在第一晚效应?

Cyclic alternating pattern and sleep quality in healthy subjects--is there a first-night effect on different approaches of sleep quality?

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Biol Psychol. 2010 Jan;83(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.09.009. Epub 2009 Sep 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) is defined as periodic EEG activity during NREM sleep that reflects unstable sleep and represents a marker of instability of the sleep process. The aim of the present investigation was to analyze sleep quality of 28 healthy subjects (mean age 53.3+/-21.3 years) over two consecutive nights and determine potential differences between them ("first-night effect").

METHODS

Evaluations comprised objective and subjective sleep variables as well as macrostructural and microstructural variables of sleep.

RESULTS

Macrostructural analysis showed significant differences between the first and the second sleep laboratory night in REM latency (122.39+/-60.46 min vs. 95.43+/-36.60 min; T=3.431; p=0.002) and the amount of sleep stage 1 (42.60+/-21.80 min vs. 39.70+/-18.95 min; T=2.223; p=0.035). Microstructural analysis revealed a significant decrease in the CAP rate (1st night: 33.29%; 2nd night: 26.34%; T=3.288; p=0.003) and in the amount of subtype A2 (74.79+/-43.47 vs. 58.50+/-23.22; T=2.185; p=0.038). Subjective variables also demonstrated a significant increase of drive (T=2.564; p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

Healthy subjects show hardly any macrostructural differences between the first and the second night in the sleep laboratory. On the microstructural level differences in CAP variables were found.

SIGNIFICANCE

Microstructural analysis can be seen as a further approach to the classification of sleep and CAP turned out to be sensitive to environmental influences on sleep.

摘要

目的

周期性交替模式(CAP)被定义为 NREM 睡眠期间周期性的 EEG 活动,反映了睡眠的不稳定,代表了睡眠过程不稳定的一个标志。本研究的目的是分析 28 名健康受试者(平均年龄 53.3+/-21.3 岁)在两个连续晚上的睡眠质量,并确定它们之间的潜在差异(“第一晚效应”)。

方法

评估包括客观和主观的睡眠变量以及睡眠的宏观结构和微观结构变量。

结果

宏观结构分析显示,在 REM 潜伏期(122.39+/-60.46 min 与 95.43+/-36.60 min;T=3.431;p=0.002)和 1 期睡眠时间(42.60+/-21.80 min 与 39.70+/-18.95 min;T=2.223;p=0.035)上,第一晚和第二晚睡眠实验室之间存在显著差异。微观结构分析显示 CAP 率(第一晚:33.29%;第二晚:26.34%;T=3.288;p=0.003)和 A2 亚型数量(74.79+/-43.47 与 58.50+/-23.22;T=2.185;p=0.038)显著下降。主观变量也显示出驱动力的显著增加(T=2.564;p=0.016)。

结论

健康受试者在睡眠实验室的第一晚和第二晚之间几乎没有显示出宏观结构上的差异。在微观结构水平上,发现了 CAP 变量的差异。

意义

微观结构分析可以看作是对睡眠分类的进一步方法,CAP 被证明对睡眠的环境影响敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验