Institute for Systems Neuroscience and NeuroImage Nord Hamburg-Kiel-Lübeck, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.040. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
In classical Pavlovian fear conditioning, a neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus, CS) comes to be evaluated as threatening due to its association with an aversive stimulus (unconditioned stimulus, UCS), and elicits fear. In a subtype of fear conditioning paradigms, called instructed fear or anticipatory anxiety, subjects are made aware of the CS-UCS association prior to actually experiencing it. Initial fear elicitation during this type of conditioning results from the negative evaluation of the CS as a consequence of CS-UCS contingency awareness. Prior reports have suggested that this conscious appraisal process is mediated by a variety of brain regions, including rostral dorsomedial prefrontal/dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dmPFC/dACC), lateral prefrontal cortex (lPFC), posterior cingulate, hippocampus/parahippocampus, and nucleus accumbens, but there is little overlap between results. We reasoned that a formal meta-analysis of existing instructed fear studies should help narrow down the search for conscious appraisal areas in fear conditioning to those consistently activated across studies. We found consistent activation in rostral dmPFC but not in the other candidate areas. These results allow for maintaining the theory that the rostral dmPFC is involved in conscious threat appraisal. We also report a meta-analysis of uninstructed (classical) fear conditioning studies in which we found notable activation in more posterior parts of the dmPFC/dACC that overlapped with some of the instructed fear activations. These data suggest that mid regions of the dmPFC/dACC are part of a "core" fear network that is activated irrespective of how fear was learnt.
在经典的巴甫洛夫式恐惧条件反射中,由于中性刺激(条件刺激,CS)与厌恶刺激(非条件刺激,UCS)相关联,因此被评估为具有威胁性,并引发恐惧。在恐惧条件反射的一种亚型中,称为指示性恐惧或预期性焦虑,在实际体验之前,会让受试者意识到 CS-UCS 的关联。在这种类型的条件反射中,最初的恐惧引发是由于 CS-UCS 连续性意识导致 CS 的负面评价。先前的报告表明,这种有意识的评估过程是由多种大脑区域介导的,包括背侧前额叶/前扣带回皮质(dmPFC/dACC)的背侧、外侧前额叶皮质(lPFC)、后扣带回、海马/旁海马体和伏隔核,但结果之间几乎没有重叠。我们推断,对现有指示性恐惧研究的正式元分析应该有助于将恐惧条件反射中对有意识评估区域的搜索缩小到那些在研究中一致激活的区域。我们发现,在背侧 dmPFC 的前部发现了一致的激活,但在其他候选区域则没有。这些结果使我们能够维持这样一种理论,即背侧 dmPFC 参与有意识的威胁评估。我们还报告了对非指示性(经典)恐惧条件反射研究的元分析,我们发现 dmPFC/dACC 的更后部有显著的激活,与一些指示性恐惧激活重叠。这些数据表明,dmPFC/dACC 的中间区域是激活的“核心”恐惧网络的一部分,无论恐惧是如何习得的。