• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人(65 岁及以上)流感疫苗接种的时间。

The timing of influenza vaccination for older adults (65 years and older).

机构信息

Section of Decision Sciences and Clinical Systems Modeling, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2009 Nov 23;27(50):7110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.056. Epub 2009 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.056
PMID:19786135
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2783217/
Abstract

While studies have found influenza vaccination to be cost-effective in older adults (65 years or older), they have not looked at how the vaccine's economic value may vary with the timing of vaccine administration. We developed a set of computer simulation models to evaluate the economic impact of vaccinating older adults at different months. Our models delineated the costs and utility losses in delaying vaccination past October and suggest that policy makers and payors may consider structuring incentives (< or =$2.50 per patient) to vaccinate in October. Our results also suggest that vaccination is still cost-effective through the end of February.

摘要

虽然研究发现流感疫苗对老年人(65 岁及以上)具有成本效益,但它们没有研究疫苗的经济价值如何随疫苗接种时间的不同而变化。我们开发了一组计算机模拟模型,以评估在不同月份为老年人接种疫苗的经济影响。我们的模型描述了将疫苗接种推迟到 10 月以后所产生的成本和效用损失,并表明政策制定者和支付方可能会考虑制定激励措施(每位患者<或=2.50 美元),以鼓励在 10 月接种疫苗。我们的结果还表明,疫苗接种在 2 月底之前仍然具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
The timing of influenza vaccination for older adults (65 years and older).老年人(65 岁及以上)流感疫苗接种的时间。
Vaccine. 2009 Nov 23;27(50):7110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.056. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
2
Economics of influenza vaccine administration timing for children.儿童流感疫苗接种时机的经济学。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Mar;16(3):e75-e85.
3
Cost-effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine in adults aged 65 years and older: an economic evaluation of data from a randomised controlled trial.高剂量与标准剂量灭活流感疫苗在 65 岁及以上老年人中的成本效益:一项来自随机对照试验数据的经济学评价。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Dec;15(12):1459-66. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00249-2. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
4
The cost effectiveness of influenza vaccination for adults aged 50 to 64 years: a model-based analysis for Spain.50至64岁成年人流感疫苗接种的成本效益:西班牙基于模型的分析
Vaccine. 2007 Sep 28;25(39-40):6900-10. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.07.033. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
5
Cost effectiveness of vaccination against pandemic influenza in European countries: mathematical modelling analysis.欧洲国家大流行性流感疫苗接种的成本效益:数学模型分析。
BMJ. 2012 Jul 12;345:e4445. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4445.
6
Implementing an influenza vaccination programme for adults aged ≥65 years in Poland: a cost-effectiveness analysis.在波兰为≥65 岁老年人实施流感疫苗接种计划:成本效益分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Feb 1;32(2):73-85. doi: 10.2165/11594030-000000000-00000.
7
Cost Effectiveness of Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines Compared with Trivalent Influenza Vaccines in Young Children and Older Adults in Korea.韩国儿童和老年人中四价流感疫苗与三价流感疫苗的成本效果比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Dec;36(12):1475-1490. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0715-5.
8
Cost-effectiveness of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) vaccination in the United States.2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感大流行疫苗接种在美国的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022308. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Routine Childhood Vaccination Against Seasonal Influenza in Germany.德国季节性流感常规儿童疫苗接种的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2021 Jan;24(1):32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.05.022. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
10
Cost-effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination in WHO-defined high-risk populations in Bangladesh.季节性流感疫苗接种在孟加拉国世界卫生组织定义的高危人群中的成本效益。
J Glob Health. 2024 Jul 19;14:04126. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04126.

引用本文的文献

1
How the Timing of Annual COVID-19 Vaccination of Nursing Home Residents and Staff Affects Its Value.养老院居民和工作人员的年度 COVID-19 疫苗接种时间如何影响其价值。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Apr;25(4):639-646.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
2
Economic evaluation of seasonal influenza vaccination in elderly and health workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人和医护人员季节性流感疫苗接种的经济评估:系统评价与荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 21;47:101410. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101410. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Inclusion of Safety-Related Issues in Economic Evaluations for Seasonal Influenza Vaccines: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Data Resource Profile: The Human Mortality Database (HMD).数据资源简介:人类死亡率数据库(HMD)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;44(5):1549-56. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv105. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
2
Influenza vaccination of recommended adult populations, U.S., 1989-2005.1989 - 2005年美国推荐成年人群的流感疫苗接种情况
Vaccine. 2008 Mar 25;26(14):1786-93. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.040. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
3
Where high-risk adults receive influenza vaccine during a shortage.高危成年人在流感疫苗短缺期间接种流感疫苗的情况。
季节性流感疫苗经济评估中安全相关问题的纳入:一项系统综述。
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Feb 2;9(2):111. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020111.
4
Attractive Flu Shot: A Behavioral Approach to Increasing Influenza Vaccination Uptake Rates.有吸引力的流感疫苗接种:提高流感疫苗接种率的行为方法。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Aug;40(6):774-784. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20944190. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
5
The Cost of Interventions to Increase Influenza Vaccination: A Systematic Review.增加流感疫苗接种率的干预措施成本:系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Feb;54(2):299-315. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.11.010. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
6
Does cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccine choice vary across the U.S.? An agent-based modeling study.美国不同地区流感疫苗选择的成本效益是否存在差异?一项基于主体的建模研究。
Vaccine. 2017 Jul 13;35(32):3974-3981. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.093. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
7
Does Choice of Influenza Vaccine Type Change Disease Burden and Cost-Effectiveness in the United States? An Agent-Based Modeling Study.在美国,流感疫苗类型的选择会改变疾病负担和成本效益吗?一项基于主体的建模研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 May 1;185(9):822-831. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww229.
8
Unremarked or Unperformed? Systematic Review on Reporting of Validation Efforts of Health Economic Decision Models in Seasonal Influenza and Early Breast Cancer.未被关注还是未被执行?关于季节性流感和早期乳腺癌健康经济决策模型验证工作报告的系统评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Sep;34(9):833-45. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0410-3.
9
An economic model assessing the value of microneedle patch delivery of the seasonal influenza vaccine.一种评估季节性流感疫苗微针贴片给药价值的经济模型。
Vaccine. 2015 Sep 8;33(37):4727-36. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.02.076. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
10
Quantifying the economic value and quality of life impact of earlier influenza vaccination.量化早期流感疫苗接种的经济价值和对生活质量的影响。
Med Care. 2015 Mar;53(3):218-29. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000302.
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Nov 26;167(21):2366-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.21.2366.
4
Influenza vaccine coverage and the attack rate of influenza-like illness among the elderly in Portugal: is there a correlation?葡萄牙老年人的流感疫苗接种率与类流感疾病发病率:二者存在关联吗?
Euro Surveill. 2007 May 17;12(5):E070517.2. doi: 10.2807/esw.12.20.03195-en.
5
A systematic analysis of influenza vaccine shortage policies.流感疫苗短缺政策的系统分析
Public Health. 2008 Feb;122(2):183-91. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
6
Local health department responses during the 2004-2005 influenza vaccine shortage.2004 - 2005年流感疫苗短缺期间地方卫生部门的应对措施。
J Community Health. 2007 Aug;32(4):283-97. doi: 10.1007/s10900-007-9049-5.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of influenza vaccination for people aged 65 and over in Japan.日本65岁及以上人群流感疫苗接种的成本效益分析。
Vaccine. 2007 Aug 29;25(35):6511-21. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.05.067. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
8
Vaccines for preventing influenza in the elderly.用于预防老年人流感的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD004876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004876.pub2.
9
Impact of the 2004-2005 influenza vaccine shortage on immunization practices in long-term care facilities.2004 - 2005年流感疫苗短缺对长期护理机构免疫接种实践的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;27(4):383-7. doi: 10.1086/503179. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
10
Vaccination versus treatment of influenza in working adults: a cost-effectiveness analysis.在职成年人中流感疫苗接种与治疗的比较:一项成本效益分析。
Am J Med. 2005 Jan;118(1):68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.03.044.