Mukherjee Debraj, Kosztowski Thomas, Zaidi Hasan A, Jallo George, Carson Benjamin S, Chang David C, Quiñones-Hinojosa Alfredo
Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Pediatrics. 2009 Oct;124(4):e688-96. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0377. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
The objective of this study was to investigate whether disparities in access to high-volume centers for neurooncological care existed in the United States in 1988-2005.
A retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1988-2005) was performed, with additional factors incorporated from the Area Resource File (2006). International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis/procedure coding was used to identify patients. High-volume centers were defined as those with > or =50 neurosurgical cases per year. Patients >18 years of age were excluded. Covariates included age, gender, race, Charlson Index score, insurance, and county-level characteristics (including median home value, proportion of foreign born residents, and county neurosurgeon density). Multivariate analysis was performed by using multiple logistic regression models. P values of <.05 were considered statistically significant.
A total of 4421 patients were identified; 1651 (37.34%) were admitted to high-volume centers. Overall access to high-volume centers improved slightly over the 18-year period (odds ratio [OR]: 1.04). Factors associated with greater access to high-volume centers included greater county neurosurgeon density (OR: 1.72) and greater county home value (OR: 1.66). Factors associated with worse access included Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 0.68) and each 1% increase in foreign residents per county (OR: 0.59). All reported P values were <.05.
This study demonstrates that racial and socioeconomic disparities in access to high-volume neurooncological care exist for the pediatric population. We also identify numerous prehospital factors that potentially contribute to persistent disparities and may be amenable to change through national health policy interventions.
本研究的目的是调查1988 - 2005年美国在获得神经肿瘤护理的大容量中心方面是否存在差异。
对全国住院患者样本(1988 - 2005年)进行回顾性分析,并纳入来自区域资源文件(2006年)的其他因素。使用国际疾病分类第九版诊断/程序编码来识别患者。大容量中心定义为每年有≥50例神经外科病例的中心。排除年龄>18岁的患者。协变量包括年龄、性别、种族、查尔森指数评分(Charlson Index score)、保险以及县级特征(包括房屋中位价值、外国出生居民比例和县级神经外科医生密度)。使用多个逻辑回归模型进行多变量分析。P值<.05被认为具有统计学意义。
共识别出4421例患者;1651例(37.34%)被收治到大容量中心。在这18年期间,总体获得大容量中心的机会略有改善(优势比[OR]:1.04)。与获得大容量中心机会更大相关的因素包括更高的县级神经外科医生密度(OR:1.72)和更高的县级房屋价值(OR:1.66)。与获得机会更差相关的因素包括西班牙裔种族(OR:0.68)以及每个县外国居民每增加1%(OR:0.59)。所有报告的P值均<.05。
本研究表明,儿科人群在获得大容量神经肿瘤护理方面存在种族和社会经济差异。我们还确定了许多院前因素,这些因素可能导致持续存在的差异,并且可能通过国家卫生政策干预而得以改变。