• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病药物选择决策辅助工具:一项随机试验。

The diabetes mellitus medication choice decision aid: a randomized trial.

作者信息

Mullan Rebecca J, Montori Victor M, Shah Nilay D, Christianson Teresa J H, Bryant Sandra C, Guyatt Gordon H, Perestelo-Perez Lilisbeth I, Stroebel Robert J, Yawn Barbara P, Yapuncich Victor, Breslin Maggie A, Pencille Laurie, Smith Steven A

机构信息

Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit, Mayo Center for Translational Science Activities, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 28;169(17):1560-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.293.

DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.293
PMID:19786674
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient involvement in the choice of antihyperglycemic agents could improve adherence and optimize glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot, cluster randomized trial of Diabetes Medication Choice, a decision aid that describes 5 antihyperglycemic drugs, their treatment burden (adverse effects, administration, and self-monitoring demands), and impact on hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels. Twenty-one clinicians were randomized to use the decision aid during the clinical encounter and 19 to dispense usual care and an educational pamphlet. We used surveys and video analysis to assess postvisit decisional outcomes, and medical and pharmacy records to assess 6-month medication adherence and HbA(1c) levels.

RESULTS

Compared with usual care patients (n = 37), patients receiving the decision aid (n = 48) found the tool more helpful (clustered-adjusted mean difference [AMD] in a 7-point scale, 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.72); had improved knowledge (AMD, 1.10 of 10 questions; 95% CI, 0.11-2.09); and had more involvement in making decisions about diabetes medications (AMD, 21.8 of 100; 95% CI, 13.0-30.5). At 6-month follow-up, both groups had nearly perfect medication use (median, 100% of days covered), with better adherence (AMD, 9% more days covered; 95% CI, 4%-14%) and persistence (AMD, 12 more days covered; 95% CI, 3-21 days) in the usual care group, and no significant impact on HbA(1c) levels (AMD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.49 to 0.50).

CONCLUSION

An innovative decision aid effectively involved patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in decisions about their medications but did not improve adherence or HbA(1c) levels. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00388050.

摘要

背景

患者参与降糖药物的选择可提高2型糖尿病患者的依从性并优化血糖控制。

方法

我们开展了一项关于糖尿病药物选择的试点整群随机试验,这是一种决策辅助工具,描述了5种降糖药物、它们的治疗负担(不良反应、给药方式及自我监测要求)以及对糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平的影响。21名临床医生被随机分配在临床诊疗过程中使用该决策辅助工具,19名临床医生提供常规护理并发放一份教育手册。我们通过调查和视频分析评估就诊后的决策结果,通过医疗和药房记录评估6个月的药物依从性和HbA1c水平。

结果

与接受常规护理的患者(n = 37)相比,使用决策辅助工具的患者(n = 48)认为该工具更有帮助(在7分制量表中的整群调整均值差[AMD]为0.38;95%置信区间[CI]为0.04 - 0.72);知识有所提高(10道题目的AMD为1.10;95% CI为0.11 - 2.09);并且在糖尿病药物决策方面的参与度更高(100分中的AMD为21.8;95% CI为13.0 - 30.5)。在6个月的随访中,两组的药物使用情况几乎都达到完美(中位数为覆盖天数的100%),常规护理组的依从性更好(AMD为多覆盖9%的天数;95% CI为4% - 14%)且持续性更佳(AMD为多覆盖12天;95% CI为3 - 21天),但对HbA1c水平无显著影响(AMD为0.01;95% CI为 - 0.49至0.50)。

结论

一种创新的决策辅助工具有效地让2型糖尿病患者参与到药物决策中,但未提高依从性或HbA1c水平。试验注册 clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00388050。

相似文献

1
The diabetes mellitus medication choice decision aid: a randomized trial.糖尿病药物选择决策辅助工具:一项随机试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 28;169(17):1560-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.293.
2
Use of the Diabetes Medication Choice Decision Aid in patients with type 2 diabetes in Greece: a cluster randomised trial.希腊2型糖尿病患者使用糖尿病药物选择决策辅助工具:一项整群随机试验。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e012185. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012185.
3
Comparison of community health worker-led diabetes medication decision-making support for low-income Latino and African American adults with diabetes using e-health tools versus print materials: a randomized, controlled trial.利用电子健康工具与印刷材料比较社区卫生工作者主导的针对低收入拉丁裔和非裔美国糖尿病成人的糖尿病药物决策支持:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Nov 18;161(10 Suppl):S13-22. doi: 10.7326/M13-3012.
4
The impact of decision aids to enhance shared decision making for diabetes (the DAD study): protocol of a cluster randomized trial.决策辅助工具对促进糖尿病患者共同决策的影响(DAD 研究):一项群组随机试验方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 28;12:130. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-130.
5
Making sense of diabetes medication decisions: a mixed methods cluster randomized trial using a conversation aid intervention.理解糖尿病药物治疗决策:使用对话辅助干预的混合方法聚类随机试验。
Endocrine. 2022 Feb;75(2):377-391. doi: 10.1007/s12020-021-02861-4. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
6
Effect of the statin choice encounter decision aid in Spanish patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial.他汀类药物选择决策辅助工具对西班牙2型糖尿病患者的影响:一项随机试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Feb;99(2):295-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.032. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
7
Shared Decision Making for Antidepressants in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Trial.基层医疗中抗抑郁药物的共同决策:一项整群随机试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1761-70. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5214.
8
Informed shared decision-making programme for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial.基层医疗中2型糖尿病患者的知情共同决策项目:整群随机对照试验
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e024004. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024004.
9
Shared decision making for patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial in primary care.2 型糖尿病患者的共同决策:初级保健中的随机试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 8;13:301. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-301.
10
A retrospective analysis of the fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin and pharmacotherapy change patterns among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.2型糖尿病患者空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白及药物治疗变化模式的回顾性分析
Clin Ther. 2008 Feb;30(2):287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.02.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the feasibility of study methods for a future trial-based economic evaluation of a multistage shared decision-making program for type 2 diabetes mellitus: Protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled pilot study.评估未来一项针对2型糖尿病多阶段共享决策项目基于试验的经济评估研究方法的可行性:一项整群随机对照试验性研究方案
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 5;20(8):e0300944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300944. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing physicians' agreement and the completeness of the decision aid 'arriba Diabetes': a cross-sectional study.评估医生的一致性以及决策辅助工具“arriba糖尿病”的完整性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jul 8;26(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02887-x.
3
Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.
消费者参与初级保健中药物安全干预或服务的设计和开发:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70092. doi: 10.1111/hex.70092.
4
Effectiveness of shared decision-making for glycaemic control among type 2 diabetes mellitus adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.共享决策对 2 型糖尿病成年患者血糖控制效果的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 31;19(7):e0306296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306296. eCollection 2024.
5
Optimization of type 2 diabetes care in adults aged 65 or older: Practical approach to deintensification.65岁及以上成年人2型糖尿病护理的优化:简化治疗的实用方法。
Can Fam Physician. 2024 Jun;70(6):391-394. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7006391.
6
Development and Iterative Design of Peer-based Discussions about Heart Health for Women.针对女性心脏健康的同伴式讨论的开发与迭代设计
medRxiv. 2024 May 10:2024.05.09.24307138. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.09.24307138.
7
Shared decision-making approach to type 2 diabetes management.2 型糖尿病管理的共同决策方法。
Can Fam Physician. 2024 May;70(5):310-315. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7005310.
8
Patient Characteristics and the Extent to Which Clinicians Involve Patients in Decision Making: Secondary Analyses of Pooled Data.患者特征及临床医生在决策中让患者参与的程度:汇总数据的二次分析。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Apr;44(3):346-356. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241231721. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
9
Patient Involvement in Care, Psychosocial Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Pilot Study.肥厚型心肌病患者参与治疗、心理社会结局及生活质量:一项试点研究。
CJC Open. 2023 Nov 4;6(3):539-543. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.11.002. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Shared Decision-Making in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.共享决策在心血管危险因素管理中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243779. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3779.