Institute of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Jul;22(7):779-86. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328331b654.
Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis represent the two major forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Recent research points out the role of uncontrolled intestinal inflammation in the pathogenesis of IBD. Therefore, there is a growing interest in developing novel biologic therapies targeting specific molecules of the inflammatory cascade. Among them, anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents (i.e. infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol) have proved to be effective, particularly for patients with refractory IBD. These biological therapies have changed, at least partially, the clinical course and medical management of IBD. However, the administration of anti-TNF drugs has also been associated with serious side-effects, which have raised concerns on the application of these drugs in clinical practice. The goal of this review is to provide an update and analyze the pros and cons of using anti-TNF therapies in the treatment of IBD.
克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎是炎症性肠病(IBD)的两种主要形式。最近的研究指出,肠道炎症失控在 IBD 的发病机制中起作用。因此,人们越来越感兴趣地开发针对炎症级联反应中特定分子的新型生物治疗方法。其中,抗肿瘤坏死因子(anti-TNF)制剂(如英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗、培塞利珠单抗)已被证明有效,特别是对难治性 IBD 患者。这些生物疗法至少在一定程度上改变了 IBD 的临床病程和医学管理。然而,抗 TNF 药物的给药也与严重的副作用相关,这引起了人们对这些药物在临床实践中应用的关注。本综述的目的是提供一个更新,并分析使用抗 TNF 治疗 IBD 的优缺点。