• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从判断与决策领域看饮食行为。

A perspective on eating behaviors from the field of judgment and decision making.

机构信息

Decision Research, 1201 Oak Street, Suite 200, Eugene, OR 97401, USA.

出版信息

Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38 Suppl 1:S81-7. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9121-8. Epub 2009 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1007/s12160-009-9121-8
PMID:19787307
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this commentary, I review a key theme-the construction of preferences-that underlies the psychology of judgment and decision making and may influence eating behaviors. Its central idea is that, in many situations, we do not know what we prefer and, as a result, we construct our preferences "on the spot" based on internal and external cues available at the moment.

PURPOSE

To understand the extent of construction processes, one has to know both the decision maker (and how he or she draws meaning from information) and the environment she or he faces. I consider possible roles for affect and deliberation in the construction of eating preferences and also examine some existing evidence for two potentially important individual differences--numeracy (number ability) and aging.

CONCLUSION

Research implications concerning ways to improve eating behaviors are considered.

摘要

背景

在这篇评论中,我回顾了一个关键主题——偏好构建,它是判断和决策心理学的基础,可能会影响饮食行为。其核心思想是,在许多情况下,我们不知道自己喜欢什么,因此,我们会根据当下可用的内部和外部线索“当场”构建我们的偏好。

目的

要了解构建过程的程度,人们必须了解决策者(以及他或她如何从信息中获取意义)和他或她所面临的环境。我考虑了影响和深思熟虑在饮食偏好构建中的可能作用,还研究了两个潜在的重要个体差异——计算能力(数字能力)和衰老。

结论

考虑了关于改善饮食行为的研究意义。

相似文献

1
A perspective on eating behaviors from the field of judgment and decision making.从判断与决策领域看饮食行为。
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38 Suppl 1:S81-7. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9121-8. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
2
Changing family food and eating practices: the family food decision-making system.改变家庭饮食和饮食习惯:家庭食品决策系统。
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38 Suppl 1:S31-6. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9122-7.
3
Decision-making processes shaping the home food environments of young adult women with and without children.塑造有子女和无子女年轻成年女性家庭食物环境的决策过程。
Appetite. 2017 Jun 1;113:124-133. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.027. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
4
Decision making in eating behavior: state of the science and recommendations for future research.进食行为决策:科学现状及未来研究建议。
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38 Suppl 1:S88-92. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9125-4.
5
Decision making in eating behavior: interacting perspectives from the individual, family, and environment: an introduction.饮食行为中的决策:个体、家庭和环境的相互作用视角:引言
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38 Suppl 1:S1-3. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9128-1.
6
Distinguishing the affective and cognitive bases of implicit attitudes to improve prediction of food choices.区分内隐态度的情感和认知基础,以提高对食物选择的预测。
Appetite. 2016 Sep 1;104:33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
7
Emotional eating. Look beyond food for comfort.情绪化进食。别只靠食物来寻求慰藉。
Mayo Clin Womens Healthsource. 2009 Aug;13(8):7.
8
Children's knowledge of eating: An integrative review of the literature.儿童的饮食知识:文献综合综述
Appetite. 2016 Dec 1;107:534-548. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.120. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
9
Influencing Eating Choices: Biological Food Cues in Advertising and Packaging Alter Trajectories of Decision Making and Behavior.影响饮食选择:广告和包装中的生物食物线索改变了决策和行为轨迹。
Health Commun. 2017 Oct;32(10):1183-1191. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1214222. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
10
Interviews with low-income Pennsylvanians verify a need to enhance eating competence.对宾夕法尼亚州低收入人群的访谈证实了提高饮食能力的必要性。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Mar;109(3):468-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.11.032.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigation of opposition to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in older people hospitalized in acute geriatric services: the OPTAH pilot study protocol.急性老年服务住院老年人对诊断或治疗程序的反对情况调查:OPTAH 试点研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Dec 14;6(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00742-7.
2
Active engagement in a web-based tutorial to prevent obesity grounded in Fuzzy-Trace Theory predicts higher knowledge and gist comprehension.积极参与基于模糊痕迹理论的预防肥胖网络教程,可预测更高的知识水平和主旨理解能力。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1386-1398. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0794-1.
3
Contextual influences on eating behaviours: heuristic processing and dietary choices.
情境因素对饮食行为的影响:启发式加工与饮食选择。
Obes Rev. 2012 Sep;13(9):766-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01001.x. Epub 2012 May 3.