Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ergonomics. 2009 Sep;52(9):1104-18. doi: 10.1080/00140130902915947.
The goal of this study was to compare the effects of the task variables block mass, working height and one- vs. two-handed block handling on low back and shoulder loading during masonry work. In a mock-up of a masonry work site, nine masonry workers performed one- and two-handed block-lifting and block-placing tasks at varying heights (ranging from floor to shoulder level) with blocks of varying mass (ranging from 6 to 16 kg). Kinematics and ground reaction forces were measured and used in a 3-D linked segment model to calculate low back and shoulder loading. Increasing lifting height appeared to be the most effective way to reduce low back loading. However, working at shoulder level resulted in relatively high shoulder loading. Therefore, it was recommended to organise masonry work in such a way that blocks are handled with the hands at about iliac crest height as much as possible.
本研究旨在比较任务变量(砌块质量、工作高度和单手与双手搬运砌块)对砌体工作中腰背和肩部负荷的影响。在砌体工作模拟现场,9 名砌体工人以不同的高度(从地面到肩部水平)和不同质量(6-16 公斤)的砌块进行单手和双手砌块提起和放置任务。测量运动学和地面反作用力,并在 3D 链接节段模型中使用这些数据来计算腰背和肩部负荷。增加提升高度似乎是降低腰背负荷的最有效方法。然而,在肩部水平工作会导致肩部负荷相对较高。因此,建议以尽可能将砌块用手在髂嵴高度左右搬运的方式组织砌体工作。