Suppr超能文献

早期胚胎形态评估的观察者内和观察者间分析。

Intra- and inter-observer analysis in the morphological assessment of early-stage embryos.

机构信息

Leuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009 Sep 29;7:105. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-105.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-observer variability in the evaluation of embryo quality. Multilevel images of embryos on day 1, day 2 and day 3, were analysed using different morphological parameters.

METHODS

Multilevel images of embryos on day 1, day 2 and day 3, were analysed using a standard scoring system. The kappa coefficient was calculated to measure intra- and inter-observer variability before and after training sessions.

RESULTS

Good to excellent intra-observer agreement was present for most parameters exceptions being scoring the position of pronuclei and the presence of a cytoplasmic halo on day 1, multinucleation on day 2 and the size of fragments on day 3. Inter-observer agreement was only good to excellent for the number of blastomeres on day 2 and day 3 and the orientation of the cleavage axes on day 2. Training sessions had a positive impact on inter-observer agreement.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, assessment of morphological characteristics of early stage embryos using multilevel images was marked by a high intra-observer and a moderate inter-observer agreement. Training sessions were useful to increase inter-observer agreement.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定胚胎质量评估的观察者内和观察者间的可变性。使用不同的形态学参数对第 1、2 和 3 天的胚胎的多层次图像进行了分析。

方法

使用标准评分系统对第 1、2 和 3 天的胚胎的多层次图像进行了分析。计算了kappa 系数,以衡量培训前后的观察者内和观察者间的可变性。

结果

除了在第 1 天评估原核的位置和细胞质晕的存在、第 2 天多核和第 3 天碎片的大小等参数外,大多数参数的观察者内一致性良好到优秀。第 2 和第 3 天的卵裂球数量和第 2 天的卵裂轴方向的观察者间一致性仅为良好到优秀。培训课程对观察者间的一致性有积极的影响。

结论

总之,使用多层次图像评估早期胚胎的形态特征具有较高的观察者内一致性和中等的观察者间一致性。培训课程有助于提高观察者间的一致性。

相似文献

1
Intra- and inter-observer analysis in the morphological assessment of early-stage embryos.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009 Sep 29;7:105. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-105.
4
Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations.
Hum Reprod. 2013 Dec;28(12):3215-21. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det366. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
5
Inter- and Intra-Observer Agreement Between Embryologists for Cytoplasmic String Assessment in Day 5/6 Human Blastocysts.
Reprod Sci. 2023 Jun;30(6):1917-1926. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-01151-2. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
6
Inter-laboratory agreement on embryo classification and clinical decision: Conventional morphological assessment vs. time lapse.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 25;12(8):e0183328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183328. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

2
A generalized AI system for human embryo selection covering the entire IVF cycle via multi-modal contrastive learning.
Patterns (N Y). 2024 May 2;5(7):100985. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.100985. eCollection 2024 Jul 12.
3
Artificial intelligence system for outcome evaluations of human in vitro fertilization-derived embryos.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Aug 20;137(16):1939-1949. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003162. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
5
How great thou ART: biomechanical properties of oocytes and embryos as indicators of quality in assisted reproductive technologies.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 Feb 15;12:1342905. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1342905. eCollection 2024.
9
Deep learning for bioimage analysis in developmental biology.
Development. 2021 Sep 15;148(18). doi: 10.1242/dev.199616. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
10
PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF BLASTOCYST GRADE AFTER FROZEN EUPLOID EMBRYO TRANSFER IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT PREGNANCY LOSS.
F S Rep. 2020 Sep;1(2):113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

2
Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading.
Fertil Steril. 2006 Dec;86(6):1608-15. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.037. Epub 2006 Oct 30.
4
Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments.
Hum Reprod. 2006 Aug;21(8):2141-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del106. Epub 2006 Apr 10.
6
Characteristics of good diagnostic studies.
Semin Reprod Med. 2003 Feb;21(1):17-25. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39991.
9
What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?
Stat Med. 2000 Feb 29;19(4):453-73. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<453::aid-sim350>3.0.co;2-5.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验