• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术围手术期结局的前瞻性单机构比较。

A prospective single institution comparison of peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy.

作者信息

Baker Marshall S, Bentrem David J, Ujiki Michael B, Stocker Susan, Talamonti Mark S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, NorthShore University HealthSystem Campus, Evanston, IL 60201, USA.

出版信息

Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):635-43; discussion 643-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.045.

DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.045
PMID:19789022
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LP) is an emerging modality for managing benign and premalignant neoplasms of the pancreatic body and tail. The efficacy of LP has been examined in single and multi-institutional retrospective reviews but not compared prospectively to open distal pancreatectomy (ODP).

METHODS

We maintain a prospectively accruing database tracking peri-operative clinical parameters for all patients presenting to our tertiary care facility for treatment of pancreatic disease. We queried this database for patients undergoing LP or ODP between January 2003 and May 2008. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative characteristics were compared using standard statistical methods.

RESULTS

One-hundred twelve patients underwent distal pancreatectomy. Eighty-five underwent SDP. Twenty-eight LPs were attempted and 27 completed laparoscopically. One LP was converted to an open procedure because of bleeding and was excluded from study. In comparison to ODP, patients undergoing LP had statistically similar pre-operative demographics, disease comorbidities, tumor size, length of operation, rates of postoperative mortality, postoperative morbidity, and pancreatic fistula. Patients undergoing LP were less likely to have ductal adenocarcinoma and had fewer lymph nodes harvested in their resection but had a significantly shorter postoperative length of stay and significantly lower estimated blood loss than those undergoing ODP.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a safe, effective modality for managing premalignant neoplasms of the pancreatic body and tail, providing a morbidity rate comparable to that for ODP and substantially shorter length of stay. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy fails to provide a lymphadenectomy comparable to ODP. This may limit the applicability of LP to the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜胰体尾远端切除术(LP)是一种用于治疗胰体尾良性和癌前肿瘤的新兴术式。LP的疗效已在单机构和多机构回顾性研究中得到检验,但尚未与开放性胰体尾远端切除术(ODP)进行前瞻性比较。

方法

我们维护了一个前瞻性收集数据的数据库,跟踪所有到我们三级医疗中心治疗胰腺疾病的患者的围手术期临床参数。我们查询该数据库,找出2003年1月至2008年5月期间接受LP或ODP的患者。使用标准统计方法比较术前、术中和术后特征。

结果

112例患者接受了胰体尾远端切除术。85例行标准胰体尾远端切除术。尝试了28例LP,其中27例成功完成腹腔镜手术。1例LP因出血中转开放手术,被排除在研究之外。与ODP相比,接受LP的患者在术前人口统计学、疾病合并症、肿瘤大小、手术时间、术后死亡率、术后发病率和胰瘘发生率方面在统计学上相似。接受LP的患者患导管腺癌的可能性较小,切除术中清扫的淋巴结较少,但术后住院时间明显较短,估计失血量明显低于接受ODP的患者。

结论

腹腔镜胰体尾远端切除术是治疗胰体尾癌前肿瘤的一种安全、有效的术式,其发病率与ODP相当,住院时间明显缩短。腹腔镜胰体尾远端切除术未能提供与ODP相当的淋巴结清扫。这可能会限制LP在胰腺癌治疗中的应用。

相似文献

1
A prospective single institution comparison of peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术围手术期结局的前瞻性单机构比较。
Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):635-43; discussion 643-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.045.
2
Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution comparative study.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术:单机构比较研究
Arch Surg. 2010 Jul;145(7):616-21. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.120.
3
A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate?多中心分析腺癌行胰体尾切除术:腹腔镜切除术是否合适?
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):779-85, 786-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.033.
4
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy: a nonrandomized comparative study.腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术与开放远端胰腺切除术:一项非随机对照研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Aug;18(4):340-3. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181705d23.
5
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: evolution of a technique at a single institution.腹腔镜下胰体尾切除术:单中心技术演变。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Oct;211(4):503-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.06.010.
6
Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma.微创与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗导管腺癌的疗效比较。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Jun;148(6):525-31. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1673.
7
Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for the treatment of pancreatic disease.腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺疾病的安全性和有效性。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12(1):65-70. doi: 10.1007/s00534-004-0930-7.
8
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌:单中心经验
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2017 Jun;18(6):532-538. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1600541.
9
Laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy: a comparison of outcomes.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术:结局比较
Am Surg. 2009 Aug;75(8):671-9; discussion 679-80.
10
Laparoscopic resection of exocrine carcinoma in central and distal pancreas results in a high rate of radical resections and long postoperative survival.腹腔镜下切除胰腺中央和远端的外分泌癌可实现高比例的根治性切除和术后长期生存。
Surgery. 2012 May;151(5):717-23. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.12.016. Epub 2012 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer.中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO):胰腺癌诊疗指南
J Natl Cancer Cent. 2022 Aug 23;2(4):205-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.08.006. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy on Operative Time, Oncological Outcomes, Bleeding, Morbidity, and Mortality.腹腔镜与开放胰十二指肠切除术在手术时间、肿瘤学结局、出血、并发症及死亡率方面的比较
Cureus. 2024 Feb 1;16(2):e53387. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53387. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
The superior approach with the stomach roll-up technique improves intraoperative outcomes and facilitates learning laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study between the superior and inferior approach.
胃滚压技术的优越入路可改善术中结果,并有助于学习腹腔镜胰体尾切除术:上入路与下入路的对比研究。
Surg Today. 2020 Feb;50(2):153-162. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01855-0. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
4
The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy is a value-added proposition for patients undergoing care in moderate-volume and high-volume centers.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术对于在中、高容量中心接受治疗的患者来说是一个增值方案。
Surgery. 2019 Aug;166(2):166-171. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: better than open?腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术:比开放手术更好吗?
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug 1;3:49. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2018.07.04. eCollection 2018.
6
Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience.胰尾部切除术后胰腺残端闭合技术与胰瘘形成:荟萃分析和单中心经验。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0197553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197553. eCollection 2018.
7
Experience-based surgical approach to pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms with ovarian-type stroma.基于经验的伴有卵巢型间质的胰腺黏液性囊性肿瘤手术方法
Oncol Lett. 2018 Feb;15(2):2451-2458. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7627. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术:最新的荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2017 Nov 9;17(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0301-3.
9
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Cancer Provides Oncologic Outcomes and Overall Survival Identical to Open Distal Pancreatectomy.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术治疗癌症的肿瘤学结果和总体生存率与开腹胰体尾切除术相同。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Oct;21(10):1620-1625. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3506-y. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
10
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer is safe and effective.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺癌安全有效。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5633-7. Epub 2017 Jun 22.