Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺癌安全有效。

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer is safe and effective.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Dr, EH 541, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5633-7. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the short-term and oncologic outcomes of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP).

METHODS

Consecutive cases of distal pancreatectomy (DP) (n = 422) were reviewed at a single high-volume institution over a 10-year period (2005-2014). Inclusion criteria consisted of any patient with PDAC by surgical pathology. Ninety-day outcomes were monitored through a prospectively maintained pancreatic resection database. The Social Security Death Index was used for 5-year survival. Two-way statistical analyses were used to compare categories; variance was reported with standard error of the mean; * indicates P value <0.05.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients underwent DP for PDAC. Thirty-three underwent LDP and 46 ODP. There were no statistical differences in demographics, BMI, and ASA classification. Intraoperative and surgical pathology variables were comparable for LDP versus ODP: operative time (3.9 ± 0.2 vs. 4.2 ± 0.2 h), duct size, gland texture, stump closure, tumor size (3.3 ± 0.3 vs. 4.0 ± 0.4 cm), lymph node harvest (14.5 ± 1.1 vs. 17.5 ± 1.2), tumor stage (see table), and negative surgical margins (77 vs. 87%). Patients who underwent LDP experienced lower blood loss (310 ± 68 vs. 597 ± 95 ml; P = 0.016*) and required fewer transfusions (0 vs. 13; P = 0.0008*). Patients who underwent LDP had fewer positive lymph nodes (0.8 ± 0.2 vs. 1.6 ± 0.3; P = 0.04*) and a lower incidence of type C pancreatic fistula (0 vs. 13%; P = 0.03*). Median follow-up for all patients was 11.4 months. Long-term oncologic outcomes revealed similar outcomes including distant or local recurrence (30 vs. 52%; P = 0.05) and median survival (18 vs. 15 months), as well as 1-year (73 vs. 59%), 3-year (22 vs. 21%), and 5-year (20 vs. 15%) survival for LDP and ODP, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this series suggest that LDP is a safe surgical approach that is comparable from an oncologic standpoint to ODP for the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

摘要

目的

比较接受腹腔镜胰体尾切除术(LDP)和开腹胰体尾切除术(ODP)治疗胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的短期和肿瘤学结果。

方法

在一家高容量的单中心回顾性分析了 10 年期间(2005-2014 年)连续接受胰体尾切除术(DP)的 422 例患者。纳入标准为手术病理学证实的任何 PDAC 患者。通过前瞻性维护的胰腺切除术数据库监测 90 天的结果。5 年生存率使用社会安全死亡指数。使用双向统计分析比较类别;方差用均数的标准误差表示;*表示 P 值<0.05。

结果

79 例患者因 PDAC 接受 DP。33 例行 LDP,46 例行 ODP。LDP 和 ODP 组在人口统计学、BMI 和 ASA 分类方面无统计学差异。LDP 与 ODP 的术中及手术病理变量相当:手术时间(3.9±0.2 vs. 4.2±0.2 h)、管腔大小、腺体质地、残端闭合、肿瘤大小(3.3±0.3 vs. 4.0±0.4 cm)、淋巴结清扫(14.5±1.1 vs. 17.5±1.2)、肿瘤分期(见表)和阴性切缘(77% vs. 87%)。行 LDP 的患者术中出血量较少(310±68 比 597±95 ml;P=0.016*),输血需求较少(0 比 13;P=0.0008*)。行 LDP 的患者阳性淋巴结较少(0.8±0.2 vs. 1.6±0.3;P=0.04*),C 型胰瘘发生率较低(0 比 13%;P=0.03*)。所有患者的中位随访时间为 11.4 个月。长期肿瘤学结果显示,LDP 与 ODP 的远处或局部复发(30% vs. 52%;P=0.05)和中位生存时间(18 比 15 个月)相似,1 年(73% vs. 59%)、3 年(22% vs. 21%)和 5 年(20% vs. 15%)生存率相似。

结论

本研究结果表明,LDP 是一种安全的手术方法,从肿瘤学角度来看,与 ODP 治疗胰腺腺癌相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验