Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Dr, EH 541, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5633-7. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
To compare the short-term and oncologic outcomes of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP).
Consecutive cases of distal pancreatectomy (DP) (n = 422) were reviewed at a single high-volume institution over a 10-year period (2005-2014). Inclusion criteria consisted of any patient with PDAC by surgical pathology. Ninety-day outcomes were monitored through a prospectively maintained pancreatic resection database. The Social Security Death Index was used for 5-year survival. Two-way statistical analyses were used to compare categories; variance was reported with standard error of the mean; * indicates P value <0.05.
Seventy-nine patients underwent DP for PDAC. Thirty-three underwent LDP and 46 ODP. There were no statistical differences in demographics, BMI, and ASA classification. Intraoperative and surgical pathology variables were comparable for LDP versus ODP: operative time (3.9 ± 0.2 vs. 4.2 ± 0.2 h), duct size, gland texture, stump closure, tumor size (3.3 ± 0.3 vs. 4.0 ± 0.4 cm), lymph node harvest (14.5 ± 1.1 vs. 17.5 ± 1.2), tumor stage (see table), and negative surgical margins (77 vs. 87%). Patients who underwent LDP experienced lower blood loss (310 ± 68 vs. 597 ± 95 ml; P = 0.016*) and required fewer transfusions (0 vs. 13; P = 0.0008*). Patients who underwent LDP had fewer positive lymph nodes (0.8 ± 0.2 vs. 1.6 ± 0.3; P = 0.04*) and a lower incidence of type C pancreatic fistula (0 vs. 13%; P = 0.03*). Median follow-up for all patients was 11.4 months. Long-term oncologic outcomes revealed similar outcomes including distant or local recurrence (30 vs. 52%; P = 0.05) and median survival (18 vs. 15 months), as well as 1-year (73 vs. 59%), 3-year (22 vs. 21%), and 5-year (20 vs. 15%) survival for LDP and ODP, respectively.
The results of this series suggest that LDP is a safe surgical approach that is comparable from an oncologic standpoint to ODP for the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
比较接受腹腔镜胰体尾切除术(LDP)和开腹胰体尾切除术(ODP)治疗胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的短期和肿瘤学结果。
在一家高容量的单中心回顾性分析了 10 年期间(2005-2014 年)连续接受胰体尾切除术(DP)的 422 例患者。纳入标准为手术病理学证实的任何 PDAC 患者。通过前瞻性维护的胰腺切除术数据库监测 90 天的结果。5 年生存率使用社会安全死亡指数。使用双向统计分析比较类别;方差用均数的标准误差表示;*表示 P 值<0.05。
79 例患者因 PDAC 接受 DP。33 例行 LDP,46 例行 ODP。LDP 和 ODP 组在人口统计学、BMI 和 ASA 分类方面无统计学差异。LDP 与 ODP 的术中及手术病理变量相当:手术时间(3.9±0.2 vs. 4.2±0.2 h)、管腔大小、腺体质地、残端闭合、肿瘤大小(3.3±0.3 vs. 4.0±0.4 cm)、淋巴结清扫(14.5±1.1 vs. 17.5±1.2)、肿瘤分期(见表)和阴性切缘(77% vs. 87%)。行 LDP 的患者术中出血量较少(310±68 比 597±95 ml;P=0.016*),输血需求较少(0 比 13;P=0.0008*)。行 LDP 的患者阳性淋巴结较少(0.8±0.2 vs. 1.6±0.3;P=0.04*),C 型胰瘘发生率较低(0 比 13%;P=0.03*)。所有患者的中位随访时间为 11.4 个月。长期肿瘤学结果显示,LDP 与 ODP 的远处或局部复发(30% vs. 52%;P=0.05)和中位生存时间(18 比 15 个月)相似,1 年(73% vs. 59%)、3 年(22% vs. 21%)和 5 年(20% vs. 15%)生存率相似。
本研究结果表明,LDP 是一种安全的手术方法,从肿瘤学角度来看,与 ODP 治疗胰腺腺癌相当。