Kilic Arman, Schuchert Matthew J, Pennathur Arjun, Gilbert Sebastien, Landreneau Rodney J, Luketich James D
Heart, Lung, and Esophageal Surgery Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):826-31; discussion 831-3. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.049.
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for achalasia have been excellent, although the long-term durability of this operation remains to be established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of LHM.
A single-institution review of patients undergoing LHM between 1992 and 2003 with > or =5 years follow-up. Failure was defined as symptom recurrence requiring reoperation. Univariate and multiple regression analysis were performed to identify preoperative variables predictive of long-term success.
A total of 46 patients underwent LHM with Toupet (n = 42) or Dor (n = 4) fundoplication. At a mean follow-up of 6.4 years, 37 (80%) patients remained free from failure. Mean time to symptom recurrence in those failing LHM was 21.3 months (range, 0.5-77). Causes of failure included nonfunctioning end-stage esophagus (n = 4), fibrotic narrowing at the gastroesophageal junction (n = 4), and tight wrap (n = 1). Univariate analysis identified high preoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP), no prior therapy, short duration of symptoms, and absence of sigmoidal esophagus as predictors of long-term success (P < or = .044 each). High LESP remained the only predictor of long-term durability in multiple regression analysis (P = .043). Reoperations included redo myotomy (n = 2), esophagectomy (n = 6), or both (n = 1). At final follow-up, 44 (96%) patients reported significant symptom improvement compared with pre-LHM severity.
LHM is associated with an 80% long-term success rate. Successful LHM may be predicted by high LESP, no prior therapy, short symptom duration, or absence of sigmoidal esophagus. In this series, failures of LHM underwent reoperation (redo myotomy or esophagectomy) with good results.
尽管腹腔镜下贲门肌层切开术(LHM)治疗贲门失弛缓症的短期疗效良好,但其长期疗效仍有待确定。本研究旨在评估LHM的长期疗效。
对1992年至2003年间接受LHM且随访时间≥5年的患者进行单机构回顾性研究。失败定义为症状复发需要再次手术。进行单因素和多因素回归分析以确定预测长期成功的术前变量。
共有46例患者接受了LHM联合Toupet(n = 42)或Dor(n = 4)胃底折叠术。平均随访6.4年,37例(80%)患者未出现失败情况。LHM失败患者症状复发的平均时间为21.3个月(范围0.5 - 77个月)。失败原因包括终末期食管无功能(n = 4)、胃食管交界处纤维化狭窄(n = 4)和胃底折叠过紧(n = 1)。单因素分析确定术前食管下括约肌压力(LESP)高、未接受过先前治疗、症状持续时间短和无乙状结肠食管是长期成功的预测因素(各P≤0.044)。在多因素回归分析中,高LESP仍然是长期疗效的唯一预测因素(P = 0.043)。再次手术包括再次肌层切开术(n = 2)、食管切除术(n = 6)或两者都做(n = 1)。在最后随访时,44例(96%)患者报告与LHM术前严重程度相比症状有显著改善。
LHM的长期成功率为80%。高LESP、未接受过先前治疗、症状持续时间短或无乙状结肠食管可能预测LHM成功。在本系列研究中,LHM失败的患者接受了再次手术(再次肌层切开术或食管切除术),效果良好。