Physiology Weihenstephan, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Weihenstephaner Berg 3, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Biotechnol Lett. 2010 Jan;32(1):35-44. doi: 10.1007/s10529-009-0130-2. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
The benefit and precision of blood diagnosis by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) is limited by sampling procedures and RNA extraction methods. We have compared five different RNA extraction protocols from bovine blood regarding RNA and miRNA yield, quality, and most reproducible data in the qRT-PCR with the lowest point of quantification. Convincing results in terms of highest quantity, quality, and best performance for mRNA qPCR were obtained by leukocyte extraction following blood lysis as well as extraction of PAXgene stabilized blood. The best microRNA qPCR results were obtained for samples extracted by the leukocyte extraction method.
血液定量实时 PCR(qPCR) 诊断的益处和准确性受到采样程序和 RNA 提取方法的限制。我们比较了从牛血液中提取 RNA 和 miRNA 的五种不同 RNA 提取方案,比较内容包括 qRT-PCR 定量下限的 RNA 和 miRNA 产量、质量和最具重现性的数据。在血液裂解后提取白细胞,以及提取 PAXgene 稳定血液的方法,可获得最高数量、质量和最佳 mRNA qPCR 性能的令人信服的结果。白细胞提取法提取的样本微 RNA qPCR 结果最佳。