Department of Cardiology, St. Bartholomews Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):150-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01603.x. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
Many patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial flutter (AFL) require periprocedural anticoagulation. We compared a strategy of conversion to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) periprocedure to uninterrupted warfarinization in a nonrandomized, case-controlled study.
One hundred and one consecutive patients requiring periprocedural anticoagulation for catheter ablation of typical AFL were studied. The first 51 patients underwent conversion to LMWH (enoxaparin 1 mg/kg bd) with a warfarin pause (LMWH group), the subsequent 50 continued with uninterrupted oral anticoagulation (Warfarin group). Primary endpoint was a composite of major and minor bleeding complications and groin symptoms.
Fewer patients in the Warfarin group reached the primary endpoint (36.0% vs 56.8%, P = 0.013). Four patients in the LMWH group but no patient in the Warfarin group required hospital admission for bleeding-related complications. Cost analysis showed mean cost per patient of anticoagulation with LMWH to be pounds sterling 100.9 (95% CI 94.46-107.30) compared to pounds sterling 10.23 (4.49-15.97) in the Warfarin group (P < 0.0001). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed prior to ablation in 11 patients in the Warfarin group and in 3 patients in the LMWH (P = 0.019). When TEE costs were included, costs were pounds sterling 125.00 ($188.25) (96.80-153.60) for the LMWH strategy and pounds sterling 108.5 ($163.40) (54.92-162.1) for the Warfarin group (P < 0.0001).
Catheter ablation of typical AFL without interruption of warfarin appears safer and more cost-effective than periprocedural conversion to LMWH. It could be used as a routine anticoagulation strategy for the ablation of right-sided arrhythmias.
许多接受心房扑动(AFL)导管消融的患者需要围手术期抗凝。我们在一项非随机、病例对照研究中比较了围手术期转为低分子肝素(LMWH)与持续不断的华法林化的策略。
101 例因典型 AFL 导管消融而需要围手术期抗凝的连续患者进行了研究。前 51 例患者接受 LMWH(依诺肝素 1mg/kg,bid)转换,并暂停华法林(LMWH 组),随后 50 例患者继续接受不间断的口服抗凝治疗(华法林组)。主要终点是主要和次要出血并发症和腹股沟症状的复合结果。
华法林组达到主要终点的患者较少(36.0%比 56.8%,P=0.013)。LMWH 组有 4 例患者需要因出血相关并发症住院治疗,但华法林组没有患者需要住院治疗。成本分析显示,LMWH 组每位患者的抗凝费用为 100.9 英镑(95%CI 94.46-107.30),而华法林组为 10.23 英镑(4.49-15.97)(P<0.0001)。华法林组中有 11 例患者在消融前进行了经食管超声心动图(TEE)检查,而 LMWH 组中有 3 例患者进行了 TEE 检查(P=0.019)。当包括 TEE 费用时,LMWH 策略的费用为 125.00 英镑(188.25 美元)(96.80-153.60),而华法林组的费用为 108.5 英镑(163.40 美元)(54.92-162.1)(P<0.0001)。
不中断华法林治疗的典型 AFL 导管消融似乎比围手术期转为 LMWH 更安全且更具成本效益。它可以用作右侧心律失常消融的常规抗凝策略。