• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由住院医师和经验丰富的外科医生进行的腹腔镜阑尾切除术。

Laparoscopic appendectomy performed by residents and experienced surgeons.

作者信息

Bencini Lapo, Bernini Marco, Martini Francesco, Rossi Michele, Tommasi Cinzia, Miranda Egidio, Sanchez Luis Josè, Naspetti Riccardo, Manetti Roberto, Ferrara Angelo, Nesi Silvia, Boffi Bernardo, Farsi Marco, Moretti Renato

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Careggi Main Florence University and Regional Hospital, Italy.

出版信息

JSLS. 2009 Jul-Sep;13(3):391-7.

PMID:19793482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3015988/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic appendectomy is widely performed by surgical residents, but its changing indications and outcomes have been poorly investigated. The aim of this study was to examine whether a difference exists in indications and outcomes between laparoscopic appendectomies performed by residents and those performed by experienced surgeons.

METHODS

Between 1999 and 2007, 218 laparoscopic appendectomies were performed and recorded. Data were analyzed to compare operations performed by residents with those by experienced surgeons in terms of indications for surgery and severity of disease. Moreover, laparoscopic appendectomies were thoroughly compared regarding outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

The residents had fewer conversions with laparoscopic appendectomy (8% vs 17%, P=0.04), and similar complication rates (12% vs 13%, P=0.16), compared with experienced surgeons. The median operating time was also comparable (67 minutes vs 60 minutes, P=0.23). However, patients operated on by residents had more emergencies (86% vs 70%, P=0.009), included more foreigners (27% vs 15%, P=0.03), and had intermediate to severe diseases, (81 vs 52%, P<0.001) than patients did operated on by experienced surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical residents performed more emergency laparoscopic appendectomies on foreign patients suffering from intermediate to severe diseases compared with experienced surgeons, with comparable surgical outcomes and lower conversion rates.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜阑尾切除术在外科住院医师中广泛开展,但其适应证的变化及手术效果尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在探讨住院医师与经验丰富的外科医生实施的腹腔镜阑尾切除术在适应证和手术效果方面是否存在差异。

方法

1999年至2007年间,共实施并记录了218例腹腔镜阑尾切除术。分析数据,比较住院医师与经验丰富的外科医生实施的手术在手术适应证和疾病严重程度方面的差异。此外,还对腹腔镜阑尾切除术的手术效果和并发症进行了全面比较。

结果

与经验丰富的外科医生相比,住院医师实施腹腔镜阑尾切除术时中转开腹的比例较低(8%对17%,P = 0.04),并发症发生率相近(12%对13%,P = 0.16)。中位手术时间也相当(67分钟对60分钟,P = 0.23)。然而,与经验丰富的外科医生所做手术的患者相比,住院医师所做手术的患者中有更多急诊手术(86%对70%,P = 0.009),包括更多外国患者(27%对15%,P = 0.03),且患有中重度疾病的比例更高(81%对52%,P < 0.001)。

结论

与经验丰富的外科医生相比,外科住院医师为患有中重度疾病的外国患者实施急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比例更高,手术效果相当,中转开腹率更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f9/3015988/c815513ef7eb/jsls-13-3-391-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f9/3015988/c815513ef7eb/jsls-13-3-391-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f9/3015988/c815513ef7eb/jsls-13-3-391-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomy performed by residents and experienced surgeons.由住院医师和经验丰富的外科医生进行的腹腔镜阑尾切除术。
JSLS. 2009 Jul-Sep;13(3):391-7.
2
Role of appendectomy in laparoscopic training.阑尾切除术在腹腔镜培训中的作用。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006 Apr;16(2):113-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.113.
3
Comparison of Appendectomy Outcomes Between Senior General Surgeons and General Surgery Residents.老年普通外科医师与普通外科住院医师行阑尾切除术的结局比较。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):679-685. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0578.
4
The impact of a resident's seniority on operative time and length of hospital stay for laparoscopic appendectomy: outcomes used to measure the resident's laparoscopic skills.住院医师资历对腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术时间和住院时长的影响:用于衡量住院医师腹腔镜技术的结果
Surg Endosc. 2004 Sep;18(9):1328-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9216-4. Epub 2004 Jun 23.
5
Transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy performed by residents is safe and feasible.住院医师实施的经脐腹腔镜阑尾切除术是安全可行的。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2016 Nov;9(4):270-274. doi: 10.1111/ases.12303. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
6
Appendectomy by residents is safe and not associated with a higher incidence of complications: a retrospective cohort study.住院医师施行的阑尾切除术安全,且与并发症发生率增加无关:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2012 Apr;255(4):715-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318248bdb5.
7
Can laparoscopic appendectomy be safely performed by surgical residents without prior experience of open appendectomy?没有开腹阑尾切除术经验的外科住院医师是否可以安全地进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术?
Asian J Surg. 2018 May;41(3):270-273. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
8
Laparoscopic appendectomy - Outcomes of senior trainees operating without supervision versus experienced pediatric surgeons.腹腔镜阑尾切除术——高级实习医生在无监督情况下手术与经验丰富的儿科外科医生手术的结果对比
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Feb;54(2):276-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.092. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
9
Laparoscopic appendectomy by residents: evaluating outcomes and learning curve.住院医师行腹腔镜阑尾切除术:评估结果和学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jan;24(1):125-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0691-0.
10
Improved outcomes for laparoscopic appendectomy compared with open appendectomy in the pediatric population.与开放性阑尾切除术相比,小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术的治疗效果有所改善。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 Oct;17(5):693-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0070.

引用本文的文献

1
Trainee as trainer in paediatric laparoscopic appendicectomy.小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术培训中的培训师角色
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 Feb;107(2):157-160. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0032. Epub 2024 May 24.
2
Trend of minimally invasive and open surgery experience of general surgery residents: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education general surgery case log in Thailand.普通外科住院医师的微创和开放手术经验趋势:泰国毕业后医学教育认证委员会普通外科病例记录
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023 Sep 15;26(3):121-127. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.121.
3
Routine use of laparoscopic techniques in daily practice improves outcomes after appendectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Traditional and laparoscopic appendectomy in adults: outcomes in English NHS hospitals between 1996 and 2006.成人传统及腹腔镜阑尾切除术:1996年至2006年间英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)医院的手术结果
Ann Surg. 2008 Nov;248(5):800-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818b770c.
2
Whose appendicectomy?--Do laparoscopic appendicectomies impair SHO training?谁的阑尾切除术?——腹腔镜阑尾切除术会损害外科实习医生的培训吗?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Oct;90(7):577-80. doi: 10.1308/003588408X318200.
3
Resident versus no resident: a single institutional study on operative complications, mortality, and cost.
在日常实践中常规使用腹腔镜技术可改善阑尾切除术的预后。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug;49(4):1763-1769. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02125-4. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
4
Feasibility of safe laparoscopic surgery performed by junior residents without exposure of open appendectomy: A retrospective study.低年资住院医师在不进行开腹阑尾切除术显露的情况下进行安全腹腔镜手术的可行性:一项回顾性研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Feb;11(2):581-586. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1196_21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
5
Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by Residents with No Experience in Open Appendectomy.无开放阑尾切除术经验的住院医师实施腹腔镜阑尾切除术的可行性与安全性
JMA J. 2019 Mar 4;2(1):54-59. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2018-0037. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
6
Laparoscopic appendectomy as an index procedure for surgical trainees: clinical outcomes and learning curve.腹腔镜阑尾切除术作为外科实习医生的指标手术:临床结果和学习曲线。
Updates Surg. 2021 Feb;73(1):187-195. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00950-z. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
7
Impact of tutorial assistance in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for acute recurrent diverticulitis.教程辅助在急性复发性憩室炎腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术中的作用
Surg Today. 2014 Oct;44(10):1869-78. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0790-3. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
8
Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database.基于大型管理数据库的开腹与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的趋势、变异性和结果。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Aug;26(8):2353-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2188-5. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
住院医生与非住院医生:一项关于手术并发症、死亡率和成本的单机构研究。
Surgery. 2008 Aug;144(2):339-44. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.031.
4
Recent experience with laparoscopic appendectomy in a Canadian teaching centre.加拿大一家教学中心腹腔镜阑尾切除术的近期经验。
Can J Surg. 2008 Feb;51(1):51-5.
5
Randomized clinical trial evaluating elective laparoscopic appendicectomy for chronic right lower-quadrant pain.评估择期腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗慢性右下腹疼痛的随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 2008 Feb;95(2):169-74. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6026.
6
Appendectomy: negative appendectomy no longer ignored.阑尾切除术:阴性阑尾切除术不再被忽视。
Arch Surg. 2007 Nov;142(11):1023-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.11.1023.
7
Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy in obese patients.在肥胖患者中,腹腔镜阑尾切除术优于开腹阑尾切除术。
Am J Surg. 2007 Dec;194(6):877-80; discussion 880-1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.043.
8
Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery.证明虚拟现实模拟在腹腔镜手术培训中的有效性。
Ann Surg. 2007 Nov;246(5):771-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180f61b09.
9
Changing trends in surgery for acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎手术的变化趋势
Br J Surg. 2008 Mar;95(3):363-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5961.
10
Laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with a body mass index of 25 or greater: results of a double blind, prospective, randomized trial.体重指数为25或更高的患者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项双盲、前瞻性、随机试验的结果
JSLS. 2007 Jan-Mar;11(1):54-8.