• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜阑尾切除术作为外科实习医生的指标手术:临床结果和学习曲线。

Laparoscopic appendectomy as an index procedure for surgical trainees: clinical outcomes and learning curve.

机构信息

Emergency Surgery Department, St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.

Department of Surgical Sciences, La Sapienza University Hospital, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2021 Feb;73(1):187-195. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00950-z. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-020-00950-z
PMID:33398773
Abstract

Surgical training is essential to maintain safety standards in healthcare. The aim of this study is to evaluate learning curves and short-term postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) performed by trainees (TRN) and attendings (ATT). The present study included the medical records of patients with acute appendicitis who underwent a fully LA in our department between January 2013 and December 2018. Cases were divided into trainees (TRN and ATT groups based on the experience of the operating surgeon. The primary outcome measures were 30-day morbidity and mortality. Preoperative patients' clinical characteristics, intraoperative findings, operative times, and postoperative hospitalization were compared. Operative times were used to extrapolate learning curves and evaluate the effects of changes in faculty using CUSUM charts. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce differences between cohorts regarding both preoperative characteristics and intraoperative findings. A total of 1173 patients undergoing LA for acute appendicitis were included, of whom 521 (45%) in the TRN group and 652 (55%) in the ATT group. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of complication rates, operative times and length of hospital stay. However, CUSUM chart analysis showed decreased operating times in the TRN group. Operative times improved more quickly for advanced cases. The results of this study indicate that LA can be performed by trainees without detrimental effects on clinical outcomes, procedural safety, and operative times. However, the learning curve is longer than previously acknowledged.

摘要

外科培训对于维持医疗保健的安全标准至关重要。本研究旨在评估受训者(TRN)和主治医生(ATT)进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)的学习曲线和短期术后结果。本研究纳入了 2013 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间在我科接受完全腹腔镜阑尾切除术的急性阑尾炎患者的病历。根据手术医生的经验,将病例分为受训者(TRN 组和 ATT 组。主要观察指标为 30 天发病率和死亡率。比较了术前患者的临床特征、术中发现、手术时间和术后住院时间。手术时间用于推断学习曲线,并使用 CUSUM 图评估教师变化的影响。采用倾向评分匹配分析来减少两组间术前特征和术中发现的差异。共纳入 1173 例接受 LA 治疗的急性阑尾炎患者,其中 521 例(45%)在 TRN 组,652 例(55%)在 ATT 组。两组在并发症发生率、手术时间和住院时间方面无显著差异。然而,CUSUM 图表分析显示 TRN 组的手术时间有所减少。对于晚期病例,手术时间的改善更快。本研究结果表明,LA 可由受训者进行,而不会对临床结果、程序安全性和手术时间产生不利影响。然而,学习曲线比以前认识的要长。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomy as an index procedure for surgical trainees: clinical outcomes and learning curve.腹腔镜阑尾切除术作为外科实习医生的指标手术:临床结果和学习曲线。
Updates Surg. 2021 Feb;73(1):187-195. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00950-z. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
2
Learning curve of laparoscopic appendectomy in a low-resource setting: a cumulative sum analysis of operative length.在资源匮乏环境下腹腔镜阑尾切除术的学习曲线:手术时间的累积和分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):4042-4047. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10954-0. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
3
Adopting Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: Is It Safe During the Learning Curve?儿童单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的应用:在学习曲线阶段是否安全?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Oct;29(10):1306-1310. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0112. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
4
Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals.222 家 ACS NSQIP 医院中腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的结局比较。
Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):625-35; discussion 635-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
5
Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly: A Single-center Experience.老年复杂性急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术:单中心经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Oct;27(5):366-368. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000447.
6
Laparoscopic appendectomy - Outcomes of senior trainees operating without supervision versus experienced pediatric surgeons.腹腔镜阑尾切除术——高级实习医生在无监督情况下手术与经验丰富的儿科外科医生手术的结果对比
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Feb;54(2):276-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.092. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
7
Learning curve of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy for noncomplicated acute appendicitis: a preliminary analysis compared with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.非复杂性急性阑尾炎单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的学习曲线:与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的初步分析比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 May;23(5):441-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0265. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
8
Impact of experience on quality outcomes in single-incision laparoscopy for simple and complex appendicitis in children.经验对儿童单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎单孔腹腔镜手术质量结果的影响。
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Aug;50(8):1364-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.11.030. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
9
Transumbilical extracorporeal laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy.经脐体外腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Feb;53(2):256-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
10
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice patterns and factors influencing surgical trainees' involvement in laparoscopic appendectomy in Northern Italy's largest educational network.意大利北部最大教育网络中影响外科住院医师参与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的实践模式及因素
Updates Surg. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02224-y.
2
Mesoappendix position variations in laparoscopic appendicectomy; a new anatomical classification to guide surgical strategy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾系膜位置变异;一种指导手术策略的新解剖学分类
Updates Surg. 2025 Mar 21. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02172-7.
3
Appendiceal collision tumors: case reports, management and literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.急性阑尾炎的诊断和治疗:WSES 耶路撒冷指南 2020 年更新版。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3.
2
The contemporary appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in adults.成人急性单纯性阑尾炎的当代阑尾切除术。
Surgery. 2019 Mar;165(3):593-601. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
3
Learning curves in surgery: variables, analysis and applications.手术学习曲线:变量、分析与应用。
阑尾碰撞瘤:病例报告、治疗及文献综述
Front Surg. 2023 Jun 7;10:1184322. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1184322. eCollection 2023.
4
Training curriculum in minimally invasive emergency digestive surgery: 2022 WSES position paper.微创急诊消化外科学培训课程:2022 WSES 立场文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Jan 27;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00476-w.
5
Factors Influencing the Difficulty and Need for External Help during Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Analysis of 485 Procedures from the Resident-1 Multicentre Trial.腹腔镜阑尾切除术时影响手术难度及是否需要外部协助的因素:来自住院医师-1多中心试验的485例手术分析
J Pers Med. 2022 Nov 15;12(11):1904. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111904.
6
Laparoscopic appendectomy, stump closure and endoloops: A meta-analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术、残端闭合与圈套器:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Sep 27;14(9):1060-1071. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.1060.
7
Antibiotic treatment for appendicitis in Norway and Sweden: a nationwide survey on treatment practices.挪威和瑞典的阑尾炎抗生素治疗:治疗实践的全国性调查。
BMC Surg. 2022 Jun 15;22(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01680-2.
Postgrad Med J. 2018 Sep;94(1115):525-530. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135880. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
Ten-year reassessment of the shortage of general surgeons: Increases in graduation numbers of general surgery residents are insufficient to meet the future demand for general surgeons.十年间普通外科医生短缺状况的再评估:普通外科住院医师毕业人数的增加不足以满足未来对普通外科医生的需求。
Surgery. 2018 Oct;164(4):726-732. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.04.042. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
5
Association of Surgical Practice Patterns and Clinical Outcomes With Surgeon Training in University- or Nonuniversity-Based Residency Program.外科手术实践模式与临床结果与外科医生在大学或非大学为基础的住院医师培训计划中的培训有关。
JAMA Surg. 2018 May 1;153(5):418-425. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.5449.
6
Comparison of Appendectomy Outcomes Between Senior General Surgeons and General Surgery Residents.老年普通外科医师与普通外科住院医师行阑尾切除术的结局比较。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):679-685. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0578.
7
Evaluation of Procedural Simulation as a Training and Assessment Tool in General Surgery-Simulating a Laparoscopic Appendectomy.评估程序模拟作为普通外科培训和评估工具——模拟腹腔镜阑尾切除术
J Surg Educ. 2017 Mar-Apr;74(2):243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
8
Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015.急性阑尾炎的诊断与管理。2015年欧洲内镜外科学会共识发展会议
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4668-4690. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5245-7. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
9
Endoloops or endostapler use in laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis : No difference in infectious complications.Endoloops或吻合器在腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎中的应用:感染并发症无差异。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):178-184. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4951-5. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
10
Resident involvement in laparoscopic procedures does not worsen clinical outcomes but may increase operative times and length of hospital stay.住院医师参与腹腔镜手术不会使临床结果恶化,但可能会增加手术时间和住院时间。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3783-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4674-z. Epub 2015 Nov 19.