Sewell M D, Spiegelberg B G I, Hanna S A, Aston W J S, Meswania J M, Blunn G W, Henry C, Cannon S R, Briggs T W R
The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, England.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Oct;91(10):1360-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B10.22144.
We describe the application of a non-invasive extendible endoprosthetic replacement in skeletally-mature patients undergoing revision for failed joint replacement with resultant limb-length inequality after malignant or non-malignant disease. This prosthesis was developed for tumour surgery in skeletally-immature patients but has now been adapted for use in revision procedures to reconstruct the joint or facilitate an arthrodesis, replace bony defects and allow limb length to be restored gradually in the post-operative period. We record the short-term results in nine patients who have had this procedure after multiple previous reconstructive operations. In six, the initial reconstruction had been performed with either allograft or endoprosthetic replacement for neoplastic disease and in three for non-neoplastic disease. The essential components of the prosthesis are a magnetic disc, a gearbox and a drive screw which allows painless lengthening of the prosthesis using the principle of electromagnetic induction. The mean age of the patients was 37 years (18 to 68) with a mean follow-up of 34 months (12 to 62). They had previously undergone a mean of six (2 to 14) open procedures on the affected limb before revision with the non-invasive extendible endoprosthesis. The mean length gained was 56 mm (19 to 107) requiring a mean of nine (3 to 20) lengthening episodes performed in the outpatient department. There was one case of recurrent infection after revision of a previously infected implant and one fracture of the prosthesis after a fall. No amputations were performed. Planned exchange of the prosthesis was required in three patients after attainment of the maximum lengthening capacity of the implant. There was no failure of the lengthening mechanism. The Mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society rating score was 22 of 30 available points (18 to 28). The use of a non-invasive extendible endoprosthesis in this manner provided patients with good functional results and restoration of leg-length equality, without the need for multiple open lengthening procedures.
我们描述了一种非侵入性可延长内置假体置换术在骨骼成熟患者中的应用,这些患者因恶性或非恶性疾病导致关节置换失败并出现肢体长度不等而接受翻修手术。这种假体最初是为骨骼未成熟患者的肿瘤手术而开发的,但现在已被应用于翻修手术中,用于重建关节或促进关节融合、替代骨缺损,并在术后逐渐恢复肢体长度。我们记录了9例在多次先前重建手术后接受该手术患者的短期结果。其中6例最初的重建手术采用了同种异体移植或肿瘤疾病的内置假体置换,3例用于非肿瘤疾病。假体的基本组成部分是一个磁盘、一个齿轮箱和一个驱动螺杆,它利用电磁感应原理实现假体的无痛延长。患者的平均年龄为37岁(18至68岁),平均随访时间为34个月(12至62个月)。在使用非侵入性可延长假体进行翻修之前,他们患侧肢体平均接受过6次(2至14次)开放性手术。平均延长长度为56毫米(19至107毫米),平均需要在门诊进行9次(3至20次)延长治疗。有1例在翻修先前感染的植入物后出现反复感染,1例在跌倒后假体骨折。未进行截肢手术。3例患者在植入物达到最大延长能力后需要计划中的假体更换。延长机制没有出现故障。肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会评分平均为30分中的22分(18至28分)。以这种方式使用非侵入性可延长内置假体为患者提供了良好的功能结果和腿长恢复,而无需进行多次开放性延长手术。