• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[水稻品种对不同生物型褐飞虱的抗性稳定性]

[Resistance stability of rice varieties to different biotypes of brown planthopper].

作者信息

Wu Bi-Qiu, Huang Feng-Kuan, Huang Suo-Sheng, Long Li-Ping, Wei Su-Mei

机构信息

Institute of Plant Protection, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China.

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2009 Jun;20(6):1477-82.

PMID:19795662
Abstract

In order to develop an effective analytical and monitoring method in breeding rice varieties with higher resistance stability to brown planthopper (BPH), Tai's method (1971) was employed to estimate the resistance stability of twelve rice varieties to different biotypes of BPH. It was shown that light intensity, seedling age, and nitrogen application rate had significant effects on the resistance performance and stability of rice varieties to different BPH biotypes. Among the varieties with resistance to BPH biotype II, the RHT, RP1976-18-6-4-2, and Ptb33 showed stable, IR56 showed unstable, while IR36 and ASD7 showed the most unstable resistance; whereas among the varieties susceptible to BPH biotype II, the TN1 showed stable, Guihuazhan, Foshanyouzhan and IR26 showed relatively stable, while Guojing No. 4 and Mudgo showed unstable susceptibility. For the rice varieties resistant to BPH biotype Bangladesh, the RHT, RP1976-18-64-2 and Ptb33 presented unstable, and IR56 presented very unstable resistance; whereas for the varieties susceptible to BPH biotype Bangladesh, the Guihuazhan, Foshanyouzhan and IR26 performed stable, TN1 and IR36 performed unstable, and Guojing No. 4, Mudgo and ASD7 performed the most unstable susceptibility.

摘要

为了开发一种有效的分析和监测方法,用于培育对褐飞虱具有更高抗性稳定性的水稻品种,采用了Tai(1971)的方法来评估12个水稻品种对不同褐飞虱生物型的抗性稳定性。结果表明,光照强度、秧龄和施氮量对水稻品种对不同褐飞虱生物型的抗性表现和稳定性有显著影响。在对褐飞虱生物型II具有抗性的品种中,RHT、RP1976 - 18 - 6 - 4 - 2和Ptb33表现出稳定的抗性,IR56表现出不稳定的抗性,而IR36和ASD7表现出最不稳定的抗性;而在对褐飞虱生物型II敏感的品种中,TN1表现出稳定的敏感性,桂华占、佛山油占和IR26表现出相对稳定的敏感性,而国粳4号和Mudgo表现出不稳定的敏感性。对于对孟加拉褐飞虱生物型具有抗性的水稻品种,RHT、RP1976 - 18 - 64 - 2和Ptb33表现出不稳定的抗性,IR56表现出非常不稳定的抗性;而对于对孟加拉褐飞虱生物型敏感的品种,桂华占、佛山油占和IR26表现出稳定的敏感性,TN1和IR36表现出不稳定的敏感性,国粳4号、Mudgo和ASD7表现出最不稳定的敏感性。

相似文献

1
[Resistance stability of rice varieties to different biotypes of brown planthopper].[水稻品种对不同生物型褐飞虱的抗性稳定性]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2009 Jun;20(6):1477-82.
2
[Geographical populations of brown planthopper in Nanning of South China and in Vietnam: a comparative study].[中国南方南宁和越南褐飞虱的地理种群:一项比较研究]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2013 Jan;24(1):190-6.
3
Comparative metabolomics analysis of different resistant rice varieties in response to the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Hemiptera: Delphacidae.不同抗褐飞虱水稻品种的比较代谢组学分析。
Metabolomics. 2019 Apr 11;15(4):62. doi: 10.1007/s11306-019-1523-4.
4
Identification of transcription factors potential related to brown planthopper resistance in rice via microarray expression profiling.利用基因芯片表达谱分析鉴定与水稻褐飞虱抗性相关的转录因子。
BMC Genomics. 2012 Dec 10;13:687. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-687.
5
Gene expression and plant hormone levels in two contrasting rice genotypes responding to brown planthopper infestation.两种对褐飞虱侵害反应不同的水稻基因型中的基因表达和植物激素水平
BMC Plant Biol. 2017 Feb 28;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-1005-7.
6
Changes in Endosymbiotic Bacteria of Brown Planthoppers During the Process of Adaptation to Different Resistant Rice Varieties.褐飞虱在适应不同抗性水稻品种过程中内共生细菌的变化
Environ Entomol. 2015 Jun;44(3):582-7. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvv054. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
7
Differential Responses of s in IR56 Rice to Two BPH Populations of Different Virulence Levels.IR56 水稻中 s 对两个不同毒力水平 BPH 群体的差异反应。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Dec 13;19(12):4030. doi: 10.3390/ijms19124030.
8
[Tolerance of rice varieties to whitebacked planthopper Sogatella furcifera and variation of nutrient components in rice plants].
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2003 Dec;14(12):2246-50.
9
Towards understanding of molecular interactions between rice and the brown planthopper.旨在理解水稻与褐飞虱之间的分子相互作用。
Mol Plant. 2013 May;6(3):621-34. doi: 10.1093/mp/sst030. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
10
A time-course transcriptomic analysis reveals the key responses of a resistant rice cultivar to brown planthopper infestation.一个时间过程转录组学分析揭示了一个抗褐飞虱水稻品种对褐飞虱侵害的关键反应。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 28;14(1):22455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73546-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration of molecular breeding and multi-resistance screening for developing a promising restorer line Guihui5501 with heavy grain, good grain quality, and endurance to biotic and abiotic stresses.整合分子育种与多抗性筛选以培育出一个有潜力的恢复系桂恢5501,该恢复系具有粒重、米质优良以及对生物和非生物胁迫的耐受性。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jun 7;15:1390603. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1390603. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparative metabolomics analysis of different resistant rice varieties in response to the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Hemiptera: Delphacidae.不同抗褐飞虱水稻品种的比较代谢组学分析。
Metabolomics. 2019 Apr 11;15(4):62. doi: 10.1007/s11306-019-1523-4.
3
Baubles, bangles, and biotypes: a critical review of the use and abuse of the biotype concept.
珠饰、手镯和生物型:对生物型概念的使用和滥用的批判性评价。
J Insect Sci. 2010;10:176. doi: 10.1673/031.010.14136.