School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Psychol Med. 2009 Dec;39(12):2001-12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709990262. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
In an effort to group mental disorders on the basis of aetiology, five clusters have been proposed. In this paper, we consider the validity of the first cluster, neurocognitive disorders, within this proposal. These disorders are categorized as 'Dementia, Delirium, and Amnestic and Other Cognitive Disorders' in DSM-IV and 'Organic, including Symptomatic Mental Disorders' in ICD-10.
We reviewed the literature in relation to 11 validating criteria proposed by a Study Group of the DSM-V Task Force as applied to the cluster of neurocognitive disorders.
'Neurocognitive' replaces the previous terms 'cognitive' and 'organic' used in DSM-IV and ICD-10 respectively as the descriptor for disorders in this cluster. Although cognitive/organic problems are present in other disorders, this cluster distinguishes itself by the demonstrable neural substrate abnormalities and the salience of cognitive symptoms and deficits. Shared biomarkers, co-morbidity and course offer less persuasive evidence for a valid cluster of neurocognitive disorders. The occurrence of these disorders subsequent to normal brain development sets this cluster apart from neurodevelopmental disorders. The aetiology of the disorders is varied, but the neurobiological underpinnings are better understood than for mental disorders in any other cluster.
Neurocognitive disorders meet some of the salient criteria proposed by the Study Group of the DSM-V Task Force to suggest a classification cluster. Further developments in the aetiopathogenesis of these disorders will enhance the clinical utility of this cluster.
为了根据病因对精神障碍进行分组,已经提出了五个聚类。在本文中,我们考虑了该提案中第一个聚类,即神经认知障碍的有效性。这些障碍在 DSM-IV 中归类为“痴呆、谵妄和遗忘及其他认知障碍”,在 ICD-10 中归类为“器质性,包括有症状的精神障碍”。
我们回顾了与 DSM-V 任务组研究小组提出的 11 个验证标准相关的文献,这些标准适用于神经认知障碍聚类。
“神经认知”取代了 DSM-IV 和 ICD-10 中分别用于此聚类中障碍的先前术语“认知”和“器质性”。虽然其他障碍也存在认知/器质性问题,但该聚类的特点是明显的神经基质异常以及认知症状和缺陷的显著表现。共享的生物标志物、共病和病程提供的证据对于有效的神经认知障碍聚类来说不太有说服力。这些障碍在正常大脑发育后发生,使该聚类与神经发育障碍区分开来。这些障碍的病因多种多样,但神经生物学基础比任何其他聚类中的精神障碍都更易于理解。
神经认知障碍符合 DSM-V 任务组研究小组提出的一些突出标准,表明存在分类聚类。这些障碍的病因发病机制的进一步发展将提高该聚类的临床实用性。