Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Metabolism. 2010 Feb;59(2):299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2009.07.027. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
The aims of the present study were to examine whether triglycerides (TG) and the triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-C) could predict insulin resistance in healthy African Americans and whites. This cross-sectional study included 99 African American and 50 white men and women between 18 and 45 years of age with body mass indexes between 18.5 and 38.0 kg/m(2). Anthropometric measures were obtained; and overnight fasting blood was collected for TG, HDL-C, glucose, and insulin. Insulin resistance was defined by fasting insulin concentration of at least 13.13 microU/mL and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) of at least 2.5. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to analyze the data. African Americans and whites had comparable demographic and anthropometric measures. Fasting insulin was higher in African Americans (12.4 +/- 7.8 microU/mL) than whites (10.2 +/- 7.5 microU/mL), but HOMA-IR did not differ significantly (African Americans, 2.9 +/- 2.0; whites, 2.4 +/- 1.9). Triglycerides and TG/HDL-C were significantly lower in African Americans (TG, 68.2 +/- 43.3 mg/dL; TG/HDL-C, 1.8 +/- 2.1) compared with whites (TG, 105.4 +/- 55.2 mg/dL; TG/HDL-C, 2.8 +/- 1.8). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that both TG and TG/HDL-C were acceptable markers of insulin resistance, as defined by fasting insulin concentration, in whites, 0.770 and 0.765, respectively, but poor predictors in African Americans, 0.633 and 0.651, respectively. Similarly, TG and TG/HDL-C were acceptable in predicting insulin resistance, as measured by HOMA-IR, in whites, 0.763 and 0.770, respectively, but poor in predicting HOMA-IR in African Americans, with areas of 0.625 and 0.639, respectively. In conclusion, the relationship between TG and TG/HDL-C with insulin resistance differs by ethnicity; and using TG and TG/HDL-C to predict insulin resistance in African Americans would not be appropriate.
本研究旨在探讨甘油三酯(TG)和甘油三酯与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值(TG/HDL-C)是否可以预测健康的非裔美国人和白人的胰岛素抵抗。这项横断面研究纳入了 99 名非裔美国人和 50 名年龄在 18 至 45 岁之间、体重指数在 18.5 至 38.0kg/m²之间的白种男女。测量了人体测量学指标;采集了隔夜禁食的血液样本,用于检测 TG、HDL-C、葡萄糖和胰岛素。将空腹胰岛素浓度至少 13.13μU/ml 和稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)至少 2.5 定义为胰岛素抵抗。使用接收者操作特征曲线分析数据。非裔美国人和白人具有可比的人口统计学和人体测量学特征。非裔美国人的空腹胰岛素(12.4±7.8μU/ml)高于白人(10.2±7.5μU/ml),但 HOMA-IR 无显著差异(非裔美国人,2.9±2.0;白人,2.4±1.9)。非裔美国人的甘油三酯和 TG/HDL-C 显著低于白人(甘油三酯,68.2±43.3mg/dL;TG/HDL-C,1.8±2.1)(甘油三酯,105.4±55.2mg/dL;TG/HDL-C,2.8±1.8)。接收者操作特征曲线下面积显示,TG 和 TG/HDL-C 分别是白人空腹胰岛素浓度定义的胰岛素抵抗的可接受标志物,分别为 0.770 和 0.765,但在非裔美国人中是较差的预测因子,分别为 0.633 和 0.651。同样,TG 和 TG/HDL-C 分别是白人 HOMA-IR 测量的胰岛素抵抗的可接受标志物,分别为 0.763 和 0.770,但在非裔美国人中预测 HOMA-IR 的能力较差,面积分别为 0.625 和 0.639。总之,TG 和 TG/HDL-C 与胰岛素抵抗的关系因种族而异;因此,在非裔美国人中使用 TG 和 TG/HDL-C 来预测胰岛素抵抗是不合适的。